CA CA-San Diego Co, WhtMale, 40-50, UP94768, Found floating in the surf, Feb 92

phantomstrider

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2022
Messages
1,328
Reaction score
3,049
  • #1


The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

Date Body Found February 17, 1992​

Location Found Cardiff, California​

Estimated Age Range 40-60 years​

Sex Male​

Race/Ethnicity White/Caucasian​

Estimated Age Group Adult-Pre60​

Estimated Year of Death 1992​

Height 6'0" (72 inches), Measured​

Weight 228 lbs, Measured​

Location Cardiff, California 92007​

County San Diego County​

Found On Tribal Land Unknown​

Circumstances of Recovery A man was fishing near Swami's beach when he found the decedent floating in the surf.​

Condition of Remains Not recognizable-Decomposing/putrefaction​

Hair Color Unknown​

Eye Color Unknown​

 
  • #2
Screen Shot 2022-08-30 at 1.41.58 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-08-30 at 1.42.07 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-08-30 at 1.42.14 PM.png

Approximate location
 
  • #3
Estimated PMI is 1992 so possibly up to 6 weeks in the water.

The article posted in the images/documents section reported a vast difference in height/weight as opposed to the actual measurements. Wonder if they re-ran the publication with the correct information.

Also noted that UID only had Nike socks.

1661882494417.jpeg
 
  • #4
I wonder why he would have been wearing only socks?
 
  • #5
I wonder why he would have been wearing only socks?
My thought was that he had trunks and/or sandals on that were pulled off by the current.
 
  • #6
I wonder why he would have been wearing only socks?
He could have been wearing loose-fitting pants w/ or w/o a shirt when he went in the water, and getting jostled around dislodged his clothing until only his tight socks were left. Another possibility is foul play, ofc.
With respect to PMI, I would estimate (with my limited knowledge of decomp!) that he couldn't have been deceased more than a couple weeks... enough time that his hair/scalp could slough off (as hair color is unknown), but not enough time so that his body had started seriously breaking down in terms of disarticulation, large quantity of soft tissue missing, etc (as his height and weight were still measurable).
Wonder what lead the article was referring to? It must not have panned out.
 
  • #7
It doesn't say if they have DNA on him (as far as I can see). Old newspaper articles might shed light on who the missing person was who he was thought to possibly be, unless that's the last article on the case. This seems like a long forgotten case that just recently got online.
 
  • #8
  • #9
  • #10

This is the only person missing from that county within a year or so of the UID’s discovery. He fits the demographics given in newspaper articles but nowhere near the ones listed in NamUs. I couldn’t find any follow up on the missing man they thought this could be.
 
  • #11
  • #12
I wonder if he was too decomposed for them to take finger prints? Probably?
 
  • #13
I wonder if he was too decomposed for them to take finger prints? Probably?
His remains may have been partially eaten by aquatic life, if he was floating face down his fingers could have been too damaged to take prints.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
1,003
Total visitors
1,159

Forum statistics

Threads
632,406
Messages
18,626,059
Members
243,141
Latest member
SandraR
Back
Top