CA - Joey, Summer, Gianni, Joseph Jr McStay Murders - Feb 4th 2010 #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #201
If a juror is to violate the rules and read this post here, you bet they'd be reading youtube comments as well.
Well, you better report that to the judge, very serious situation you're talking about!
 
  • #202
It seems a terrible imposition for DK to have to hire a lawyer. I recall a woman employee (can't remember her name) who called the police for some reason at CM's place of business (on CM) and he hid in the bathroom. I know it's very vague, but it's been 9 years since I read this. Anyway, are any of the people CM conned, swindled, or defrauded (including this employee) called by the prosecution? Is his background of stealing brought up by the prosecutor? I haven't followed the trial except to look here occasionally, hoping it's in deliberations. Thanks to anyone that can answer my questions.
 
  • #203
It seems a terrible imposition for DK to have to hire a lawyer. I recall a woman employee (can't remember her name) who called the police for some reason at CM's place of business (on CM) and he hid in the bathroom. I know it's very vague, but it's been 9 years since I read this. Anyway, are any of the people CM conned, swindled, or defrauded (including this employee) called by the prosecution? Is his background of stealing brought up by the prosecutor? I haven't followed the trial except to look here occasionally, hoping it's in deliberations. Thanks to anyone that can answer my questions.
Unfortunately, they can't bring up past "activities".
 
  • #204
It seems a terrible imposition for DK to have to hire a lawyer. I recall a woman employee (can't remember her name) who called the police for some reason at CM's place of business (on CM) and he hid in the bathroom. I know it's very vague, but it's been 9 years since I read this. Anyway, are any of the people CM conned, swindled, or defrauded (including this employee) called by the prosecution? Is his background of stealing brought up by the prosecutor? I haven't followed the trial except to look here occasionally, hoping it's in deliberations. Thanks to anyone that can answer my questions.

I think that most of his behavior has been ruled off limits. Deliberations may start the week of the 21st.
 
  • #205
It seems a terrible imposition for DK to have to hire a lawyer. I recall a woman employee (can't remember her name) who called the police for some reason at CM's place of business (on CM) and he hid in the bathroom. I know it's very vague, but it's been 9 years since I read this. Anyway, are any of the people CM conned, swindled, or defrauded (including this employee) called by the prosecution? Is his background of stealing brought up by the prosecutor? I haven't followed the trial except to look here occasionally, hoping it's in deliberations. Thanks to anyone that can answer my questions.
Elva Fonseca. She testified.
 
  • #206
Bickering posts that have derailed the thread have been removed.

Just a reminder to make sure your own side of the street is clean before you report that the other side needs cleaning.

Any more bickering or insults in this thread and more thread reply bans will be forthcoming.
 
  • #207
I'm looking forward to court Monday...and especially because I think after the Prosecution's comments about McGee out drinking & dancing last Saturday, that McGee will be there. Oh Lucy - you got some splainin' to do. LOL
 
  • #208
I'm looking forward to court Monday...and especially because I think after the Prosecution's comments about McGee out drinking & dancing last Saturday, that McGee will be there. Oh Lucy - you got some splainin' to do. LOL

Right? I'm surprised we are actually going to have court on Monday. Like something must be wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #209
I'm looking forward to court Monday...and especially because I think after the Prosecution's comments about McGee out drinking & dancing last Saturday, that McGee will be there. Oh Lucy - you got some splainin' to do. LOL
:) I do believe you're onto something there! LOL!
 
  • #210
It's going to be an interesting start to the court day.
 
  • #211
I'm wondering if L & C are even going to set their camera/s up in the Court room on Monday? Will they go through the hassle of setting it up for one day? I hope so. Otherwise there are going to be some very disappointed members!
 
  • #212
I'm wondering if L & C are even going to set their camera/s up in the Court room on Monday? Will they go through the hassle of setting it up for one day? I hope so. Otherwise there are going to be some very disappointed members!

I just screamed internally, I forgot about that! :(
 
  • #213
He may have already consulted one, who implied that his best option would be to disappear until it all blows over.
That is what i am thinking too. In his predicament one would certainly seek legal advice because of the seriousness of the implications in a DP trial against him.
 
  • #214
Well, you better report that to the judge, very serious situation you're talking about!
Exactly, that would be a big no no for a juror.
 
  • #215
Delete
 
  • #216
I just screamed internally, I forgot about that! :(
Aww...sorry geevee!!! :( It was the 1st thing I thought of when reading the most recent posts re Court on Monday---I was like, please..please let there be live streaming!!
 
  • #217
Aww...sorry geevee!!! :( It was the 1st thing I thought of when reading the most recent posts re Court on Monday---I was like, please..please let there be live streaming!!
I will not be shocked if they aren't there lol I do know that Cathy said she planned on going back for closings... so I imagine the cam will be back eventually, just don't know if it will be for one day next week, I didn't think of asking her that in chat the other day.
 
  • #218
I will not be shocked if they aren't there lol I do know that Cathy said she planned on going back for closings... so I imagine the cam will be back eventually, just don't know if it will be for one day next week, I didn't think of asking her that in chat the other day.
I won't be terribly shocked either, but I'll be very disappointed, if that makes sense lol. Oh bugga, I was actually hoping you, or someone would have asked Cathy in the L & C Chatbox and shared here. I think perhaps with everything that went down last Wednesday (in the court room) there was alot of chatter and nobody thought to ask about the camera's being in the court room on Monday :( Nevermind, we will have to wait and see!
 
  • #219
If CM committed the murders there would be scientific forensic evidence connecting him to the murder scene and I haven't seen any.
That's^^^ not true. Plenty of murderers have gotten away without any forensics from the crime scene being found. Especially when that crime scene is not tested for several years.
 
  • #220
If I was local, I would probably try LOL But I'm not... so can't haha I just cannot see why the defense wouldn't want to get him on the stand, even the prosecution seems to believe he would plead the 5th, why wouldn't the defense? That would be way better than the juror's hearing that the PI couldn't find him.

I don't know why Dan just doesn't come forward... the defense has accused him of some pretty serious crimes in court and in the media (according to the pro's, I haven't looked for any articles stating that) and if he is innocent, shouldn't he be screaming it from the rooftops like some have thought Merritt should have been doing all these years? JMO

It doesn't matter what the defense attorneys accuse him of, when they are trying to deflect blame from their own client.
What matters is what the Detectives and the DA believes. If they are not accusing him, then he is not too concerned. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
138
Guests online
1,327
Total visitors
1,465

Forum statistics

Threads
632,396
Messages
18,625,820
Members
243,134
Latest member
jynr74
Back
Top