- Joined
- Apr 7, 2020
- Messages
- 2,523
- Reaction score
- 34,642
Many more to come!Thank you to everyone who worked to gave back his name, it's amazing to see all these older john/jane does getting identified with recent technology.
Rest in peace Kenneth.
Many more to come!Thank you to everyone who worked to gave back his name, it's amazing to see all these older john/jane does getting identified with recent technology.
Rest in peace Kenneth.
Thanks for the support!You guys are THE BEST!! How very sad that he was never reported missing. Thank you for giving him his name back.
Excited to share that we were able to assist Long Beach Police Department and the FBI in identifying 15-year old Kenneth Nevada Williams, formerly known as Long Beach John Doe.
After 44 Years, Long Beach John Doe is Identified
![]()
After 44 Years, Long Beach John Doe is Identified
After more than four decades, Long Beach John Doe is now known to be Kenneth Nevada Williams, a 15-year-old who had run away from his home in the City of La Puente in 1978dnasolves.com
Agree, I wonder if they'd look into this John Doe: The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)I am really happy to see a Los Angeles case being taken on, there are so many UIDs from LA county still.![]()
Well when you think about it, even the way he was killed doesn't even fit Kraft at all. I think people just jumped to this conclusion bc he was a young male and he was in CA. I find the way people contribute every single murder of a young man in California in the 70s/80s to Kraft so counterproductive. California, even just LA county, is a huge place and you can't assume he was the only predator out there.I'm wondering how Kraft was ruled out as being Kenneth's killer? I'm not expecting any answers to this, just wondering aloud...
I'm just so happy he can go home now and rest easy. RIP Kenneth. You didn't deserve this.![]()
I think it was because he was found within a close distance of a club, and that seemed to line up with one of the unknown kills on Kraft's list. I don't think the linkage was pulled out of nothing. What people do on here is try to make connections. This didn't turn out to be Kraft's work, and that's fine. Kenneth got his name back. That's all that matters. Because he was never reported missing, it's unlikely we would have stumbled across him as a potential for this Doe anyway. I don't think coming up with ideas like linkage to potential serials is counterproductive, even if it turns out to be wrong. All our hearts are in the right place here, we just want to be able to send these people home. We can't do what Othram and the other labs do; all we can do is use our brains, look through old archives of records and newspapers and yearbooks. What matters is remaining open to possibilities, and I don't think anyone felt Kenneth was 100% for sure killed by Kraft, just that it was possible.Well when you think about it, even the way he was killed doesn't even fit Kraft at all. I think people just jumped to this conclusion bc he was a young male and he was in CA. I find the way people contribute every single murder of a young man in California in the 70s/80s to Kraft so counterproductive. California, even just LA county, is a huge place and you can't assume he was the only predator out there.
Thank you! We feel much the same.How bittersweet this is. I'm so relieved and glad he has his name back, but at the same time, my heart is breaking for this young man, his family and friends.
Thank you for all you do, @othram. You do truly amazing work reuniting these families with their long, lost loved ones.
According to The Signal Tribune:
"Kenneth... was enrolled in Fairgrove Academy on Oct. 18, 1977, but the last day he attended school was Oct. 27, 1977...
Kenneth’s body was found on June 3, 1978, on Division Street east of Corona Avenue in Long Beach."
The distance from the middle school to where he was found is only 30 miles.
I know people didn't travel as much back then as they do now, but still... seems pretty close to have gone seven months without being noticed.
Then again, the article mentions that Kenneth "was a runaway from La Puente who had never been reported missing." (Wonder what that's about.) If no one was looking for him, it makes sense he could be nearby without being seen.
Thank you, that was well saidThe family may very well have been looking for him in the best way they knew how. Don't forget that there was no national database, nor were there any internet searches available back when the lad disappeared. They could have thought that he was enjoying life somewhere, with no thoughts that he could be dead. Even if they saw the reconstruction, they may have dismissed it as not being their happy young son or sibling.
The family may very well have been looking for him in the best way they knew how. Don't forget that there was no national database, nor were there any internet searches available back when the lad disappeared. They could have thought that he was enjoying life somewhere, with no thoughts that he could be dead. Even if they saw the reconstruction, they may have dismissed it as not being their happy young son or sibling.
You are probably talking about Jeff Graves, Kraft's ex boyfriend.In my opinion, ruling out Kraft could be a mistake, unless they have DNA that points to a perpetrator. Kraft also had an associate who was probably involved in some of his killings; earlier threads on Kraft refer to LA Times articles that are no longer readily available. The book on Kraft published in 1991 by Dennis McDougal notes an associate of Kraft's who was a suspect in some of his killings, but the suspect died before he could be charged or investigated further.
Yes, Jeff Graves... There's still a lot we don't know about Kraft's activities, and for that matter, Jeff Graves There were deviations from Kraft's typical patterns, even where his involvement is known, and situations where another person would have had to help Kraft move bodies.You are probably talking about Jeff Graves, Kraft's ex boyfriend.
It is possible he was a chronic runaway. Maybe in their eyes he wasn't "missing" as much as he had just runaway again. Could be that he was one of those kids that wanted to be out and on his own. Also, back in 78 there wasn't as much technology as there is now. I wonder if maybe they called the police the 7th or 8th time he ran away and a missing report just wasn't filed. Considering he would be almost 60 now, it's possible his parents or guardians are no longer alive so some of these questions can't be answered.Awesome that he finally got a name! Tragic that he was so young, though.
I wonder why he was never reported missing..? If I was a parent and my 15 year old went missing, I would be searching hell and high water for them. Crazy how whenever we get a Doe ID'd, it raises even more questions. I'm just glad that he will at least be remembered for his true identity and not just a reconstruction.