I still think Rodney Alcaca is a good lead in this case here are some of the reasons why I think so:
1. He would had been 26 to 28 years old and he did lived in LA during this time
2.In 1968 he did attack a little girl and stab her I believe and when a cop came to his house he fled and the officer found her in her own pool of blood. Reet was stabbed a bunch of times as meaning that Rodney first victims in his serial killer career he like stabbing then at some point switch to strangling.
3.The sketch that they have for Reet John, I remember looking at it I was wondering who does that remind me of. It look too similar then on reddit someone mention Rodney and boom I realize yes it does look like Rodney. It been 2015 since they came out with that sketch and isn't it weird that only Rodney looks like the guy from the sketch? no Canadian match up to that sketch. No one has reported someone that could match the sketch from a Montreal high school. Rodney could had possible went up to Montreal and met Reet and lure her back to LA. I am thinking of this because it seems like this John person is not even a person since no one but a known serial killer looks like him.
4. Or Reet bump into Rodney after her and John didn't work and she took a liking to Rodney because he looks a lot like him and she got murdered because of it.
5. Like someone said he did use the name John/Jean and I remember watching a video about him on the stand during his trial him doing different personalities and voices on stand to defend himself maybe he has half



french accent up his sleeve?
6. I don't think Rodney was taking pictures of all his victims I mean the very first one that world start to find out about him was that 8 year old Tori? I think that was her name I don't think the police never found a picture of her in his collection. I think he start taking pictures of his victims, and people around him after 1971 because they didn't know he committed two murders in New York City. The only way they found out he committed those two murders was because of semen samples that by law he has to give. Not because they found pictures of those two women in his photo collection. So it still possible that Reet is a victim and there no photos of her in his collection.
7. The only thing that I can't figure out was why did Rodney not rape Reet then if he was the murderer and then I remember that story of that 15 year old that ran off with him to a cabin in the woods. They were doing sexual activities (I believe it was oral sex) she was consenting to that and she went to the police claiming when he try to strangle her after multiple times of having sex with him. Since no one knows when exactly Reet disappear that could mean she was spending days with Rodney having willing sex with him. He waited a few days then kill her and dump her body. I google how long can semen live in a woman body and apparently only 5 days semen can live. So Rodney semen must had die off before he kill her or they wearing condoms or just been having oral sex. So he can't be linked to this murder.
Oh I just want to add this been bothering me the police that on Reet case only asking public help in finding "John" photo in Montreal high schools. I just want to add Ottawa area is also an English/French city so I think someone should mention to the police officers on this case to maybe also reach out to Ottawa residents about high school yearbooks for John.