I
**Further to the medical‑event speculation---FOR DISCUSSION ONLY:
If someone was with him and he experienced a medical crisis, how did he then vanish?
Even if we imagine EW collapses and the visitor panics, freezes, or misinterprets the situation, the next step is still unclear. (as we all know). Eli was not in the unit when firefighters arrived. Based on that alone, the possibilities seem limited to:
• he left the unit before the fire, either voluntarily or under pressure
• he was removed from the unit while unconscious or otherwise unable to leave on his own
I'm sure LE have checked the site for DNA, blood, or anything else that might clue them into what happened next. Was bedding, coat, jacket, boots still there, or gone? Beyond that, we don’t have enough verified information to understand what happened.
Excellent points.
With no details shared from the Fire Marshall’s report, all we have to go on is that EW was not located in the unit, his dog’s remains were located in the unit, and his phone and laptop were destroyed by the fire. LE continues to guard the evidence.
With all the previous timelines I shared regarding how long it takes to get cell phone records, cell tower pings, camera footage, and cell tower dump, I thought there must be exceptions and researched what legislation exists to speed up access to phone records when a person’s safety/wellbeing is believed to be compromised.
What came up is The Ontario Missing Persons Act (2018). This legislation was specifically designed for cases where no crime has been proven yet, but a person's safety is at risk.
Under Section 5, LE can make an "urgent demand" for records (including cell pings and telecommunications) without a court order if they believe the records will assist in locating the person and that the time required to obtain a court order would result in a serious risk of harm to the missing person.
If the "urgent" threshold isn't met but the case is active, they can apply for a Production Order, which is generally faster than a traditional criminal search warrant.
If the LE believe EW is in immediate danger, they can bypass the standard warrant wait times using exigent circumstances.
Major Canadian telecommunications providers have 24/7 Law Enforcement Support desks.
If police declare an exigent emergency, carriers can provide pings and recent activity logs in minutes or hours rather than weeks.
Police can also request a tower dump, which provides a list of every phone that connected to the towers serving 25 Major Street during a specific window.
Investigators then use specialized software to compare these lists. They look for burners or new IMSIs (International Mobile Subscriber Identities) that appeared at the location shortly before the arson/disappearance and hadn't been there previously.
Other ways for family, friends, neighbours, tenants, Wilfrid Laurier, and the last MSM placement supervisors can help speed up the investigation process is to cooperate with the investigation and provide as many details possible that establish a timeline of everywhere EW was 2 weeks prior to the incident with a list of who was in contact with him.
Only LE can ping a phone or demand records, but there are ways to provide these records with the "probable cause" they need to justify these urgent requests to a judge or a carrier:
1. If the family has the login credentials for EW’s Google (Find My Device) or Apple (Find My) accounts, providing these to the police immediately can bypass the carrier entirely and give real-time location data.
2. If friends or family noticed EW talking to someone new or using a different messaging app (Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp) in those two weeks, reporting those specific handles or numbers can help police narrow their request from "all records" to "specific records," which carriers often process faster.
The reward offered by the family for tips leading to EW’s safe shows the family is very active with gathering infornation.
I hope that LE used the Ontario Missing Persons Act in this case.