I was referring to the claim that the dog's name was chalk and that it was an example of misinformation by the parents.There is no evidence of there being chalk on the patio, either.
I was referring to the claim that the dog's name was chalk and that it was an example of misinformation by the parents.There is no evidence of there being chalk on the patio, either.
"Do not let them go on the dirt" "keep them close" Who exactly are those commands for???? I thought that sounded really odd. Especially for someone going out the gate, away from a 3 and 4 year old. Seriously. How do you expect a 3 and 4 old to not play in the dirt,and stay close while you are running around throwing wood, in the cold, While your wife is warm, inside wrapping gifts?There is no evidence of there being chalk on the patio, either.
"Do not let them go on the dirt" "keep them close" Who exactly are those commands for???? I thought that sounded really odd. Especially for someone going out the gate, away from a 3 and 4 year old. Seriously. How do you expect a 3 and 4 old to not play in the dirt,and stay close while you are running around throwing wood, in the cold, While your wife is warm, inside wrapping gifts?
He pretty much mumbled,and tripped through those words too. Not as clear and concise as "it was cold, I was throwing wood" "My wife was inside wrapping gifts". MOOThere's no pronouns ! So did he leave out pronouns because those words were never actually uttered ? You are right, how are the little boys going to stay out of the dirt unless you stand there and watch them ?
I missed this. How do we know there was no chalk on the patio again? Yikes.There is no evidence of there being chalk on the patio, either.
They might have said they were 'too young' to stay at the grandparents, because they were thinking about the grandparents themselves. Having to care for 4 children above the age of 5 is much easier than adding 2 that are only 3 and 4 to the mix.That basically says that foster parents should use reasonable and prudent standards and they will receive training on what that is. I'm not entirely sure what that means. One thing we do know is that Tw & JW have not behaved reasonably or prudent.
The adoptive parents stated that the missing boys were "too young" to go the grandmothers which is interesting. Maybe she is not allowed to have young children in her home with her other foster children.
From the official family statement:
It should be noted that the two brothers are the youngest of four adopted siblings and share two older siblings who are the biological children of their adoptive parents. That is six children in total who are our primary focus.
I doubt the family is wrong about the kids being adopted.
We don't know for sure. Police may have collected the chalk for evidence. Someone mentioned early on that latent fingerprints could possibly be found on chalk. I'm not sure about DNA but I guess it's possible.I missed this. How do we know there was no chalk on the patio again? Yikes.
Is there a vigil scheduled for tonight? Do we know who is organizing it?
“Them” is a pronoun.There's no pronouns ! So did he leave out pronouns because those words were never actually uttered ? You are right, how are the little boys going to stay out of the dirt unless you stand there and watch them ?
Ok, thanks. I wondered if the family had anything to do with planning it or if the parents will be there."The vigil for the two boys is set for 6 p.m. Jan. 25 at 10717 Aspen Ave. in California City. Candles will be provided for those who attend." Candlelight vigil scheduled for Monday in honor of 2 missing California City boys | KGET 17
The article doesn't say who is organizing it.
Ok, thanks. I wondered if the family had anything to do with planning it or if the parents will be there.
Won't be surprised if they reschedule it, weather not good."The vigil for the two boys is set for 6 p.m. Jan. 25 at 10717 Aspen Ave. in California City. Candles will be provided for those who attend." Candlelight vigil scheduled for Monday in honor of 2 missing California City boys | KGET 17
The article doesn't say who is organizing it.
I wonder about what was in the van that caused them to do the luminol test, and what caused Walker to suspect foul play. Must be something pretty significant to say that, and put the other 4 in protective custody. Why are they are not making a big fuss about any of this. Where are the recent pics that JW said was on their phones? Where are the desperate cries for Orrin, Orson, and the remaining 4, being a thorn in LE side? The silence is deafening. MOOWhere are those sweet boys? I can not believe it has been this long and JW and TW have not admitted the real truth yet . They are both just digging themselves bigger holes IMO
I’m thinking that LE knows the story is made up , and right now they know that these boys are deceased . They also know , that they need to find them , and they are having a hard time Bc those 2 aren’t budging . What does grandma know ? Did she threaten to call the police if they didn’t ? Why that particular day ? What was the relevance of that day ? Only PHONEs given back . Not iPads .
moo
Yeah, I wouldn't expect them to be there either.My assumption was it was being held by the neighbors.
I doubt the parents will show. I certainly wouldn't if I were them.
Some of the conduct from "concerned citizens" has been downright scary.
jmo