Deceased/Not Found Canada - Alvin, 66, & Kathy Liknes, 53, Nathan O'Brien, 5, Calgary, 30 June 2014 - #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #781
  • #782
Yes but I think the 'not suspicious' article was in reference to yet a different body-discovery from the past, and that the body found on Saturday has not bee resolved at all... not from anything I have been able to find.. so you may be quite right that this could have something to do with this case after all! That went completely by me because I misread WHEN the 'not suspicious' story was written, I think?

This article is pretty much all I can find on Saturday's body being found:
http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/body-recovered-from-glenmore-reservoir-1.1911500

Meanwhile, THIS article says 'not suspicious', however it is from over half a year ago!:
http://globalnews.ca/news/866576/body-discovered-in-glenmore-reservoir-2/

Quite true. I just checked, and it has been stated that the body in the reservoir was not suspicious.
 
  • #783
  • #784
I'm going to make a pot of coffee. Anyone else want a cup? Was going to take a nap, but I can't now.
mmmmm Coffee YES PLEASE :). May take a while to come get it you are in another country lol
 
  • #785
Amber alert is cancelled... DG arrested this morning.. LE conference at 2:00
 
  • #786
  • #787
If the case is solved, kudos to the LE for not taking as long as the McStay family case (4+ years).

SB SAR and LE didn't find the McStays. They weren't even looking for them there as they hadn't been given any reason to by SD police. A heroic (in my opinion) member of the public, OHVing did. And reported what he found.

Hikers and outdoor enthusiasts find so many of our missing.
 
  • #788
There was never an Amber Alert in place for the grandparents. The Amber Alert was only for the child.

Oh, I'm sorry, I thought it had been for all 3 of them.
 
  • #789
That, or perhaps there is reason to believe that he will not be found alive.

This is the activation criteria:

1.Law enforcement must confirm that an abduction has taken place.
2.The child must be at risk of serious injury or death.
3.There must be sufficient descriptive information of child, captor, or captor's vehicle to issue an alert.
4.The child must be under 18 years of age.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMBER_Alert

When I said "located" I didn't specify dead or alive for a reason.
 
  • #790
  • #791
  • #792
  • #793
Just getting the website crashed message "It must be Matt's fault"
 
  • #794
Oh dear :(
 
  • #795
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought it had been for all 3 of them.

The alert mentions the grandparents but only that the child may be in the company of them and provides a brief description of all three. The alert itself is/was specific to Nathan.
 
  • #796
Waiting for the press conference, so might as well get this in... either:

a) some evidence developed (forensics, burn barrels, informant, other?)
b) having exhausted all their top leads without much physical evidence, LE has arrested their main suspect in hopes that questioning/pressure/negotiation will develop further leads
 
  • #797
I guess maybe I was right about Garland and his darkness
 
  • #798
Everything is crossed in hopes that a miracle is about to happen.
 
  • #799
My heart is in my throat... I truly hope they have closure for this family. :crying:
 
  • #800
Waiting for the press conference, so might as well get this in... either:

a) some evidence developed (forensics, burn barrels, informant, other?)
b) having exhausted all their top leads without much physical evidence, LE has arrested their main suspect in hopes that questioning/pressure/negotiation will develop further leads


they can't do B without sufficient reason/evidence to do so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
65
Guests online
3,083
Total visitors
3,148

Forum statistics

Threads
632,160
Messages
18,622,891
Members
243,040
Latest member
#bringhomeBlaine
Back
Top