Yes! This’s is what we’ve understood all along. And why search was initially suspended.Might not have been cold enough before he went missing, extremely cold temperatures came after he went missing.
Yes! This’s is what we’ve understood all along. And why search was initially suspended.Might not have been cold enough before he went missing, extremely cold temperatures came after he went missing.
Yes! This’s is what we’ve understood all along. And why search was initially suspended.
Jan 21st it was warm enough outside that we were doing a construction project leaving our house exposed to the outdoor temp all day. This is why I do not believe temp were not low enough yet when he went missing.
From this link - video stating investigators searching feedlots and compost piles on Nicola Ranch. Also stating there is nothing new - that the investigation remains open and a priority and re-searching is being done in areas that were previously covered by snow. Also restating Ben last seen Saturday Jan 26 and riderless horse found Monday morning by a hunter (KR not mentioned by name here).
Thanks for posting. Some info from this report:Not specifically about Ben but relevant FWIW...
B.C. has twice the national rate of missing people, but the province says it’s waiting to act | The Star
I'm certain he's one of the 17 added to the missing page (remaining on the page) since last summer's report.These statistics must scare the heck out of Ben’s family.
From this link - video stating investigators searching feedlots and compost piles on Nicola Ranch. Also stating there is nothing new - that the investigation remains open and a priority and re-searching is being done in areas that were previously covered by snow. Also restating Ben last seen Saturday Jan 26 and riderless horse found Monday morning by a hunter (KR not mentioned by name here).
IMO as well, it's related to the ranch, either in a suspect or the location of the crime. It could be a personal attack from someone who was envious or angry over Ben's position, or over Ben's potential interest in a woman. In any case, the perp would have to have some knowledge how to handle a horse (saddle and bridle), trailer a horse and also have access to certain things belonging to Ben. Maybe a combo of both - a new love (or dating) interest for Ben angering someone he worked with. All my opinion and also keeping in mind the statement LE previously made that Ben was most likely targeted. To me that means he was singled out for some reason and some person wanted him out of the way. JMOSpeculating here
For me, this has always been related to Ben’s position at NR.
Let’s assume Ben was riding Gunny, close by the ranch at 2. Toss out the possibility he was headed to the mountain 2 hours before dark. If someone killed him, they had to have a stall or a trailer to immediately put Gunny in.
Now, assume Ben never rode, but was killed close to his home, maybe in a barn or outbuilding. The perp also had to have access to Ben’s tack & know Bens horse.
IMO, the list of suspects is very short with one primary suspect & another person as an accessory.
What is one the first things an astute business manager would do after settling in? IMO an inventory of the herd & equipment. Did Ben’s findings cause dissension?
Was Ben happy with the established team already in place? Or, was he planning to make some changes?
All moo & speculation.
IMO as well, it's related to the ranch, either in a suspect or the location of the crime. It could be a personal attack from someone who was envious or angry over Ben's position, or over Ben's potential interest in a woman. In any case, the perp would have to have some knowledge how to handle a horse (saddle and bridle), trailer a horse and also have access to certain things belonging to Ben. Maybe a combo of both - a new love (or dating) interest for Ben angering someone he worked with. All my opinion and also keeping in mind the statement LE previously made that Ben was most likely targeted. To me that means he was singled out for some reason and some person wanted him out of the way. JMO
From what I have been told is owner of NR died and kids ended up with but don’t want it. They live Hong Kong. Not stating this is fact just what other locals told me.Good points!
I think either scenario possible. A scorned lover could also be in the ranching industry.
The lack of NR (owner) expressing concern or grief, absolutely no public statement sways me towards work related. Jmo, of course.
Good points!
I think either scenario possible. A scorned lover could also be in the ranching industry.
The lack of NR (owner) expressing concern or grief, absolutely no public statement sways me towards work related. Jmo, of course.
I don't recall reading anything about Ben's family suing anyone. Was that in an MSM article?Regardless of why Ben went missing, how would that prevent the absentee foreign owner from expressing concern or grief over his sudden disappearance? More than likely they didn’t simply because they have no personal connection to the ranch whatsoever.
I recall the possibility of Ben’s family suing NR mentioned earlier but this is Canada. Our legislation involving civil suits is far different than in USA. Unless NR was directly negligent for Ben’s death, they wouldn’t be legally liable for another employees criminal behaviour, if that proves to be what occurred.
I don't recall reading anything about Ben's family suing anyone. Was that in an MSM article?
And without naming names here (it's easy enough to find the owner's name) he is friends with Ben on FB. They must have had some connection, IMO
Ben Tyner
Regardless of why Ben went missing, how would that prevent the absentee foreign owner from expressing concern or grief over his sudden disappearance? More than likely they didn’t simply because they have no personal connection to the ranch whatsoever.
I recall the possibility of Ben’s family suing NR mentioned earlier but this is Canada. Our legislation involving civil suits is far different than in USA. Unless NR was directly negligent for Ben’s death, they wouldn’t be legally liable for another employees criminal behaviour, if that proves to be what occurred.