Hazel
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,375
- Reaction score
- 148
Thank you for the update and bolded areas. Good to see some news coming from LE.
These points also caught my attention (rs&bbm)
From what we have learned from the description of the crime scene, IMHO it looked sloppy and improvised, not what a professional hit would look like. LE is now saying "apparently premeditated nature" :thinking: not sure if that means the "perpetrator(s)" came prepared with leather belts, or maybe disconnected the surveillance camera(s) in advance?
The Star argued that the “perpetrator(s)” likely already knew what would needed to be done to frustrate the police. Similarly, police said they were worried that, if the public were told who had been interviewed, this would allow the “perpetrator (s)” to approach people who have not been interviewed “with a view to influencing their participation in the investigation.”
Near the end of his affidavit, detective Yim raises the concern of the safety of witnesses.
“Given the violent nature of the crime under investigation, the identification of witnesses raises potential concerns about witness safety. I do not mean to imply that I have knowledge of any specific safety risks,” Yim stated. “I am merely making this connection from the apparently premeditated nature of the homicides being investigated.”