- Joined
- Dec 14, 2019
- Messages
- 3,191
- Reaction score
- 14,782
I don’ t think he is speaking to LE , at all…
Why would we only be hearing LE theory? I don't believe convicts come from theories and not the truth.I don’t like to speculate but I still wonder how he lured them in his house. Not easy to move heavy bodies in a basement. Or he invited them over with an excuse (premeditation), or maybe Dan wandered there due to his condition and Stephanie followed, or they were looking for the dog (Opportunity).
I agree that blunt force trauma entails usually hatred and loss of control, but it is horrific also because in terms of timing, it takes more and one of the two had more time to realize the killing of the spouse.
I suppose that since he pleads not guilty, we will only be hearing LE theory but not whatntruly happened ?
I think the OP meant how exactly it played out, step by step. Many times police cannot pin-point exactly how a crime occurred...was there an altercation? or did the accused confront them in their home with the gun and force them out? etc.Why would we only be hearing LE theory? I don't believe convicts come from theories and not the truth.
Perhaps, though sometimes it comes out at trial that police had initial information and strong suspicions but there wasn't yet sufficient evidence of foul play to issue any search warrants.This is exactly what I meant. usually when suspects refuse to speak as in this case, and explain how and why, and there are no witnesses to the crime, prosecution need to derive a theory of how they believe the facts occurred, from the evidence the can gather, and prove it beyond reasonable doubt.
If MRS had not called his sister to tell her he committed murder on his neighbours, I am not sure LE would have found the Menard’s remains as noone in the neighbourhood had seen anything. And it was just next door to them.
I haven't been able to find anything but per the court site, the 4/21 preliminary hearing was moved to 5/5 and is estimated to last two hours.Any news ?