oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,739
Rob McMillanVerified account @abc7robmcmillan 11s11 seconds ago
The witness also believes a latch on the back of the truck was causing reflections in the security video, further evidence in his mind that the truck in the video is Charles Merritt's work truck.
I agree, it's damning.Thanks, Tortoise!
The FARO evidence is incredible. Too bad we don't have live stream or video later on.
Thanks, Tortoise!
The FARO evidence is incredible. Too bad we don't have live stream or video later on.
I agree, however... I'm not convinced about the latch being what is reflecting. It's too bad that we will probably never see all this videoOMG that's the clearest visual match yet IMO
Rob McMillanVerified account @abc7robmcmillan 52s53 seconds ago
Note: before the jury was allowed into the courtroom today, one of the defense attorneys argued about prosecutorial misconduct. There was a testy exchange between the attorneys. It is clear those feelings are still there, as they argue over objections right now.
Rob McMillanVerified account @abc7robmcmillan 35s35 seconds ago
The defense is continuing to question the 3D expert on confirmation bias, in trying to make the suspect truck match the truck in the video. Expert: "I understand that cognitive bias exists. I do my best to avoid it."
No - I wish I were at the trial. I don't know if it was good to do it or not. I truly think the do not care one iota.Have you been at the Trial Frankie? Good for you to do that.
Its painful already to know CM murdered their mommy, and daddy in cold blood, but the way he also took G & J. jr.'s life is one of the worst double homicides of tiny children I've ever seen.
Knowing CM was the last face they ever saw rips my heart out for all of them, just thinking about it.
None of us know.
I forgot about time change, thought we had another hour. I have to adjust now lol
You missed the point of the post I responded to. katy was saying that he did it to try to see if backdating could be done, but there is no evidence that he tried or did backdate the cheque on the 4th, and if he had already done the cheques on the 1st and 2nd, he didn't need to "try" anything, he had already done it and knew he could. That then morphed into well 'maybe he looked at the options to see if he could backdate', which of course, there is no evidence of that.
That’s not correct as all the evidence is saying he was the killer.
You may not wish to believe so but the evidence suggests otherwise so we do know hence him being on trial right now.