Here is the link to the pic of the truck being taken away.
http://qmiphotos.photoshelter.com/image/I0000.U143c7LKTA
http://qmiphotos.photoshelter.com/image/I0000.U143c7LKTA
The reason I find it interesting is that it is a recent news article and the property discussed is a half-mile away from the Garland home. Most likely, the property referred in the article was a topic of conversation at some point with the Garland family as it was clear they were concerned about the development. Out of all the fields and farms that LE has searched this would also fit the criteria and I also feel it stands out because the Garlands have recently talked about it, possibly DG visited the site prior to the public meeting, maybe he kept it in mind as a possibility to hide something. It is my attempt at "no stone left un-turned".
This property if developed would be sculpted and excavated much like the building of a golf course. I'm thinking it would be a bad spot to hide bodies/remains as they would be likely to to discovered in the near future.
Can anyone say if anything new will be revealed at the disclosure proceeding in August, or is it only shared with the defense? JO made comments that would indicate that she hasn't accepted the death of the three... I imagine it would be pure torture for her to not have any further closure till the trial, and LE must have something that could give her that....![]()
It's hard to say but defense council *may* ask for bail at this time.Can anyone say if anything new will be revealed at the disclosure proceeding in August, or is it only shared with the defense? JO made comments that would indicate that she hasn't accepted the death of the three... I imagine it would be pure torture for her to not have any further closure till the trial, and LE must have something that could give her that....![]()
The date coincides with the end of discovery so my *guess* would be that defense will enter a plea, ask for bail and a date for trial will be set. At this time, additional charges may or may not be laid.I am not exactly sure but the proceeding on the 14th may only be to set a date for trial/plea. I work in a law office in Ontario but my firm has never had a file with charges of this magnitude. Maybe someone else has some idea.
I always answer my children's questions truthfully without offering additional information unless they ask. That isn't the end of it though ... we always put the information in context and really talk about it. Do my kids know about this? My son knows more than my daughter because he asks questions about everything and is much more perceptive about these kinds of things. I try to reinforce the likelihood of these things happening is very small. They have more chance of getting hit by a car or even lightening than anything even remotely like this happening. I suppose if the kids hadn't lost their dad last year and been with me when we found my mother-in-law they might be a bit more innocent about the world so maybe wouldn't ask as many questions about things they hear? I always think of NO's brother and how much his perception of the world changed in that moment and it breaks my heart.
The date coincides with the end of discovery so my *guess* would be that defense will enter a plea, ask for bail and a date for trial will be set. At this time, additional charges may or may not be laid.
Funny, I thought about it but I don't think I could get off work to go.Is anyone here going to the next court date?
Interesting article in today's Calgary Sun....
A member of the notorious Red Scorpions gang — based in B.C.’s Lower Mainland — and three associate members have been arrested in Alberta following a coordinated series of search warrants in Red Deer, Airdrie and Calgary.
http://www.calgarysun.com/2014/07/28/red-scorpions-gang-member-arrested-in-red-deer-alert
That is interesting. I wonder if maybe they used AL's truck during the estate sale for delivering furniture to a buyer. They could have taken it for finger prints and tire tread recording as a precautionary.
Just to clarify... I never said it was the first time I heard of *knocking people out* - I said it wouldn't make sense with the blood evidence.
Buttercup, I'm so sorry for your losses and for the losses that your children have suffered. Thank you for sharing your philosophy with on this thread. It is one that resonates with the me and I think will profoundly shape the way your children will live their lives in a positive way.
I believe he planned, monitored the victims and carried out a blitz attack. If all three victims were sleeping, it could be carried out quickly, without screaming and more importantly - the chance of anything going wrong. One blow is all it takes to subdue a victim and if they're sleeping... It's quick, violent and effective.
I have always contended that this horrific crime was simple in its motive, planning and execution. If it was more complex, LE would have released more information and taken longer for an arrest.
BBM
All the perp needs to do is put the gun to the head of one of the family. Then ask them to call for the others, or just wait for them to come looking. Then tie them up one by one.