I long ago went cynical about all this. I see the motion as just another delaying tactic that is so common in these high profile murder cases. I don't understand it, but the defense often seems to want to gum up the works and keep their client from answering for his crimes. The courts go along with whatever the defense wants to raise, at whatever point they feel like raising it.
Again, maybe I'm just too cynical, but this is California. As a related example, there are men on Death Row at San Quentin who were sent there in 1980 and have still not been assigned an execution date. Forty years of appeals?? Something is terribly wrong here.
Again, maybe I'm just too cynical, but this is California. As a related example, there are men on Death Row at San Quentin who were sent there in 1980 and have still not been assigned an execution date. Forty years of appeals?? Something is terribly wrong here.