JMarsh
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2018
- Messages
- 1,038
- Reaction score
- 2,769
Afraid of something.IIRC, she was afraid of an Ex?
Afraid of something.IIRC, she was afraid of an Ex?
Actually, it was fridaybaker who originally referred to the Chasing Waterfalls posts of long ago, asking if anyone else remembered them. Then, A lucas chimed in yes. Then, I did also. Yes, they were in the private forums (my recollection is that there weren't many of them), but don't know if they are still accessible. As to the identity of the Chasing Waterfalls poster, I doubt if we would be allowed that information, but I'm sure the mods could answer the question, as well as any other regarding the posts.Are we allowed to know the member name of the poster who was suspected to be Chase, and are his posts still there? I assume you are talking about posts on the private McStay forum. Sorry I cannot attach this to HelenK's post now.
There is no way to know. Pure speculation that they didn't. Sounds to me that he spent an awful lot of his time in their house after they moved in? Knew quite a lot about their lifestyle. Why wasn't he home with his own family?
In the OS, the Prosecutor claimed CM owed JM around $43K, IIRC
And it's all about him! He gets to spiff up and look like a member of the defense team. Crisp shirt and tie, reading glasses, taking lengthy notes on a legal pad. That long lunch time must be hard.OMG, he is LOVING it! I know from experience from working in LE for 18 years. ANY time an inmate get's out of his cell, especially those who are housed alone, they thrive for any human contact with other people.
Inmates will make any excuse to go to the Dentist, see the Dr, or whomever that can get them out from the chaos that happens in the dayroom or out of their cell when being housed alone.
Yes. They upscale from that small apt, a bit of a mess,IMO, then buy an adorable house. Joey was in his 40's right? CM was 10 years older? Joey was moving forward. Wanting the best for his family.Sacrificing the beach for better digs. And CM doesn't appear to have any equity.Mony re your earlier comment about Chase potentially finding out JM’s big bank balance and wanting a piece of the action. I think you may have something there. He was obvs rummaging around to have found the QB log in details so maybe he did see the big bank balance at some point.
I know Joey didn’t tell Sequida how much he was selling the custom fountains for so maybe Chase didn’t know the profit margin either, so big bank balance may have been a shock and a trigger.
Over the three years they knew each other CM must have felt very jealous (especially as he considered himself business partner?!) as Joey was on the up and up whereas CM was Struggling with debt and reduced to plumbing and electrics and the lower income associated with that.
To top it all off JM then moved his family into that fantastic house on Avocado Lane. The Murders happened soon after. Maybe the house purchase was another nail in the coffin for CM and woke the green eyed monster within him? JMO
Mony re your earlier comment about Chase potentially finding out JM’s big bank balance and wanting a piece of the action. I think you may have something there. He was obvs rummaging around to have found the QB log in details so maybe he did see the big bank balance at some point.
I know Joey didn’t tell Sequida how much he was selling the custom fountains for so maybe Chase didn’t know the profit margin either, so big bank balance may have been a shock and a trigger.
Over the three years they knew each other CM must have felt very jealous (especially as he considered himself business partner?!) as Joey was on the up and up whereas CM was Struggling with debt and reduced to plumbing and electrics and the lower income associated with that.
To top it all off CM then moved his family into that fantastic house on Avocado Lane. The Murders happened soon after. Maybe that was another nail in the coffin for CM and woke the green eyed monster in him? JMO
And in the OS, the defense said that if the prosecutor's had looked at the attachment on an email, it would have been $899. Neither are evidence.
And it's all about him! He gets to spiff up and look like a member of the defense team. Crisp shirt and tie, reading glasses, taking lengthy notes on a legal pad. That long lunch time must be hard.
Yes. They upscale from that small apt, a bit of a mess,IMO, then buy an adorable house. Joey was in his 40's right? CM was 10 years older? Joey was moving forward. Wanting the best for his family.Sacrificing the beach for better digs. And CM doesn't appear to have any equity.
And it was downward spiral from there. His buddy, his bff who seemed to be forgiving for a lot of years, called his bluff.I believe you both very well could be correct.
I've always felt, based on CMs past history, he was the type of individual that spends money before it's even made. I wonder how many times he had to rush to the bank to put funds in to cover all the checks he had already written?
He had big plans on the money he thought he was going to be making when Joey's business took off like a rocket, with the sky as the limit.
Imo, he had already been reduced to doing jobs anyone could do for far less than he was costing Joey.
Imo, on the 4th Joey told him he was OUT! Joey had already made this decision that day when he had the fatal meeting with CM.
Joey didn't have tell anyone else . Joey knew whatever decision he thought was in the best interest of the company, Patrick would support Joey's decision 100 percent.
Imo
Hi Missy!
Wasn't the quoted amount more to do with his gambling debts he owed Joey?
Yes, we will see, since the state's opening has no bearing on all other evidence that may be introduced during the entire state's case. They may be saving that back for strategic reasons. Like for rebuttal in case CM testifies.
Imo
I know people have opined on that. But I am not seeing it. He looks pretty health to me. And we only have the benefit of the stupid cameras with L and C.He also tries to appear frail and old, IMO.
They didn't 'hire' a forensic accountant as such but they used one of their own in-house specialists, and contrary to what the defense argued to the judge about the people doing this in response to what the defense said they did in their opening speech, the state's forensic accountant had been brought in to the case since early part of last year if I'm not mistaken.
The state said there was no "report" but that they would submit the excel spreadsheets to the judge for him to look at. This was about a week ago.
I know people have opined on that. But I am not seeing it. He looks pretty health to me. And we only have the benefit of the stupid cameras with L and C.
Completely agree
You know what amazes me? If true that he staged the crime scene, the moxie he had to pull that off. How could he be confident that no one would notice? How did he come and go? Where did he park? No doubt he came under cover of darkness, but still how did he go unnoticed? We've heard about the 2 am log on to the computer on Feb 8th. Seems that was refuted in testimony based on poster's observation. I tried to follow but it kept timing out and the youtube channel was more commercials and expert chatter than testimony! I have resisted going back and listening to the testimony in the evening. Would much rather read a good book. LOL. Thankful for the posters that do that. I think he is guilty but waiting to hear all the evidence. At the rate this is going I could be dead in 6 months. Really feel for these jurors.
So he was hired a year ago and they are JUST submitting the paperwork? And not even a report saying what he will testify to? That doesn't seem right...
I did catch that they were looking for discovery, but didn't hear whether he was just hired or what. This helps clear it up... I guess LOL
JMO
Thanks. Did I screw up the dates? Not surprising. LOL. I don't keep notes. It's all swirling around in my crazy brainBBM above... I don't think the 8th has been cleared up, but the 5th was. The prosecution showed that an Intuit QB's Free Credit Check and Score bookmark was accessed... on cross, it was shown that it was actually a scan and it was 1 of 27,000 files accessed within minutes, thus more likely that it was a system scan.
Just wanted to make that clear. I am sure we will hear more about the 8th somewhere along the way though ;-)
And why would he even discuss what meds he was taking in a police interview?Was that to stress that he is an old man? Whatever possessed him to think LE would have any interest in that? Did he mention he may be on statins? HB meds? Coagulants post stent? He's a conman, IMO.Yes, very "interesting," that he was hanging around their home, EATING dinner, etc. Especially when he claims in his book, that Summer was POISONING her husband. WHY would anyone with half a brain, want to eat anything at a friend's house, if they believed that the guy's wife was poisoning him?!?
And speaking of "poison," is it not also "interesting," that he admitted to going to Tijuana for Viagra. I wonder if he picked up any date rape type drugs, also? And slipped them into JM's drinks whenever he could. Not hard to do, if JM "always paid." Helpful, good friend that he was, CM could've gone over to fill up the drink cups, slipping the drugs in, without being noticed.
Wow, love this question. Impartial due process as it relates to the presumption of innocence? Bottom line, imo...I don't think it's humanly possible because of the nature of the human brain.
As a juror, you begin at innocent. As testimony accumulates, it becomes part of the process. That process, which comes naturally to humans, is to categorize information based on recognizable patterns. That is how we label and file things in our brain to make sense of information.
As information is obtained, we assign a value of importance based on how it is fits or doesn't fit into a perceived pattern - in this case, pattern of guilt or pattern of innocence. A juror is aware of the overall balance as the information accumulates, and while they certainly can say they are not leaning one way or another, they are definitely aware of the tipping of the scale. The opinion being formed is fluid. It has to be in order to know where to focus when going into deliberations. Otherwise, every single thing that was presented during trial would have to be discussed all over again to be assigned a value. Obviously, much of the testimony is re-discussed in deliberations, and that is where individual categorizations can be changed to have more or less weight. I don't believe you can listen to six months of testimony and truly have no opinion as to which way the scale is tipping. Due process doesn't really exist as technically defined. It exists a fluid process, not a fixed one.
At websleuths, we are not held to the standards of jurors, which allows us to formulate theories that may be completely wacky. Frankly, I think trying to set up a separate thread to "act" like we're jurors is absurd. We've been exposed to way to0 much information to try to revert to a clean slate.