- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 42,895
- Reaction score
- 126,783
I found JO's quote about DG and him being non-existent to her and KL almost a jab/insult but not said purposefully if that makes sense.
I got the feeling she's saying in a round about way, that her family and KL had no connection and absolutely nothing to do with him. To say someone didn't exist to them are very strong words IMO.
Nathan wasn't supposed to be there, so he wasn't the intended victim. Kathryn and Alvin were intended victims, so there must have been some sort of relationship between the grandparents and the accused. Nathan's mom can distance herself from the accused, but given the circumstances, I don't think that she can distance Garland from the intended victims. Something happened between the parties that resulted in the murders.