Love that the judge can ask questions...
Jones says that any DNA evidence found on items from the grave would, in his opinion, come from after they were unearthed.
Look at the data, the highest probability is it should be the victims... if none of the results are the victims, he has no confidence that it's what was put in the ground 3 1/2 years prior.
Something that came on to the items after it was buried or after it was unearthed.
defense question... answer... if they were not in contact with the victims DNA, he would not expect it to have any DNA.
during decomp process... they are breaking down... they become liquid... blah blah blah is being broken down... a study done at the body farm... bury bodies and then go back and do testing... tested soil samples... primary reason for doing that is to see if there is potential to identify the body in that area... they found after 6 months, there is no DNA that can be recovered. Limited study, limited sample size... 2 bodies. They were testing only the dirt.
IMO... if the defense can't match the DNA they found to someone that should NOT have been there, it will mean nothing. It could be from someone that processed the scene.
Jones says that any DNA evidence found on items from the grave would, in his opinion, come from after they were unearthed.
Look at the data, the highest probability is it should be the victims... if none of the results are the victims, he has no confidence that it's what was put in the ground 3 1/2 years prior.
Something that came on to the items after it was buried or after it was unearthed.
defense question... answer... if they were not in contact with the victims DNA, he would not expect it to have any DNA.
during decomp process... they are breaking down... they become liquid... blah blah blah is being broken down... a study done at the body farm... bury bodies and then go back and do testing... tested soil samples... primary reason for doing that is to see if there is potential to identify the body in that area... they found after 6 months, there is no DNA that can be recovered. Limited study, limited sample size... 2 bodies. They were testing only the dirt.
IMO... if the defense can't match the DNA they found to someone that should NOT have been there, it will mean nothing. It could be from someone that processed the scene.