As for Gianni, He was there. They know he was there, Belvedere told the TV station. They have an idea that he saw everything and he was there.
http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2014/Jan/02/tp-family-of-slain-man-plead-for-brothers-return/
How do they know that Gianni was there and believe he saw everything? Was he ID's by someone or what evidence leads them to believe this?
We are not getting that part piece of information and it seems LE doesnt want that info out there. Why? If Gianni is a suspect and say LE has him ID'd as the shooter.
What would be the benefit to LE withholding that info and playing down stuff? What is the benefit in not naming him as a suspect if LE knows he was involved? In having trouble understanding how LE could know for a fact Gianni was there and believe he saw everything but not know if he is a suspect or a victim. That doesn't make sense to me.
I think some of the articles didn't include the part he said after that:
"It is said he was there, he was there, they know he was there," Otto said.
Gianni's uncle clarified with CBS News 8 on the phone Thursday what police have told the family.
"After checking with them (my nieces), evidently it's not what they said," Otto said.
I think he either sort of fabricated what he believed they were told initially or it was wishful thinking or...?
I'm honestly not sure LE would necessarily confirm that either way to the family at this point since the person missing is also family, despite that they're the family of one of the crime victims as well.
And I'm also not sure if his 'oh oops' statement even means that they have confirmation either way or if it's really just that he didn't understand that they may not given confirmation either way.
The fact that they've not released it, like you said, makes me think there's a strategic reason for that or that they just flat out don't know anything conclusively yet (though I doubt that)
If the family does know, the fact that LE isn't releasing it would surely mean they were told not to either I would think. In which case, then either the uncle had to have made the entire thing up basically, piecing together things along with what he seems to want to be the case. And while IF he knew something he shouldn't have told, since LE didn't, but family shouldn't really have told him either likely.
To be honest, I wonder if they may believe someone somehow connected DOES know something and may be covering up some info to try to protect someone or even maybe someone else being involved as well and that they may slip and spill or do something that would give LE more info.
Now if this totally cools down for quite some time, I could see that being released just to try to flush things/info out.
More importantly, as to the Gianni status part, I think they're not saying he is a suspect because if they have reason to believe he's alive and fled out of fear OR because of involvement, I'm thinking they are expecting he may reach out to his family or someone or even come home altogether if he thinks they only think he is missing and not involved (or even just thinking his family will stand with him regardless)
But like the confirmation one way at the mall, I could see this changing as well if things stay quiet (assuming they need leads) they might release it to try that as a tactic to flush him out, but also just to get it back in in the news could be a possibility.
There was a missing pastor's wife brutally killed in AL (we've got a thread in one of the other threads - crimes in the news I think?) and LE hardly said anything. It really seemed like there wasn't going to be a break. Just this week they arrested her husband as he was getting ready to board a plane out of the country. It had really seemed like we'd never get resolution and her murderer would get away with it since quite a bit of time had passed. It was good encouragement for the 'stick-to-it-tive-ness' pays off mentality when it comes to some of these.
I'd love to see the killer be ID'd in only 5 more days...but I'll take 5 months, or even 5 years at this point!