CANADA Canada - Audrey Gleave, 73, Ancaster ON, 30 Dec 2010 #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #381
Excuse my lack of memory - do we KNOW who made the decision to empty out the entire house?

And aren't murder crime scenes taped off for a long time.......longer than this one was!!

OR......were LE just sitting in wait to nail something on DLS? If so, it makes me ill.

:stormingmad:
 
  • #382
We have learned that AG wasn't very tidy and therefore had no visitors. Perhaps she has spoken to her lifetime with LV asking her to quickly resolve everything if something happens. I would have done it that way.

Why all happened so quickly and how this was possible I am also unclear. I think it's disrespectful - and of course risky for the murder charge.
 
  • #383
To FromGermany and everyone: I don't know a whole lot about the "disease" of hoarding but my question is this:

If AG admitted to LV that she was indeed a hoarder why wouldn't AG try to get help? It's like an alcoholic and all drug addicts - it's up to the individual to FIRST admit it.

In my most humble opinion, AG did NOT admit it to anyone nor to herself. If she had admitted it, her house would not have been so cluttered.

What d you peeps think of my theory here? :blushing:

:twocents:
 
  • #384
I have had no return call from LE since I left a message for the detective listed for AG's case. Maybe that is not unusual? Maybe he would just take the info I left and not acknowledge my call? I don't know.

ETA - and here is why, most likely... according to this article, the same detective is in charge of case in the news now, the body discovered near Binbrook this week - http://www.thespec.com/news-story/3851465-clairmont-we-are-not-angry-we-are-in-pain-/

Excuse me for quoting my own post, please... just wanted to report that HPS did follow up with me today, and indicated they would check into the information posted recently here on WS. :)
 
  • #385
Excuse me for quoting my own post, please... just wanted to report that HPS did follow up with me today, and indicated they would check into the information posted recently here on WS. :)
Yeah! Thanks for letting us know!
 
  • #386
To FromGermany and everyone: I don't know a whole lot about the "disease" of hoarding but my question is this:

If AG admitted to LV that she was indeed a hoarder why wouldn't AG try to get help? It's like an alcoholic and all drug addicts - it's up to the individual to FIRST admit it.

In my most humble opinion, AG did NOT admit it to anyone nor to herself. If she had admitted it, her house would not have been so cluttered.

What d you peeps think of my theory here? :blushing:

:twocents:

It's like you are. My sister helps such people professionally. The smartest people sometimes have accumulated so much that they can barely move in the apartment. You do not even create the help also an expensive fee.
 
  • #387
Wondering if people are feeling extra nervous considering Audrey's murderer is still on the loose..

http://www.thespec.com/news-story/3855333-mountain-woman-awakens-to-find-intruder-in-her-bedroom/
" Police are asking homeowners to make sure their doors and windows are locked overnight after two more break-ins on the Mountain.

A woman awoke in the darkness to find a stranger standing in her bedroom early Tuesday morning at a home on Arch Deacon Clark Trail, in the Rymal Road and Garth Street area.

When the startled woman asked what the man was doing, police said he grabbed her purse and fled. It is believed the suspect entered the home through an unlocked sliding rear door. He exited the same way and dumped contents of the purse on the porch. The intruder kept an undisclosed amount of cash"
 
  • #388
I'm excited about your search!!!!!!

<modsnip>

That is NOT our Audrey !!! If you click on that AG's profile name and find all posts, her very first post says she gave birth in 1969 when she was 16. Our Audrey was born in 1937 and would have been 32 y.o. in 1969.

The post that contained that person's personal information has since been removed. She is alive and well and still living in the USA.
 
  • #389
Excuse me for quoting my own post, please... just wanted to report that HPS did follow up with me today, and indicated they would check into the information posted recently here on WS. :)

:rockon:
 
  • #390
That is NOT our Audrey !!! If you click on that AG's profile name and find all posts, her very first post says she gave birth in 1969 when she was 16. Our Audrey was born in 1937 and would have been 32 y.o. in 1969.

The post that contained that person's personal information has since been removed. She is alive and well and still living in the USA.

- I had posted only in reference to discussing the possibility of a child born, I had, in the past posted it, as that was out there in the Internet albeit, not our Audrey. I should have said that as well.
 
  • #391
- I had posted only in reference to discussing the possibility of a child born, I had, in the past posted it, as that was out there in the Internet albeit, not our Audrey. I should have said that as well.

I feel it's a good possibility, as AG married for the first time at age 16!

I wonder how many 16 year olds were married in 1953, just to get married, when they had not even finished high school.

How did this young married couple support themselves at this age?

How long did this marriage last?

So many questions, so many mysteries regarding AG!

Just moo
 
  • #392
Has anyone been able to find a single pic of JV other than his FB page and mug shot? The only pic I've found that I think might be him I posted earlier. Other than that - nada. He definitely is flying under the radar.

moo
 
  • #393
I feel it's a good possibility, as AG married for the first time at age 16!

I wonder how many 16 year olds were married in 1953, just to get married, when they had not even finished high school.

How did this young married couple support themselves at this age?

How long did this marriage last?

So many questions, so many mysteries regarding AG!

Just moo

It's definitely a possibility that she had a child but is also probably NOT the AG that was posting on that forum.

moo
 
  • #394
MODS - Sometimes, by mistake, I close out this window and to find #8 again, I have to type in "Websleuths Audrey Gleave #7" , then scroll to the last post, link to #8, click to last post, in order to find the discussion again! Is there any way that one can find this thread if they're not "in the know"? Why does it never appear on google when one types in "Audrey Gleave"? I'm confused about this???

moo

ETA - I am going to alert this post in the hope that somehow access to the thread might be more readily available to one that might be searching.
 
  • #395
MODS - Sometimes, by mistake, I close out this window and to find #8 again, I have to type in "Websleuths Audrey Gleave #7" , then scroll to the last post, link to #8, click to last post, in order to find the discussion again! Is there any way that one can find this thread if they're not "in the know"? Why does it never appear on google when one types in "Audrey Gleave"? I'm confused about this???

moo

ETA - I am going to alert this post in the hope that somehow access to the thread might be more readily available to one that might be searching.
I added tags, PP, and it showed up in google for me right away.
 
  • #396
  • #397
I added tags, PP, and it showed up in google for me right away.

Oh what a relief that you're here bessie! Thanks!

: )
 
  • #398
That is NOT our Audrey !!! If you click on that AG's profile name and find all posts, her very first post says she gave birth in 1969 when she was 16. Our Audrey was born in 1937 and would have been 32 y.o. in 1969.

The post that contained that person's personal information has since been removed. She is alive and well and still living in the USA.

OMG :confused: Since I am reassured that not AG's whole life is turnedupside down.
 
  • #399
MODS - Sometimes, by mistake, I close out this window and to find #8 again, I have to type in "Websleuths Audrey Gleave #7" , then scroll to the last post, link to #8, click to last post, in order to find the discussion again! Is there any way that one can find this thread if they're not "in the know"? Why does it never appear on google when one types in "Audrey Gleave"? I'm confused about this???

moo

ETA - I am going to alert this post in the hope that somehow access to the thread might be more readily available to one that might be searching.

I always have difficulties ('m new and very unpractised) and find it the fastest currently under Google "Audrey Gleave Websleuths boardreader. This works only in AG's case.
 
  • #400
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
1,433
Total visitors
1,512

Forum statistics

Threads
632,335
Messages
18,624,888
Members
243,096
Latest member
L fred Tliet
Back
Top