• #981
Criminal Sex Act of Mimi Haley: GUILTYCriminal Sex Act of Kaja Sokola: NOT GUILTYThird-Degree Rape of Jessica Mann: NO VERDICTThe jury will continue deliberating tomorrow on the third-degree rape charge. Unusual stuff.

 
  • #982
  • #983
  • #984
  • #985
  • #986
  • #987
  • #988
Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced Hollywood producer whose scandal in 2017 was pivotal in drawing global attention to the #MeToo movement, will be tried for a third time by New York prosecutors in the sexual assault case of Jessica Mann.

New York Judge Curtis Farber said on Wednesday that he wants the trial to take place before the end of this year.

A jury could not render a verdict in June on a rape charge accusing Weinstein of sexually assaulting Mann, a former actor...
 
  • #989
Harvey Weinstein just arrived in court in a wheelchair, wearing a wrinkled navy-blue suit and looking especially pale.

Judge Farber just denied everything the defense requested regarding interviewing the jurors that claimed they were bullied into the guilty verdict.

The state is asking about sentencing for Miriam Haley, and confirms they want to try Weinstein on the Jessica Mann charge for the 3rd time. They mention April 2026, and Judge Farber asks why so far away…

The defense says that April is way too far away, Farber says he wants the trial to happen the first week in March. Weinstein isn't reacting at all.

The state said they may have 10 days of witness testimony for the Jessica Mann trial, so March is too soon.Judge Farber: But it's a retrialArthur Aidala, Weinstein's attorney: It's a triple retrial


Judge Farber just set the retrial for March 3rd.


Judge Farber asked if the defense would like a bench trial or a jury trial, and they don't know yet.


Aidala stood and expressed his disappointment that this case is going to trial for the third time-an E felony-citing Weinstein’s health issues, his 16-year Los Angeles sentence, and the belief that if his client weren’t Harvey Weinstein, the case could be resolved without another trial. He also noted that Mann previously said testifying and preparing for trial was so stressful it sent her to the hospital.Arthur Aidala: If this was 'Harvey Jones,' a judge would sentence him and not waste the tax payer money. We wouldn't have the deputy prosecutor prepare and spend all this money for an E -felony. I have fatigue of this case. It's not fair to the citizens.Farber: Is your client interested in a plea?Aidala: The numbers they are suggesting will have him die in prison.Aidala asks to speak with Weinstein for a few minutes privately.


The defense wanted the jurors names redacted or private on filings, but Judge Farber argued they already spoke to the press. The state also claimed this was not a waste of tax payer time, and said this is what justice in Manhattan is for rape-survivors.


I'm sitting in the second row of the gallery, and made eye contact with Weinstein as he was wheeled out to speak to his lawyers. He looks so alarmingly pale.

Weinstein returned, and Aidala said he did not want to have plea negotiations in open court. They moved to the judge's chambers. When Weinstein was wheeled back out, he was holding the book "Unplugged," by Tom Freston.


Many people in the gallery are whispering about how terrible Weinstein looks. I concur. He looks like he hasn't seen sunlight in decades, honestly.


The lawyers are at the bench now, having a discussion with Judge Farber, and they are laughing.


Farber stated that while there were discussions, Weinstein would like additional time to discuss plea negotiations, and he would like to keep the schedule they previously discussed. Farber said he will not impose sentencing on Miriam Haley.


Harvey Weinstein speaks to judge- I took notes as best as I could, I'm sure I missed some:“At least one juror carried a personal agenda, saying I bribed someone. These allegations shattered any impartiality. I’ve been incarcerated nearly 6 years, half of which at Rikers Island. The conditions are soul-crushing. Rikers is a death sentence. My mental state has collapsed and I have constant anxiety. The isolation is unbearable. I go to sleep with anxiety that I will not wake up. I believe my children need me. I won’t let my daughter, who is 15 years old, in there because of the conditions. I let my 12-year-old son in there once. I know I was unfaithful, but I never assaulted anyone. I have taken lie detector tests, and I’ve asked for another one. I ask to speak to the jurors; I don’t understand why we can’t talk to them. I don’t mean to be disrespectful.”


The judge sets a date of February 25 for pre-trial motions ruling, and reiterates the trial is March 3rd. Court is adjourned. Harvey is wheeled out, and says goodbye to his prison consultant and public relations people.

 
  • #990
  • #991
  • #992
Harvey Weinstein was just rolled into the courtroom via wheelchair, looking much more alert than I've seen in the past.

Day 5: The state will call two "very brief" witnesses, and then Jessica Mann (the sole accuser in the trial) will take the stand.

Witness on the stand is Rothschild Capulong, a former overnight manager of the DoubleTree Hotel on 51st and Lexington (the location of the alleged 2013 rape).


Capulong checked Weinstein into the Doubletree Hotel on March 18, 2013 around 10:30AM EST. We review a document that confirms his check in.

The comments section of the document said 'do not address him by his real name,' but states that it’s celebrity Harvey Weinstein, who checked in. Capulong stated he didn’t know who he was.


Capulong confirms that Weinstein was with a female. He confirms his observation (or impression, per Marc Agnifilo's objection) was that the female did not want to be there at that time. Capulong said the female looked "unhappy."


Capulong said he came this conclusion because she "was not smiling." He said it looked like she did not want to be there- Agnifilo objected, and it was sustained.

Capulong goes onto say Weinstein was "looming" on the counter and rushing the check-in process. He says he was leaning on the counter, with his torso touching.

State asks how close Weinstein's body came to his while checking him in, and he couldn't recall. State asked how he was feeling in that moment, Agnifilo objects, and it's sustained.

State asks to approach, Farber says no.State rephrases the question, and Capulong says he felt intimidated because Weinstein's voice was very loud.

Capulong says he wanted to get a better look at the woman with Weinstein because of a “gut feeling” and he wanted to make sure she was ok. He describes his training in guest safety. When he tried to get a better look at the woman, he says Weinstein moved and blocked his view.

He recalls writing his report/email, and wrote of his “gut feeling,” and asked security to monitor the 19th floor, where Weinstein’s room was booked. Capulong also stated he didn't call 911 because he didn't see any immediate danger.

Capulong states it was infrequent for him to write safety reports like that.



Marc Agnifilo for cross-examination: He brings up the email/report, and how important it was.

Agnifilo asks where the email is- Capulong states he doesn't know where the email is, and he never saw it.


MA: Isn't the purpose of the important email would be so you can document something, and you wouldn't have to be guessing what you wrote, 13 years later?

Agnifilo asks if he recalls anything Weinstein and the woman (now identified as Mann) were wearing. He doesn't recall.Agnifilo pulls up Weinstein "check-in" document, and points out that the DA's office essentially approached them in 2018 and asked them to recall all of this.

MA asks if Capulong told anyone else about this incident, and he says one person, who has since passed away.

MA says something along the lines of "OHHHHHHH, so the only person you told passed away"



Agnifilo asks if he told his co-worker standing 3 ft away from him about the intimidation he felt with Weinstein.
Capulong said no.

MA: Did you ever try to find that email you sent?
Capulong: No.
MA: Did you see him physically touch the female at all?
Capulong: No.
MA: So there was no touching whatsoever?
Capulong: No


Capulong lists the people who reportedly received the email, and confirms he didn't receive a response.

MA: What did you write in the email? To the best of your memory?Capulong: I wrote the female companion appeared to be discontent, and could they check in on the 19th floor

No further questions. Redirect

 
  • #993
State pulls up the hotel check-in document, and asks if he wrote about his safety concerns in the comments, would security see it?
Capulong: Yes

State: But would they see it in real time?
Capulong: No


State (Nicole Blumberg) brings up Agnifilo asking "why he did things a certain way" that day. Why did he do it via email?

Capulong: I wanted it to be confined to the department heads.NB: Was that what you were taught to do?
Capulong: yes


Many objections to form of questions, all sustained.



NB: You were asked probably 20 questions about this email, by Mr. Agnifilo. You talked about concerns for the woman's safety, and you directed someone to the floor. Do you need to see the email to remember?

Capulong: No, it was about the specific event.



NB asks if Capulong felt intimidated again- objection, but overruled. Weinstein shrugged his shoulders and hands. NB continues to ask how he felt.

Judge now says questioning is becoming repetitive.



Agnifilo says NB is leading, and it's her witness. NB says no further questions, and Agnifilo gets up for brief redirect, first asking about who he told about the intimidation, then the email. It's getting hectic as NB is objecting and Judge is cutting them off.

Capulong is dismissed. Mid-morning break.


 
  • #994
  • #995
  • #996
  • #997

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
2,841
Total visitors
2,968

Forum statistics

Threads
647,275
Messages
18,873,787
Members
246,282
Latest member
bajivarma
Top