More from the Union-Tribune today:
Very interesting that they knowingly did not include a full description to the public.
Curious if they doubted those first descriptions or if it was strategy not releasing that it may have been a BMA, or the clothing that would have been more descriptive.
VERY odd that the one thing they had released - the tan pants - does NOT appear in the other descriptions even what was aired to officers.
Was that not correct?
If multiple people apparently saw the person, as it sounds given the slight variations in leaving the car, walking toward a car, etc. it's odd the tan pants would have been remembered over ethnicity and the more notable striped sweater. You'd think that'd have been the overlooked thing - maybe saying NOT wearing jeans, but to have remembered the pant colour is interesting.
OR they saw more and for some reason, that that part's really all that had been released. But then even moreso that if THAT is what had been released - and the sweater or race, both far more likely to be helpful or memorable to possible other witnesses who'd realize they may have also seen the person - weren't released until now, why?
It'd almost seem like they had a possible person in mind (or something had them confident that description wasn't correct somehow) and didn't want to tip them off. Otherwise why exclude the info that would have been most likely to assist in the public being able to help find the suspect and/or find Gianni?
Is there someone close to them that would fit that description and they didn't want that person tipped off that they were aware he may be involved?
What I find
most interesting about this is that it says two were interviewed at length AFTER. I'd suspect that is because then they discovered there was a third person potentially either an additional victim or a possible suspect, which didn't seem to be known initially.
I'd love to know how long after those more extensive interviews took place. And I'm curious why those were ones they went back to to talk more with vs. however many others may not have been revisited for additional/more in depth interviews.
Archived scanner traffic includes a police dispatcher saying, “Suspect possibly left in a 2008-2011 dark gray Honda Civic, four-door, suspect is a black male, mid-20s, 5’9”, thin build, wearing a dark sweater with white stripes on both sleeves, he was last seen walking away to the passenger side of the Honda, that vehicle last seen westbound on Camino del Rio North about 20 ago.”
An officer added a few minutes later: “Witnesses here saw a male walking from the back of the victim’s vehicle then get in a car and drive away.”
At least two witnesses were later interviewed at length.
Several hours later, police officials put out this description to the public: A man of unknown race, possibly in his 20s, about 5 feet 9 inches to 5 feet 11 inches tall, wearing tan pants and an unknown color shirt. He drove away in a 2008 to 2011 dark gray Honda sedan.