GUILTY CA - Laci Peterson, 27, pregnant, Modesto, 24 Dec 2002 #2

[katydid23]

My guess is that no new evidence has been presented in this case- just old evidence that has been re-interpreted in an attempt to prove the unprovable- that Scott is innocent.

And the judge stated the reason for denying the evidence:

“In the court’s ruling, strong exculpatory evidence was disregarded as ‘inadmissible’ which is not the correct legal standard,” Brown wrote.


So this 'evidence' was legally inadmissible---thus possibly Hearsay, Speculative or Irrelevant, Illegal Procurement, etc.