DianaElaine
Well-Known Member
Jeez that's sick! Using a Bible camp to hide a kidnapped kid! Of all the places.....
BUT, God's presence was there.

Jeez that's sick! Using a Bible camp to hide a kidnapped kid! Of all the places.....
On one hand the father said to the suspect during a presser ' you know as we do that Kienan does not speak. He cannot tell us who you are ' .
In this
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1052996--randall-hopley-faces-charges-of-kidnapping-child-abduction?bn=1
article Paul Hebert says we have been advised not to share what we have learned from Kienan himself. So obviously something has been said verbally - I doubt Kienan can read or write at this point.
Too many conflicting reports. Pleaaaaasee do not let this turn out to be a hoax or some sort of mass training exercise implemented without the knowledge or consent of the community at large. Normally I would never say something like this but dang ... this is a strange one.
I think the dog might have been the one to do the "take down" which may have resulted in RH needing medical assistance.
MOO
Mr. Hopley will be back in court Nov. 9 for a bail hearing. Until then, he will remain in custody, and receive his assessment.
Don't all criminals have a story to tell?
Story = their defense
Casey Anthony had a whole bunch of stories.
One of Randy's biggest issues was personal hygeine - very unkept, generally dirty. ALWAYS. Pictures showing otherwise for purposes of demonstrating possible efforts at disguising himself were photoshopped. Paul Hebert has said many times that Kienan appeared to have been very well cared for during his time away. Could that not be taken to include Kienan's personal care as well ? Hopley does not seem to me to be the type who takes any great pains with his own personal care much less that of a child.
Is it possible that Kienan was indeed taken but not by Hopley ? When Hopley learned that he was the subject of manhunt of epic proportions, he ran like hell - not because he had Kienan, but because he knew he was on the hook for a crime he did not committ.
Of course they do, but I don't remember many police and/or even lawyers using that kind of direct phrase before and/or directly after the arrest. It is generally expected by the public that the "story" will come out at trial.
(of course that didn't happen in the Anthony case.):sick:
That's the way I interpreted it and in my opinion that was what was implied by Hopley having a story to tell.
I don't expect Hopley to hold a news conference or write a book telling the public about the cat & mouse game he played with the RCMP. If he has to tell the public about how badly he was treated as a kid or whatever mental disorders he has.......who cares. Tell it to a judge.
The story we'll get to hear will be whatever will be reported by the media if and when it goes to trial.
What are your thoughts? How did you interpret it?
Describing Hopley as “a great guy” who would “give the shirt off his back to anybody,” Johnson attributed his friend’s alleged behaviour to his failure to take prescribed medication.
“If he doesn’t take his meds, he’s a different person,” Johnson said.
Johnson also said he received a phone call from Hopley prior to his arrest Tuesday in which the wanted man expressed remorse for his actions.
He quoted the man as saying, “My life is over. I gotta go."
Hmmm he's on meds, he calls a friend and is sorry?
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...d-for-accused-in-3-year-old-s-kidnapping?bn=1
Hmmm he's on meds, he calls a friend and is sorry?
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...d-for-accused-in-3-year-old-s-kidnapping?bn=1
Several passersby echoed those sentiments, but they seemed to be a small minority of local residents, most of whom seemed unaware that Hopleys court hearing was taking place