CA - Joey, Summer, Gianni, Joseph Jr McStay Murders - Feb 4th 2010 #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,541
  • #1,542
This trial has gone far beyond it’s expected time frame with so many starts & stops , the jury must be fed up by now.
I don’t think Rudin’s testimony did much for the defense , yesterday.
This was the testimony that the defense claimed was so important, the trial had to be delayed ,yet again.
Was it worth the risk of angering the jurors?
They’re the ones getting jerked around , hourly.
Not the impression I’d want my defense team to leave at the end of the trial. JMHO

I would agree about the jury and the truck IF they hadn't asked 2 weeks ago to see the truck in person. So for some of them, the truck is important enough to them to ask to see it.

I hope when the trial is over that the jurors will speak publicly at some point. It will be interesting to hear what was and wasn't important to them in their decision making.
 
  • #1,543
So actually Knowles DID testify in order? Or did the defense call someone else this morning?
Nope, she was put in during the DT cross, probably flight constraints. DT said they DID have more witnesses for today yesterday afternoon but didn't say who.........all a cluster if you ask me.
 
  • #1,544
So closing arguments starting Tuesday?
 
  • #1,545
  • #1,546
  • #1,547
So closing arguments starting Tuesday?

Yeah, not like they're in any hurry to wrap this up - why not at least Monday?
 
  • #1,548
so apparently no rebuttal case by the Prosecution and they are going straight to closing arguments on Tuesday??
 
  • #1,549
  • #1,550
so apparently no rebuttal case by the Prosecution and they are going straight to closing arguments on Tuesday??

I guess Knowles was the only rebuttal they planned.
 
  • #1,551
  • #1,552
I'll be there. I wouldn't miss it for anything. Woo hoo! I can't believe we've actually made it this far.

Can you tweet from the courtroom?
 
  • #1,553
From what I could understand, exhibit O was a text Rudin sent to Imes, which Imes apparently received but didn't read (Daugherty was the one talking about it). If there is a hearing, I hope we at least get audio of it (unlike the hearing the day before yesterday which would shed some light on this whole situation).
I think it was the attached exhibit that did not get passed along . The info was given to the defense right away but the actual exhibit was not. I think ....
 
  • #1,554
  • #1,555
Can you tweet from the courtroom?
If only I knew how. Lol
If you want to email me your number I can text and you can Tweet.
 
  • #1,556
I wonder if they had audio from this morning, they started at 10:00, or at least they were supposed to.
 
  • #1,557
I have all of next week off!
 
  • #1,558
If only I knew how. Lol
If you want to email me your number I can text and you can Tweet.

LOL I don't text, never been a cell-phoner. o_O
 
  • #1,559
  • #1,560
No clue because everyone that is there sucks LOL Time wise, I'm thinking they must have called someone this morning? Court was to start at 10am, it's now 11:15 am, so must have been a witness this morning?
With this trial it’s entirely possible the time was spent arguing outside the presence of the jury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
3,435
Total visitors
3,537

Forum statistics

Threads
632,665
Messages
18,629,901
Members
243,239
Latest member
Kieiru
Back
Top