- Joined
- Jul 8, 2014
- Messages
- 554
- Reaction score
- 2,843
I wonder if MB is a friend of CL's? :waitasec: Because his red car scenario lets CL off the hook. jmo
Wouldn't he have said it was a red-head girl in a VW bus then?
I wonder if MB is a friend of CL's? :waitasec: Because his red car scenario lets CL off the hook. jmo
If so, I am sure LE knows he is. I don't think so because he told Jane Valez-Mitchell that the guy in the red car could very well be CL when he was shown his photo.
I also think the arrest of CL on July 4th for the potato gun was a red herring. LE knew he was moving to Alaska soon, and wanted to get his fingerprints and DNA.
BBM ~Yes indeed. And with Mrs. CL stating "they missed something in our garage during the search" and "they'll never find the body".......well, seems like our LE heroes have a mighty good chance of being right. BTW the "quotes" are based on my recollection of the statements, not direct quotes to be perfectly fair.
That being said, I want to hear more from ol' Horse Ranch owner. She's gotten mighty quiet all of a sudden, whereas that gal was chatty as a child all sugared up at one point. She sure seems to know an awful lot about an awful lot. Can hardly wait to see her cross examined. It's also unbelievably suspicious to see the L couple abruptly skedaddle up to the high country in Alaska. If they weren't directly involved in the disappearance, any innocent couple would have stayed put lest face the scrutiny and suspicion they are under now. Can you imagine having your face splattered all over PEOPLE magazine? Good grief! CL should have acted like a MAN and stayed put and answered questions. What a COWARD. Good thing he left the Marines. They don't look kindly upon COWARDS.
Of course this is just all OPINION and SPECULATION.
Does someone have cl court date. I looked in several places and it did not come up.
I also think the arrest of CL on July 4th for the potato gun was a red herring. LE knew he was moving to Alaska soon, and wanted to get his fingerprints and DNA.
You can't really justify your viewpoint even if based on just MSM though. You're right, car remotes are everywhere; which is why everyone knows you cannot lock a singular door with them. You lock the Entire Car. She's not likely to wait until she gets to the other car to lock hers. MB is not going to recall a simple remote locking as a significant enough detail to mention. It wouldn't be ambiguous to him if it was a remote locking, the car honks, lights flash, locks click, etc. "Maybe locked her door" Door , no "s"; singular, as in what you can only do while physically present at the object itself. And he didn't say 'locked her car'. Simple enough, right?
http://www.cbs8.com/story/26028006/...arine-wife-had-rendezvous-with-man-in-red-car
I am still really struggling with the description of the guy in the red car; at one point MB says light colored, sandy hair, and NOT a big buff guy.
CL has dark hair, and is definitely buff. :/
I know they would have obtained his fingerprints, however, I'm not sure about his DNA unless he voluntarily gave it up at their request. Unfortunately, in California DNA is not automatically obtained upon arrest. It is only obtained under certain circumstances.
Has anyone thought that perhaps it wasn't EC OR CL in those cars? I know we've talked about NL wearing ballcaps. What if someone else picked her up? I know it's a stretch, but just brainstorming. Is there any scenario in which this could have been JC and NL, and they were trying to track down their missing spouses to see if they were together? I know this is unlikely, but...
two possible other scenarios:
NL with a Marine whom she asked a favor/ride?
NL with a male volunteer or teen from the ranch whom she asked a favor? ETA: Not sleuthing, just a possible scenario based on the fact that NL/CL appear to have volunteered with past teen activities at the ranch and have been known to drive around other teens with them..
I would think if NL recruited someone just to give her a ride, they would have come forward. Why risk being found out later if you're only "guilty" of giving a ride to a friend?
I would think if NL recruited someone just to give her a ride, they would have come forward. Why risk being found out later if you're only "guilty" of giving a ride to a friend?
Thinking on it, I guess someone could have come forward and we just aren't aware.
what is the general consensus on AK media not picking up this story? It surprises me, because we know MSM loveeesssss stories like this. Is it just a "protecting our own" mentality?