~n/t~
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2011
- Messages
- 17,670
- Reaction score
- 89
She tweeted a very similar one on March 14. She tweets lots of silly stuff.
ok thanks. I haven't seen those tweets you're referring to.
She tweeted a very similar one on March 14. She tweets lots of silly stuff.
IMO. That Juicy bag was placed there, not thrown there.. By a female.. Full of rage at Sierra... A jealous rage...
perhaps she placed the bag there in hopes to return to the crime one day and have the bag for herself???
I can't see a male "placing" a bag ... I can see a male chucking the bag... But not secreting a bag... That to me screams female.... Neat, tidy, hidden...
The kidnapper obviously did not go through the contents of the purse... Otherwise in haste, the contents should have been not organized and "neatly folded" IMO...
boy, I sure miss the astrology forum where there is a case like this!
That is not the link I saw.
So it is out there in other articles, too.
Thank you JDB. From your link. Just posted to state that underwear was confirmed.Here is an Article where Cardoza says it is unclear the clothes found are the ones she was wearing.
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Clue-Found-in-Sierra-Lamar-Disappearance-143815416.html
Just checking again, does anyone have a shot of the area where the bag was found?
Thank you JDB. From your link. Just posted to state that underwear was confirmed.
.."Cardoza said a pair of pants, a shirt, a bra and a pair of underwear were neatly folded inside a Juicy brand purse". It was not clear if they were the clothes Sierra put on the morning she was last seen or if they were something she brought along with her. He said they contained no forensic evidence that pointed to a crime or a person of interest in the case. They said they did not release the information earlier because they were waiting on forensic evidence analysis.
Me either, as I would never take anything said by an NG producer as anything more than...speculation/gossip/etc///JMO
Exactly what I sense about this case too!!! The placement of the bag with clothes "neatly folded" in it sounds like a female thing to do - especially if the bag reminds you of someone you don't like. Purses are personal to most women, and the bag being discarded and hidden is a big clue IMHO. If it was a guy involved with the purse, why wouldn't he have just tossed it in a dumptser somewhere - or left it with Sierra, wherever she is? I can't help but think about the Shanda Sharer case back in 1992.
OK this is a direct contradiction from what Sheriff said on Friday-she said NO results had come back on anything...
I would RATHER believe the sheriff, as if the clothes, etc. contained nothing useful, that is a really bad omen for this case. JMO
I could not agree with you more about the damn bag having bugged the crap out of me sense the get go..there is something just not right with it being in the case, period.. it does not fit in more ways than one.. so ill go ahead and say what's been in the back of my mind and the only way I can make the bag fit..
Please hold the tomatoes this is nothing more than a theory of the thousands already listed..
Here goes.. I am not going to even theorize on who the perp could be but rather just give the basics of how I see this purse fitting.. IMO it wasn't ever part of Sierras day.. meaning she never left with those clothes or books in that juicy bag.. IMO that juicy bag did not come into play until after Sierra had already been harmed and possibly even disposed of or hidden.. ..
This article was from a few days after they were found.
Sure, wouldn't any young girl? The thing is with the bag we saw, it has to be carried by hand. That poses a problem when you have books in the other. that leaves no room ro reach their cell easily.
She had to have an awful lot going on with her hands and arms when leaving that house.
I think if there were any angry, jealous, females it would have popped out to LE in her social media. Her friends would know if there was some sort of tift going on and they would have investigated that in the beginning.
I am not convinced those were the cloths that she was wearing that day. I still think they may have been a spare set, taken from the dresser drawers.
I think if someone wanted to make it appear she ran away or was abducted as mentioned earlier, they would have left the stuff tossed in plain sight.
No self respecting Diva would use that strap. So she carried this in her hand with schoolbooks in the other.
My opinion is she didn't. It is not the type of bag you would carry going to school. Whatever happened to backpacks?
That bag bugs the heck out of me and just doesn't fit...nor do its contents.:banghead:
I don't think Smith was contradicting anything. She said she wasn't aware of any results being returned yet. There were no forensic results found on examination according to Cardoza.
I could not agree with you more about the damn bag having bugged the crap out of me sense the get go..there is something just not right with it being in the case, period.. it does not fit in more ways than one.. so ill go ahead and say what's been in the back of my mind and the only way I can make the bag fit..
Please hold the tomatoes this is nothing more than a theory of the thousands already listed..
Here goes.. I am not going to even theorize on who the perp could be but rather just give the basics of how I see this purse fitting.. IMO it wasn't ever part of Sierras day.. meaning she never left with those clothes or books in that juicy bag.. IMO that juicy bag did not come into play until after Sierra had already been harmed and possibly even disposed of or hidden.. I believe the idea about the bag was an afterthought for staging purposes.. I believe that the perp in a desperation to make it look as tho she was either taken on her way to school or had runaway the perp grabs the juicy bag, puts the clothes inside, gathers the school books and goes out and randomly hides these items where they were eventually discovered.. they wanted these items to eventually be found so that it would point toward Sierra being abducted while en route to school.. or that it may even be assumed as some sort of runaway with the clothes packed.. regardless of which one of those the important point is that it completely redirected LE and everyone from the real perp, and the real crime..
Yes, obviously the perp would have to be someone with access to the home.. but I'll leave it at that.. in the above described scenario the bags purpose, the bags contents, and even the bags placement suddenly all fit together..
There it is IMO.. IMO its why we cannot make sense of the damn bag.. jmo, tho and I am making no accusations.. :moo:
Eta: it would also make sense for why her normal things weren't in the bag.. make up, keys, brush, wallet, etc.. because she did not pack the bag.. the perp packed it after the fact as a way to misdirect attention from the real perp and real crime to an abduction or possible runaway.. jmo..
BBM.. Very interesting thought!
IMO: If she did not pack her bag, it is my opinion that a male that didn't know much about teenage girls packed it...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.