CA CA - Santa Monica, WhtFem 307UFCA, 50-60, fell from 9th floor, Aug'99

[CCart]

i dont think it is Sandra Kirby. It is widely believed that her husband murdered her. And the area she is from is about 6-7 hours away

More like threeish hours. But yeah, her husband probably had something to do with her disappearance.

The hotel she jumped from is now The Huntley, quite pricy. It appears it's 18 stories high, so she jumped from the middle. I was thinking maybe there was a rooftop pool area or a public area that she jumped from, but it doesn't appear so. It looks like it was just a floor of guest rooms. So which window did she go out of?

Her eyebrows are extremely well groomed. The teeth point towards a transient situation, but her eyebrows do not.

 

[CarlK90245]

*Warning: Postmortem Photo*
http://web.archive.org/web/20100527...etail.cfm?proc_flg=S&unid_case_num=1999-05834

I can see it.

Thanks. That version is much clearer and the gap isn't as severe as it looked in the copy that I have.

 

[j123]

This UID's eyebrows are also somewhat distinctive; maybe that can be considered in addition to the teeth when looking for a match.

 

[rosesfromangels]

Poor woman. Looks like it was a hard life. RIP

Why am I thinking she was pushed from that window by a John or pimp?

 

[Melt71]

Los Angeles County Medical Examiner-Coroner
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)


Interesting that Carl noted in one of his posts above that this woman looked more Hispanic in her PM photos than in the recon. Previously there were only 3 ruleouts, not seemingly of Hispanic MPs. Her Namus hasn't been updated in nearly a year.

 

[MadMcGoo]

Slightly off in some areas, but she disappeared from Los Angeles only 2 days prior to the UID’s death. I was able to compare the morgue photo and the sketch but it’s hard to see a lot of Anna’s features. In the actual post mortem, the decedent doesn’t appear to be 50+ and it’s hard to see gray in her hair although I’m not disputing those facts. Just my observations.

Anna Maria Rodriguez

 

[digitective]

Slightly off in some areas, but she disappeared from Los Angeles only 2 days prior to the UID’s death. I was able to compare the morgue photo and the sketch but it’s hard to see a lot of Anna’s features. In the actual post mortem, the decedent doesn’t appear to be 50+ and it’s hard to see gray in her hair although I’m not disputing those facts. Just my observations.
Anna Maria Rodriguez

I think the postmortem photo makes her look older than Anna was (Anna was only 34).

 

[snowgoose]

Warning: postmortem photo

It seems that a new postmortem photo of this Jane Doe was added to NamUs in April 2020. It's different from the one linked earlier in this thread (aside from the broken links that I couldn't access) so just sharing in case others haven't seen it before.

The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

 

[ninetimesfifteen]

Warning: postmortem photo

It seems that a new postmortem photo of this Jane Doe was added to NamUs in April 2020. It's different from the one linked earlier in this thread (aside from the broken links that I couldn't access) so just sharing in case others haven't seen it before.

The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

She looks way younger in that picture.

 

[carbuff]

Here's her NamUs profile.
NamUs UP # 3390

I didn't see anything on NamUS that wasn't on DoeNetwork, but it does have three rule-outs.
For some strange reason, all of the rule-outs begin with a "C" (first names).

RULED OUT:
Carmen Hetrick (Colorado, born 1956)
Cary Huie (Delaware, born 1955)
Colleen Voitik McHugh (Illinois, born 1963)

One more: MP26086 Maria Valdovinos 02/08/1991 Los Angeles CA

Warning, that new post-mortem photo shows right away, as the default picture, so if you don't like looking at that kind of thing...

 

[John/Jane Doe]

Santa Monica Jane Doe on The Doe Network:

307UFCA

 

[Nate_Bro]

Are Debbie Ann Ferris or Patsy L Baker on the rule outs?

 

[Myrrh]

Are Debbie Ann Ferris or Patsy L Baker on the rule outs?

Neither of them are ruled out, here's the current list of rule outs:

 

[iulia]

Her NamUs profile was modified today, just one week after another modification. This made me wonder if she is (close to being) identified, so I took a look at recently modified ladies' profiles and one of them caught my eye: Bonita Maria Gobel, 57 yo, last seen in Kern, California on 12/03/1998. I don't see her on the list of exclusions posted by @Myrrh last year. I wonder if she's been added as an exclusion or if she might be a match.

ETA: link to Bonita's NamUs page: The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

 

[Dogwithabone]

Hi, Bonita Maria Gobel has not been added to the exclusions for UP3390.

Current (25/10/2025) exclusions for UP3390 are still:

Missing Person / NamUs #MP8678 Jennifer Winkler
Date of Last Contact: May 31, 1998
State: TX
County: Gregg


Missing Person / NamUs # Rosemary Butler
Date of Last Contact: January 01, 1996
State: CA
County: San Diego


Missing Person / NamUs #MP24997 Cheryl Seyedin
Date of Last Contact: November 01, 1998
State: OR
County: Jackson


Missing Person / NamUs #MP26086 Maria Valdovinos
Date of Last Contact: February 08, 1991
State: CA
County: Los Angeles

Missing Person / NamUs #MP16945 Colleen Voitik McHugh
Date of Last Contact: April 17, 1994
State: IL
County: Will


Missing Person / NamUs #MP8174 Carmen Hetrick
Date of Last Contact: June 02, 1984
State: CO
County: El Paso

Missing Person / NamUs #MP6948 Cary Huie
Date of Last Contact: January 20, 1998
State: DE
County: New Castle