CA - Robert Limon, 38, murdered, Tehachapi, 17 Aug 2014

Court On Camera‏ @courtcam17
Sabrina Limon found GUILTY of 1st Degree Murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Not guilty for attempted murder #SabrinaLimon
 
She was found guilty of:
murder
conspiracy to commit murder
soliciting murder
being an accessory after the fact


She was found not guilty of:
attempted murder
poisoning
 
Verdict now uploaded to youtube

[video=youtube;qGtN4eUlW7k]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGtN4eUlW7k[/video]
 
Yes I just watched the sister being interviewed. In complete and utter denial. In the face of all that evidence, she still insists her sister is innocent. "She was a good mom, she would never have done this." Unbelievable.

Ugh. I believe it. I mean, I believe the sister is in denial and won't ever believe her sister did this. There has been some interesting research done in situations like this - I wish i could find it, I probably read it linked here on WS somewhere. I was astounded that in the face of so much physical evidence, loved ones still believed their family member could not possibly do whatever the crime was.

As an aside... OJ believes he didn't do it, too.

Justice for Robert. Finally.
 
The family is convinced that the jury pool was tainted before the jurors were selected. The trial could never have been fair when it was held in Kern County, where so much news coverage of the murder has centered, Hudgins said.

“She was convicted before she got up there. Her story was created before she got on the stand. It should never have been here,” Hudgins said.
http://www.bakersfield.com/news/she...cle_f6b6dda8-a9fc-11e7-84c2-6b4444770d92.html

I find the claim that she couldn't get a fair trial in Kern County ridiculous. This case came to my attention years ago, the majority of news stories I read were from the Victorville Daily Press. Other news outlets which followed the case were in San Bernardino County. Very little was coming out of Kern County, matter of fact I emailed a reporter from Bakersfield to see if he would provide better updates on the case after she was arrested. He said there was little to report, but would provide coverage at trial.

IMVHO, Sabrina's sister has provided some good insight into family dynamics. Karen Hudgins, not much needs to be said. She is obviously not a very stable person, but is Sabrina's "best friend".

Thank you Jury, justice was served.
 
I find the claim that she couldn't get a fair trial in Kern County ridiculous. This case came to my attention years ago, the majority of news stories I read were from the Victorville Daily Press. Other news outlets which followed the case were in San Bernardino County. Very little was coming out of Kern County, matter of fact I emailed a reporter from Bakersfield to see if he would provide better updates on the case after she was arrested. He said there was little to report, but would provide coverage at trial.

IMVHO, Sabrina's sister has provided some good insight into family dynamics. Karen Hudgins, not much needs to be said. She is obviously not a very stable person, but is Sabrina's "best friend".

Thank you Jury, justice was served.

I couldn't agree more.

What is telling to me is that of all the friendship group that knew Rob and Sabrina and I'm not just referring to their 'intimate' friends, but rather colleagues, neighbours and wider circle have all 'sided' (for want of a. better word) with Rob and Rob's family. On the live feed I watched on youtube - there were also live comments and several of the contributors were from the immediate locality. They said that locally, the overwhelming balance of opinion was that she was not only capable of doing what she was accused of, but in their opinion guilty of it.

Her family talk about the fact that the jury didn't know 'the real Sabrina' - the wonderfully sweet natured, genuine, naive, innocent loving mom, who could never, ever have done this. If they knew her, they would realise that.

However, she elected to take the stand in her own defence, and had hours of very gentle and supportive questioning from her own lawyer, which did absolutely nothing to help herself or her case. Far from coming across as genuine, she came across as coquettish and fake. The little girl lost act on a 37 year old woman who had clearly been around the block several times in terms of her sexual behaviour as illustrated by all the evidence (and whose appearance - and I have to careful what I say here as no-one should be judged on how they look - but frankly she is not an attractive woman facially so the cutesy smiles, covert glances, sighs and shrugs to the jury fell flat) and who had been heard, lying repeatedly on camera, in interviews and so on, her attempt to endear herself to the jury failed spectacularly. However, it may be that belief in her own powers of seduction and persuasion was what made her choose to take the stand and it was that, coupled with the testimony of her older sister, her children (unforgivable to involve them in my view) and an ex (possibly current) boyfriend - which was all the defence case had. There was nothing else offered up, apart from a tangential and emotional closing from Mr Terry.

So I am aghast that Mr Terry, Sabrina herself and her 'friend' and family are apparently shocked at the outcome. Did they really think she was going to walk after that painstakingly compiled prosecution case delivered by a hugely competent and eloquent prosecutor in Eric Smith, and the paucity of the defence case that went up against it.

Apparently they plan to appeal, but on what grounds I'm not sure.
 
I think the jury got it right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
when their attempts at exposing "crooked cops" falls flat, they will try with ineffective counsel.

who was her current or former bf? I missed that testimony.. what day was it.

I too am wondering why they trotted her kids out at all. what could they have known about this? reminds me of my step kids mom trotting all her kids, even the ones not party to the case, to family court.

I couldn't agree more.

What is telling to me is that of all the friendship group that knew Rob and Sabrina and I'm not just referring to their 'intimate' friends, but rather colleagues, neighbours and wider circle have all 'sided' (for want of a. better word) with Rob and Rob's family. On the live feed I watched on youtube - there were also live comments and several of the contributors were from the immediate locality. They said that locally, the overwhelming balance of opinion was that she was not only capable of doing what she was accused of, but in their opinion guilty of it.

Her family talk about the fact that the jury didn't know 'the real Sabrina' - the wonderfully sweet natured, genuine, naive, innocent loving mom, who could never, ever have done this. If they knew her, they would realise that.

However, she elected to take the stand in her own defence, and had hours of very gentle and supportive questioning from her own lawyer, which did absolutely nothing to help herself or her case. Far from coming across as genuine, she came across as coquettish and fake. The little girl lost act on a 37 year old woman who had clearly been around the block several times in terms of her sexual behaviour as illustrated by all the evidence (and whose appearance - and I have to careful what I say here as no-one should be judged on how they look - but frankly she is not an attractive woman facially so the cutesy smiles, covert glances, sighs and shrugs to the jury fell flat) and who had been heard, lying repeatedly on camera, in interviews and so on, her attempt to endear herself to the jury failed spectacularly. However, it may be that belief in her own powers of seduction and persuasion was what made her choose to take the stand and it was that, coupled with the testimony of her older sister, her children (unforgivable to involve them in my view) and an ex (possibly current) boyfriend - which was all the defence case had. There was nothing else offered up, apart from a tangential and emotional closing from Mr Terry.

So I am aghast that Mr Terry, Sabrina herself and her 'friend' and family are apparently shocked at the outcome. Did they really think she was going to walk after that painstakingly compiled prosecution case delivered by a hugely competent and eloquent prosecutor in Eric Smith, and the paucity of the defence case that went up against it.

Apparently they plan to appeal, but on what grounds I'm not sure.
 
His name was Dale Smith and he was the final witness for the defence. He and his former wife 'Nicole' had been involved in an 'open relationship' with Rob and Sabrina Limon back in 2008. It only lasted a few months until he and Rob had a 'falling out' but it was never specified what that falling out was about. Dale Smith (if I recall correctly) is also a firefighter.

His wife went on to divorce him and apparently after Rob was killed and Jonathan Hearn arrested, Dale and Sabrina had become very close again. They spent a lot of time together - he would take her and the kids on outings, meals out and so on.

On the live feed I watched, some of those commentating were from the locality, and they surmised that Hearn, locked up facing murder charges - got to hear of Sabrina swanning around on the outside, and spending time with Dale, This knowledge was a contributing factor in Hearn deciding to confess to the murder and tell the police the full storyl about Sabrina's involvement in the planning and cover up of Rob's murder.
 
I couldn't agree more.

What is telling to me is that of all the friendship group that knew Rob and Sabrina and I'm not just referring to their 'intimate' friends, but rather colleagues, neighbours and wider circle have all 'sided' (for want of a. better word) with Rob and Rob's family. On the live feed I watched on youtube - there were also live comments and several of the contributors were from the immediate locality. They said that locally, the overwhelming balance of opinion was that she was not only capable of doing what she was accused of, but in their opinion guilty of it.

Her family talk about the fact that the jury didn't know 'the real Sabrina' - the wonderfully sweet natured, genuine, naive, innocent loving mom, who could never, ever have done this. If they knew her, they would realise that.

However, she elected to take the stand in her own defence, and had hours of very gentle and supportive questioning from her own lawyer, which did absolutely nothing to help herself or her case. Far from coming across as genuine, she came across as coquettish and fake. The little girl lost act on a 37 year old woman who had clearly been around the block several times in terms of her sexual behaviour as illustrated by all the evidence (and whose appearance - and I have to careful what I say here as no-one should be judged on how they look - but frankly she is not an attractive woman facially so the cutesy smiles, covert glances, sighs and shrugs to the jury fell flat) and who had been heard, lying repeatedly on camera, in interviews and so on, her attempt to endear herself to the jury failed spectacularly. However, it may be that belief in her own powers of seduction and persuasion was what made her choose to take the stand and it was that, coupled with the testimony of her older sister, her children (unforgivable to involve them in my view) and an ex (possibly current) boyfriend - which was all the defence case had. There was nothing else offered up, apart from a tangential and emotional closing from Mr Terry.

So I am aghast that Mr Terry, Sabrina herself and her 'friend' and family are apparently shocked at the outcome. Did they really think she was going to walk after that painstakingly compiled prosecution case delivered by a hugely competent and eloquent prosecutor in Eric Smith, and the paucity of the defence case that went up against it.

Apparently they plan to appeal, but on what grounds I'm not sure.

Great post, I agree with all you stated.

I'll add that I viewed Sabrina's facebook page right after Rob was killed. It was full of pictures that gave a unique perspective in hindsight. I remember thinking something was odd about them (mostly group photos). Comments about "swinging" started showing up pretty quickly, seems like it wasn't much of a secret. The photo's then made sense.

Sabrina was not credible on the stand, her demeanor was flat out fake. I can't wait to hear what the basis for the appeal will be. The Judge was flawless, can't imagine what it would be?
 
If you look on youtube there are a number of videos posted by 'The Hearn Family' showing JH's parents and siblings performing as a musical group in church. He is also singing in one of them. As they are in the public domain I hope there isn't a problem in me mentioning them? I won't provide links but anyone wishing to view them can find them easily enough.

I mention them in the context of the type of deeply religious family upbringing JH had and then comparing it to SL's lifestyle - which we have learned so much about during this trial. They could not have been more different.

It really was a case of two worlds collide.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
635
Total visitors
737

Forum statistics

Threads
625,465
Messages
18,504,347
Members
240,807
Latest member
slomoekustomz
Back
Top