CANADA Canada - Elizabeth Bain, 22, Scarborough, Ont, 19 June 1990 #2

[sunnyjim]

The only thing you have demonstrated is how little you know about this case.

You have convicted RB on a bunch of circumstantial evidence, and completely ignored all the facts that have exonerated him.

What facts exonerate him? You have an explanation for the disappearing shorts? What is it? Who was the dark haired man sitting beside her just before she was murdered if it wasn't her boyfriend? Do you think an alibi provided only by the suspect and his family should be believed?

 

[Mr Hush]

Who was the dark haired man sitting beside her just before she was murdered

So you know exactly when EB was murdered when LE doesn't even know?

Is there something you know that you are not telling them?

Kind of an odd comment, seeing as there is no proof EB was murdered, or at what point in time the supposed murder took place.

I think I know exactly who you are

 

[sunnyjim]

So you know exactly when EB was murdered when LE doesn't even know?

Is there something you know that you are not telling them?

Kind of an odd comment, seeing as there is no proof EB was murdered, or at what point in time the supposed murder took place.

I think I know exactly who you are

They were sitting at the picnic table around 5:40. They weren't there at around 6. She had a class at 7 and had to go home first. It's clear to me that she was killed while on the way back to her car, at around 6. You seem to have conveniently ignored most of my questions.

 

[Mr Hush]

It's clear to me that she was killed while on the way back to her car, at around 6.

Really?

How would you know that when LE doesn't even know that?

You know something you are not telling them?.....hhhhmmmm

You seem to have pinpointed a 20 minute window when EB was murdered, however LE couldn't even do that, and there still is no proof or evidence EB was murdered at all.

You come onto this website trying to pin this potential murder on RB after RB has been let go.

I think I know exactly who you are, and why you are doing this.......are you afraid of something?

 

[sunnyjim]

Really?

How would you know that when LE doesn't even know that?

You know something you are not telling them?.....hhhhmmmm

You seem to have pinpointed a 20 minute window when EB was murdered, however LE couldn't even do that, and there still is no proof or evidence EB was murdered at all.

I already explained the timing. Why pretend I didn't? I made an assertion and provided facts. Why not just answer my questions?

 

[Mr Hush]

I made an assertion and provided facts.

You have provided zero facts, only speculation, and circumstantial evidence to fit your own narrative as to what you feel might have happened.

You are talking nonsense out of your rear end.

I feel it is very odd that you come to this site to try to make a case to convict RB when RB is a free man.

I know exaclty who you are, and I know exactly why you are doing this.

 

[sunnyjim]

The case seems very personal to you. You're doing nothing but making paranoid accusations, so I'll only be responding to people with serious comments or questions.

 

[Mr Hush]

I'll only be responding to people with serious comments or questions.

How convenient of you.......Only reply to questions that you arbitrarily decide to be serious, and avoid all other relevant questions.

 

[Lexiintoronto]

I don’t think I kept the book, but in Derek Finkels’s book he wrote that Rob much later eventually found a pair of his multi-coloured shorts at his friend’s home who had a pool. They had a reddish/rust stain on them, but tested negative for blood.

Are they *the* shorts a witness saw him wearing that night, we don’t know. From what I know and what was written in the book, Rob seemed to have only a few items of clothing that he wore repeatedly on rotation. I mention this because people around him would be more likely to remember what he wore, and when he was likely to wear it, imo.

I think it was Rob’s sister-in-law that also mentioned Rob wearing the coloured shorts that day, which Rob disagreed with.
He and his family differed on their recollections of what he was wearing that afternoon. Rob’s mother said she saw him leave the home, but Rob said she was asleep. So, recollections varied.

* All of the above is what I learned from ‘No Claim to Mercy’.

I think the main points that bug me were that Rob and Elizabeth seemed to have broken up, but he denies that. She complained that he had been following her. She also didn’t attend his graduation or the ball. Something no girlfriend would miss, imo. Especially as Elizabeth was described by all as attentive and thoughtful. (She did buy him a gift.) Rob said she was working at one of her part-time jobs and was unable to attend. But she bumped into Rob after the ball and didn’t accept an invitation to go to a restaurant with his friends.

No smoking gun, of course, I just don’t understood the situation. People plan for months in advance and most girls put a lot of thought into their outfits.