Bingo LBrennanVW!
Those are the pics from the article from early May!
How appropriate that LB VW would find the VW Jetta pix!:rocker:
That bottom picture. the one I used, that car is on the move in that picture, you can tell.
Bingo LBrennanVW!
Those are the pics from the article from early May!
How appropriate that LB VW would find the VW Jetta pix!:rocker:
There could be a chance then that they actually have footage of AGT out of the car, Sierra, or even the actual abduction.
That would be great in court, and could explain LE's confidence.
Its possible the footage came from the passing bus they say captured footage too. Either way they certainly have him on tape and that is a fat piece of evidence![]()
Most of us would not have become parents at all if we DIDN'T believe the world is a "beautiful place." Would ANYONE have a child if they EXPECTED him or her to be abused, kidnapped, tortured or killed??
Maybe they have a game/wildlife camera mounted to the trunk of one of those trees. :waitasec:
that's what I was hoping it WASN'T yesterday, when I posted it might be 'touch DNA' that they have in both places.
That bottom picture. the one I used, that car is on the move in that picture, you can tell.
That is a good idea...!
The camera would not be placed in a standard surveillance spot if this is the case!
The big question is how solid a case does the DA really have? Finding the body would really help. One possibility would be to drop the charges on Sierra go after him for the sexual assault and get a very long prison sentence. That would buy a little time to investigate the case further. Advances in forensics may work in the prosecution's favor.
"A tracking canine traced Sierra's scent from her house to a point approximately mid-way down her street, where the dog appeared to lose the scent".
So, it WASNT at the end of her driveway...
http://ftpcontent.worldnow.com/kion/statement_of_fact.pdf
From what I can tell, "Touch" DNA was found on Sierra's folded clothing that did not belong to Sierra. It was compared against the California data base of convicted felons and they got a "hit" with Torres, who lived only 7 miles away.
They checked out Torres' car and it was the red Jetta. Reviewing available video's, it was found that Torres' car was "in the area" around the time of the abduction. It is unclear how closely they tie him to the abduction site but the videos shoot down any other alibis. He was definitely "in the area".
A forensic examination of the Jetta turned up "touch" DNA that was "probably" Sierra's. A further study of other sex crimes in the area revealed that Torres could be "100%" linked forensically (we don't have the details) to one assault and is the prime suspect in two others.
That is pretty much the case. Good but not Rock Solid. The big problem is "touch" DNA. It is different from the DNA results were are used to based on blood or semen. It can degrade and give results that are far below the "Billion to one" matches we have come to expect. Sometimes there is real controversy as to whether or not the sample is even a match. You sometimes get "dueling expert witnesses" at trials.
"Touch" DNA is best when you get a "blind hit" with someone who is otherwise a good suspect: ties to the crime scene, history of similar crimes etc. The DNA on Sierra's clothing is compelling evidence if Torres has no other explanation how it got there.
The DNA found in the car is much less solid. Apparently there are fewer "matching points and there are quite possibly many people in the general population besides Sierra that could have provided that DNA.
The big question is how solid a case does the DA really have? Finding the body would really help. One possibility would be to drop the charges on Sierra go after him for the sexual assault and get a very long prison sentence. That would buy a little time to investigate the case further. Advances in forensics may work in the prosecution's favor.
And honestly, had we known this little fact early on it would have saved a whole bunch of needless speculation. It would have been clear very early on that this was most likely an abduction. I remember countless nights wondering if he waited outside her door or went inside her home to snag her.
Information on "43 missing girls in SC County"...most girls missing are not really missing...
http://www.mercurynews.com/campbell/ci_20711534/many-santa-clara-county-sheriffs-missing-girls-arent
"A tracking canine traced Sierra's scent from her house to a point approximately mid-way down her street, where the dog appeared to lose the scent".
So, it WASNT at the end of her driveway...
http://ftpcontent.worldnow.com/kion/statement_of_fact.pdf
And honestly, had we known this little fact early on it would have saved a whole bunch of needless speculation. It would have been clear very early on that this was most likely an abduction. I remember countless nights wondering if he waited outside her door or went inside her home to snag her.
Another thought.. being in a closed, humid container could preserve the contents longer than expect.