Found Alive CA - Jamie Tull, 33, Le Grand, 18 July 2017

New Posts

  • #81
Ugh, this case is so suspicious to me.
Where was she living? Can LE confirm that there was indeed a phone call? When DH texted her parents, did he know where she was? Like exactly? When is the last time someone else saw her.
My brain is overreacting again[emoji53]

Sent from my Life One X2 using Tapatalk
 
  • #82
The HelpfindJamie.com website, shows there are fliers posted a several links from media.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
  • #83
mrsNKY said:
I think it may be because, if she is in a manic state, you may want to use caution. Not that she would hurt anyone, only that she may be unpredictable, make erratic or nonsense statements. It would allow people to have an idea if the come into contact with her, her actions MAY not be normal to some. That is why I would think they would.
They wouldn't try to hide it, but they don't want to jeopardize her either. It's a odd road at times, as I'm sure you know. It's sometimes a balancing act. I really don't see "her" parents as making this statement for any other reason. Now of it were only "his" parents putting out her diagnosis, I would raise an eyebrow. And also, it appears as though her parents are divorced, so I really wouldn't think as the both mother and father making her diagnosis, to explain away anything nefarious. I think they really don't know what to do. And as always, there is a lot we have no idea about behind the scene. As often the way it is, media don't put out as much of these types of things as we would like. Unfortunately. And as a family, maybe they don't have someone to try to help them, by making suggestions.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I agree with you. I've grown up with four bi polar relatives. All of them have had manic episodes, and been committed several times. If she was in a manic state it is important to release that information. My grandmother was killed in a car accident while in a manic state. She hadn't slept for days and ended up falling asleep at the wheel on her way to Vegas. Nobody even knew she was headed there. She just took off on her own. It's important for people to know if a person isn't in their right mind so they can use caution when they approach them. I think it's harder for people to understand if they haven't dealt with manic depression themselves, or had someone close to them that has it.
 
  • #84
  • #85
What a Merced County detective says about the case of the missing Riverbank woman

Merced County Sheriff’s Department Detective Chris Sziraki said Monday morning “there is no real update at this point.”

He said his department has not received any “credible” tips. Her family offered a $100,000 award for her safe return.
Sziraki said the case is still being treated as a voluntary, at-risk missing adult case.

Asked when this type of case turns more criminal in nature, he responded, “when evidence shows that. At this point, there’s no evidence.”
He added that “nobody is being investigated. ... There is nothing to show there is any foul play in this.”
Click to expand...
 
  • #86
  • #87
If you don't investigate it as foul play, you will never have any evidence of foul play. If someone did something to her, did he think they would leave him a note?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #88
I just wonder if anyone actually saw her walk away ? They keep using that term. I imagine that in that rural area she could've crashed her car and no one would've noticed. Also Merced county sheriff deputies are spread far and thin . So it could've taken a while for LE to show up at the scene. It strikes me as odd that if someone picked her up , they wouldn't think it weird that she was out there all alone. Or that they wouldn't have heard of this missing lady. Leads me to believe this is a recovery as much as it saddens me.

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk
 
  • #89
CluelessWonder said:
If you don't investigate it as foul play, you will never have any evidence of foul play. If someone did something to her, did he think they would leave him a note?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
If it is foul play . I think it'd have to be a stranger abduction and the odds of some creep driving by at that exact time is not likely. I don't get any hinky feeling about the hubs .

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk
 
  • #90
Just thinking out loud. The other day I was driving home from work and I saw a woman hitch hiking on the freeway . I thought to myself , wow that's weird , I haven't seen a hitch hiker in a long time let alone a woman by herself. So if she did flag somebody down they'd think she was in trouble . It's just not common anymore unless it's an emergency to hitch a ride. At least not here.

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk
 
  • #91
CluelessWonder said:
If you don't investigate it as foul play, you will never have any evidence of foul play. If someone did something to her, did he think they would leave him a note?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Other than her husband, and the crime scene where else should he look for foul play? We can figure, phones have been pinged and records checked, it appears as though (through reports)the hubby and family have been out searching and appears the are cooperating. Unless there has been a sighting of her or some personal indicators of wrong-doing, what else should they check? On the news report above, they have had dogs and search parties in the area, so I can see what he means, really. It's really unfortunate and I hope there is a sighting, or someone else thinks of something that could give them a lead. Right now, apparently any leads coming in, turns out to be a dead end.

I am really praying something breaks with this soon. It's really sad. I hope she was picked up by some good samaratain, that took her to a facility out of the area, and she's getting help, and will soon contact her family. [emoji53]

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
  • #92
mrsNKY said:
Other than her husband, and the crime scene where else should he look for foul play? We can figure, phones have been pinged and records checked, it appears as though (through reports)the hubby and family have been out searching and appears the are cooperating. Unless there has been a sighting of her or some personal indicators of wrong-doing, what else should they check? On the news report above, they have had dogs and search parties in the area, so I can see what he means, really. It's really unfortunate and I hope there is a sighting, or someone else thinks of something that could give them a lead. Right now, apparently any leads coming in, turns out to be a dead end.

I am really praying something breaks with this soon. It's really sad. I hope she was picked up by some good samaratain, that took her to a facility out of the area, and she's getting help, and will soon contact her family. [emoji53]

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

A voluntary polygraph test might put a stop to the inevitable finger pointing that is bound to happen in any case where a spouse goes missing while a divorce is pending.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #93
Apparently, according to the mom. The divorce was being called off. I think if they had enough probable cause, they would probably ask him too. I'm thinking right now, they may not even see the need to do that. So far, it looks as though they are getting along well. It's refreshing that they are working together, instead blaming each other. Hopefully they are able to get her home safely.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
  • #94
No updates???

This is very, very strange.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #95
  • #96
  • #97
  • #98
  • #99
mrsNKY said:
Other than her husband, and the crime scene where else should he look for foul play? ... <snipped>
Click to expand...
I would categorize is as a crash site, not necessarily a crime scene. But, those are the two things to consider, for sure. If she walked away, where would she most likely go?
 
  • #100
GigTu said:
I would categorize is as a crash site, not necessarily a crime scene. But, those are the two things to consider, for sure. If she walked away, where would she most likely go?
Click to expand...
I clearly misspoke on this statement, however; trying to state that wherever the person above, seems as though they should be polygraphing the spouse. They would need a crime scene or evidence of possible wrong doing, to question the spouse on polygraph.
I didn't get my point across very well. Lol

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

... and 97 more.
Total: 2,660 (members: 98, guests: 2,562)

Online statistics

Members online
98
Guests online
2,562
Total visitors
2,660
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
632,810
Messages
18,631,995
Members
243,300
Latest member
DevN
Back
Top