Oooooo, dag gum it! Sorry then. You know, all you have to do is give us WSers the word, SIC EM, (maybe we should coin a word to use here at WS, for when ya'll are ready for us to ATTACK someone LOL) and we are all over this...but, we will wait for your command!IsabelaPR said:In this particular case, the DNA needs to be collected by the police. From Harris e-mail
"HAS to be done by a local police officer - rules of evidence collection / chain of evidence"
"the missing persons detective handling your case should take an oral swab from your husband and have it entered to in the CODIS system (Combined DNA Index System). If it is a match, it will link directly to my Jane DOE (who is already in CODIS), or God willing, link to another Jane DOE somewhere else in the country".
Isabela
Ohhh, Shadow, I think we were ALL confused....thanks for asking Isabella to clarify....I was totally misunderstanding!Shadow205 said:Isabella,
Thank you for clarifying that for me. Acutally I do remember the missing Indiana girl. I think that I confused myself, no fault of yours.
So, there is still a possibility that the CA Jane Doe is still Rose. Well Madison PD needs to get on the ball and do the test. Like I said before. Be persistant. If you don't get anywhere with the Detective, repsectfully request to speak to someone higher up the ladder. Keep climbing that ladder until you reach the top if necessary.
The letters are what drew me to this case....I wanted to just LOVE HER UP!ladyhawk said:Just got done rereading Rose's letters. I was looking for the part where she walked 3 nights to a bus station. I am going to try and see where they are located and what towns or cities they may be by.
Rose felt so alone and unloved when she wrote the letters and if she only knew now how many people truly care for her and want to help her . . . I hope one day soon she can read her thread on this forum and see for herself all the loving caring people at WS.
I'm trying to think positive I don't want Rose to be one of the Jane Does.
Debbie
Glad to help. The more exposure she gets the better chance she comes home.IsabelaPR said:Thanks for MIDoes link. . .I completed the form and sent pictures. . .hope they get back to me SOON! Isabela
THese figures are taken from a 2004 study, so I doubt the figures were as high in 1973, but the figures are shocking when you consider 1-2 million runaways are living on the street at any given time in America.Recent statistics cited by the National Runaway Switchboard show that:
1 in 7 kids between the ages of 10 and 18 will run away
Some will return within a few days, but others will remain on the streets and will never return home
<LI>The National Runaway Switchboard handles more than 100,000 phone calls annually The danger of running away gained national attention in 1973 when police discovered the bodies of 27 youths buried in shallow graves in Houston, Texas. Congress passed the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (Title III) in 1974, and Floridas first runaway shelters were created. The Florida Network now offers services throughout Florida, operating 31 youth crisis centers and more than 100 family counseling sites.
According to the National Runaway Switchboard, on any given day between 1.3 and 2.6 million youths live on our nations streets. It is estimated that 5,000 runaway and homeless youths die from assault, illness and suicide in the U.S. every year.
The above was from post #4 on page 1 of this thread. Did anyone ever look at this Rose Cole closer? Rose would have just turned 16 not 17 but according to Julie (former Synanon member) that was pretty common for kids to finish High School at a very early age.shadowangel said:A quick check of some of my resources shows a Rose Leanna Cole who graduated from a high school in NE in June of '73, at which time the Rose in question would have been almost 17.
Most likely a coincidence, but the name does not appear to be all that common and the similiarity in age makes the match intriguing.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.