Pick me!!!! I was open minded but now that I have heard the evidence I believe the defendant is guilty BARD.We should let some outsiders reading this thread to judge who on this thread are more open minded than whom.![]()
Pick me!!!! I was open minded but now that I have heard the evidence I believe the defendant is guilty BARD.We should let some outsiders reading this thread to judge who on this thread are more open minded than whom.![]()
Pick me!!!! I was open minded but now that I have heard the evidence I believe the defendant is guilty BARD.
You were open minded is incorrect English.
Sigh and HoHum.
Will now scroll.![]()
Part 1 of today's audio was just a total waste of an hour. LOL. Maline went absolutely nowhere with Sgt Hanke. Maline was harping on Hanke's conversations with the towing company guys that picked up the Trooper. Jeez Louise. Maline was obviously trying to worm in some sort of testimony that Merritt couldn't have left the Trooper in San Ysidro if his phone pings *after* 1:30 pm showed he was in Rancho Cucamonga area. The Prosecution even declined to do any sort of cross examination. It was pitiful. And another one bites the dust...
Do you consider yourself to be open minded in terms of this trial?![]()
Part 1 of today's audio was just a total waste of an hour. LOL. Maline went absolutely nowhere with Sgt Hanke. Maline was harping on Hanke's conversations with the towing company guys that picked up the Trooper. Jeez Louise. Maline was obviously trying to worm in some sort of testimony that Merritt couldn't have left the Trooper in San Ysidro if his phone pings *after* 1:30 pm showed he was in Rancho Cucamonga area. The Prosecution even declined to do any sort of cross examination. It was pitiful. And another one bites the dust...
The vehicle's not going anywhere because the wheels came off about 6 or 7 witnesses ago and they need to salvage it.Yeah, that was a vehicle going nowhere. I wish L&C would upload Part 2, it's probably not long nor informative but hey, we're near the end and need to see it through, no matter how inanely it limps to the finish line.
Let me guess, more objections to hearsay and inserting facts not in evidence for the judge to sustain?After listening to it... it was obvious to me that the State did NOT want him to say what the defense wants him to say. And it's also obvious that they can't call Mr. Murray to the stand because he is no longer alive. I will have to go back to Dugal's or the security guys testimony to see what was said in their testimony about Mr. Murray, does anyone recall?
BBM...It was obvious with the Judge sustaining so many of the Prosecution's objections that the Judge agreed it wasn't appropriate questioning. (hearsay, beyond the scope, cumulative, no foundation, assumes facts not in evidence, etc etc etc)After listening to it... it was obvious to me that the State did NOT want him to say what the defense wants him to say. And it's also obvious that they can't call Mr. Murray to the stand because he is no longer alive. I will have to go back to Dugal's or the security guys testimony to see what was said in their testimony about Mr. Murray, does anyone recall?
Part 1 of today's audio was just a total waste of an hour. LOL. Maline went absolutely nowhere with Sgt Hanke. Maline was harping on Hanke's conversations with the towing company guys that picked up the Trooper. Jeez Louise. Maline was obviously trying to worm in some sort of testimony that Merritt couldn't have left the Trooper in San Ysidro if his phone pings *after* 1:30 pm showed he was in Rancho Cucamonga area. The Prosecution even declined to do any sort of cross examination. It was pitiful. And another one bites the dust...
It’s been 4 months and all the PT has managed to do is show CM potentially had motive but so did several others. They have not connected him to the murders whatsoever, they have not produced one iota of physical forensic evidence. All they’ve done is recited a potpourri of innuendos suggesting Merritt’s guilt, not unlike a magic trick relying upon the power of suggestion, repeat something enough times and it must be true.
I will not be swayed until I see reliable evidence linking Merritt to either the alleged crime scene or the burial site.
Let me guess, more objections to hearsay and inserting facts not in evidence for the judge to sustain?
Because a witness says something and the prosecution objects does not mean they're trying to hide something.
Maybe it's not what you're inferring, but that seems to be the status quo for the pro-Chase crowd, that the prosecution is being deceitful and misleading when all along this has been the defense's shameless tactics.
The defense should focus more on explaining the backdating of the checks and trying to delete the QB account. That is the nail in his coffin. All this other stuff is not really going to make a $.hit bit of difference to exonerate the two timed felon. Tick tock.