It actually goes against logic that the car wasn't the target ~ if it was some random crime. MOOAnd it really bothers me that someone took the child and not the BMW - otherwise, one could assume it was a car-theft-turned-kidnapping.
It actually goes against logic that the car wasn't the target ~ if it was some random crime. MOOAnd it really bothers me that someone took the child and not the BMW - otherwise, one could assume it was a car-theft-turned-kidnapping.
I thought the back door was locked. MOOIs there not a back door at the store?
http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_13036933
Hassani, who will be a first-grader at Leitch Elementary School, lives on a quiet street in Fremont with his sister, his aunt, Jennifer Campbell, and her fiance, police said. His biological parents live separately in San Francisco. Police have declined to say why the boy does not live with them, though his mother may have some health problems.
...
In addition to interviewing the boy's aunt and her fiance, police have interviewed the boy's mother and grandmother. They had not yet spoken with the boy's father
I thought he was supposed to have gone around to the front to go through the store and unlock the back door. And that's when he discovered Hassani missing. MOO
I have a question.
When you foster child the state usually pays you monthly right?
When you adopt a child that you fostered do they still give you a monthly check?
I'm having a hard time believing the foster dads story.
maybe losing that payment would effect their life style...
I have a question.
When you foster child the state usually pays you monthly right?
When you adopt a child that you fostered do they still give you a monthly check?
I'm having a hard time believing the foster dads story.
maybe losing that payment would effect their life style...
Oh, so maybe he did lock the car so the car thiefs couldn't steal it, and therefore they took Hassani. Yes, that makes sense now. NOT! :doh: MOORoss and Campbell say they did not leave Hassani in the car. When they returned to the alley, the child was missing.
Ok, they left him alone in the alley. MUCH BETTER.
It sounded to me more like a family arrangement. Just MOOHave we seen any official statement that these two were official foster parents? Or was this some interfamily arraingment?
I have a question.
When you foster child the state usually pays you monthly right?
When you adopt a child that you fostered do they still give you a monthly check?
I'm having a hard time believing the foster dads story.
maybe losing that payment would effect their life style...
They took the baby sister into protective custody.
http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_13036933
I haven't read all the articles (sorry - I'm thread hopping - or just lazy, you choose), but what was the point of going in the front (which was unlocked?) to go open the back door to bring the child in? Because children of staff can only enter the back? Because it was easier to carry the baby in (was it nearer to the car?)? The articles I did read said that only the baby was going in - so was it the end of the foster mom's shift, or was this just a visit?
Sorry, I might just be bass-ackward on all this...
Like Paintr, I want to know if this is common? I don't think I have heard of this before.
It really makes no sense. After all, it was a shoe store and I'm sure lots of people enter and leave--what difference would it make if an employee's fiance brought a child in through the front door, as long as they (the fiance and the child) behaved, and weren't acting disruptive to customers?
It doesn't make sense.
If there were some minutes left until the end of the aunt's shift, Ross could have taken the boy through the front door, to the back of the store, to wait until aunt was off work.
Apparently Ross was leaving the boy in his aunt's/foster mom's care because he had to go to a class. That's the story, anyway.