Squishified
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 2,396
- Reaction score
- 53
Lana's "friend" contradicted herself with every sentence. I did not believe her.
Lana's "friend" contradicted herself with every sentence. I did not believe her.
I can't believe Sara Caplan is going to testify. Can't wait to see it.
It’s a go.Has she agreed? I hadn't heard that. Thanks for the info, last I heard, her appeal had been turned down. If she refused then the judge would send her to jail, if after a certain amount of time, she still refused, then they would play her taped interview.
Its a go.
The judge calls Caplan into the well of the courtroom. She is wearing a black pants suit and clutching a tissue.
Fidler says, I need to ask you: Are you prepared now to testify?
Slight pause. Caplan looks at her attorney and then back at the judge.
Yes, your honor, she says.
She will be on the stand at 1:30 p.m. PT. -- Harriet Ryan
http://blog.courttv.com/phil_spector/
from the court tv reporters blog.
I'm going to miss the testimony every day since I've gone back to work, but here's part of an interesting article regarding Sara Caplan!
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-spector12jul12,0,7778107.story?coll=la-home-local
A former lawyer for Phil Spector must testify before the jury in the music producer's murder trial, the state Supreme Court ruled today.
Without comment, the state's top court declined to hear an appeal from Sara Caplan, who has been held in contempt for refusing to testify before the jury in the Spector case. The action, in effect, rejects the appeal.
Where is Lisa... WHERE ARE YOU LISA????
W
Anybody watching?
Did Punkin Pie have a financial interest in witnessing for the defense?
HALP, where are all of you?
W
WPunkin Lie, I mean Pie says no BUT Jackson on cross and recross examination, busted her elusive azz BIG time.
1. Her current all exclusive promoting gigs has narrowed down to only one club now . . . and one of Expectorate's very good friend is a main investor in that club . . . AND she has been a friend of said investor for at least 10 years. She admits that said friend adores the "lizarded-tongue mongrol of 60 plus years ago musical genius ".
2. She admits she spoke to a publisher after Lana's death but she claims only because she was seeking advice on how to handle the public media . . . EVEN though Lana's family requested her to not make this event into a media circus and to refuse all interview by them. My question . . .did she REALLY need a PUBLISHING FIRM to CLARIFY this for her? :doh: She further stated that the book was about her, albeit she would focuse about her life from the time Lana died and thereon; adding her "life" was all about Lana and it ended when Lana died. I think I'm going to throw up. :sick:
Jeeeeeezus this woman-wanna-be is pathetic. Wouldn't answer if she plans to write a tell all after she is through testifying.
This botox losing "friend" of Lana's went from a low cut v-neck blouse displaying sagging breasts, with a chirrpy attitude on Thursday, to a "Mrs Hyde" donning a high neck shirt and a "now let me show you how devastated I am" role. today. Absofreakinglutely pathetic . . .
Want to fly to L.A and biotch slap this "I need my 15 minutes" loser. :slap:
Hope this helps W
GoodMorning!
Hi Acts, WOW great post and Thank You, as I have been missing the trial for about a week now due to company. I tried to read last night about her day in court yesterday, but your post puts it all in context for me. Loved AJ exposing her for what she is and what she did! Punkin LOL, what can I say LOL! She doesn't know the difference between the P and the D? Dumber than dumb huh?
I read a post at the other place, where a poster now believes there is reasonable doubt after hearing from Punkin LMBO--shoot her! :bang: Doesn't that make you really wonder about the poster?
I'm so enjoying this trial, but I must say, it is summertime and all ya know! My heart aches for Lana and her family, but to dwell on PS non stop, I have decided to not be so obsessed with the trail. I realized it is really bad when I find myself dreaming about this trial.
I will be able to watch some of it today tho, Yea!
A quick recap of today (since I missed it and had to read up!)
Clarkson was despondent, friend says
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-spector17jul17,0,2071884.story?coll=la-home-local
and here's another article about the testimony with a photo of the witness
http://www.courttv.com/trials/spector/071607_ctv.html
Anybody watching?
Did Punkin Pie have a financial interest in witnessing for the defense?
HALP, where are all of you?
W
Oh, this article is good!! She sure doesn't sound very believable to me and now I really wish I'd been able to see this testimony. I did read about her talking about being so despondent herself after Lana's death that she didn't get out of bed for almost a year? Gosh, Lana really must have been some very close friend!! And this kind of reaction contradicts her supposed belief that Lana killed herself, imo.Panthera thanks for the links. Surfing around I found another great article by thedarwinexception, which is fantastic!
CA vs. Spector - A More Modest Slice of Pie
Posted by thedarwinexception on July 16th, 2007
tde terms pie's breasts as elongated zucchini gourds :woohoo: Anyone ever see a smashed up busted pumpkin in the garden? That is the picture I see with Pie's testimony so far!
This is a must read!
-snippet-
And that wasnt the only slip of the tongue or slip of the mind Pie had on direct examination. At one point Rosen was asking her about a specific phone call, and Pie offered You mean after the murder? Oh, I mean, after the shooting? Unfortunate, that. But again, I really think thats the way Pie thinks of the event in her mind, as the murder. Otherwise, why would that phrase be the one topmost in her mind when she is casually thinking of it or referring to it? I mean, I think thats a little like calling your husband by another mans name after 4 years of marriage. That would be a little odd, dont you think? And a little telling?
http://thedarwinexception.wordpress.com/