IMHO (yippee SC my home) I don't want to get everyone hipped up but in many cases when our Federal and State government get involved with passing laws they don't turn out in the best possible way. There is in many cases a reactive action versus a proactive action. Sometimes they generalize, over state or understate the problem. That said and I am in NO WAY supporting or condoning sexual offences of any kind. However, a pedophile is a different offender than a peeper/flasher who can emerge as something worse and a serial rapist is different than a pedophile if the rapist focuses on women and not children. It all comes down to the sexual drive and type of sexual attraction. I speak from experience in finding that there has rarely (I can't name one) been a a case where a rapist or pedophile has been released from prison and never committed another sexual crime UNLESS they are so old or dying that they can't do anything. In that case, they may stick with pornography, not that that is a grand solution. IMO it is an addiction like drugs, alcohol, gambling, or anything that is an ongoing struggle to keep from overtaking the individual. There have been cases where a convicted rapist is released and rapes and kills in less than a year. In its barest state, it is like not feeding a caged animal. This is my LONG way of saying I disagree with limited or reduced sexual offence crimes.