Case Against Darin?

[beesy]

No, you are doing fine. You will learn like we did, as you go. Probably the only way unless you become a cop or lawyer anyway, LOL Shoot, I learn something new everyday.

Actually what I meant is that I misunderstood Mary's comment and took it as an insult. I wasn't talking about my knowledge of true crime.

 

[beesy]

To Beesy from Beesy....are you arguing with yourself these days, girl?

Not with myself, making sure it was understood. Funny question coming from someone who refers to herself in the 3rd person, huh Goody?

 

[beesy]

The only way to tell the sequence of wounds, and this is very limited, is based on how much blood flowed from the wound. No blood indicates the wound was created after the heart stopped beating. Less blood indicates it was not the first wound unless the blood letting was internal. There is no way that I have ever heard of that can tell the actual sequence of wounds.

Of course less blood flow means the heart has stopped beating, blah blah..... No way you have ever heard of means that naturally I am wrong? It's so simple, and you're making it so hard. I've done more research about if it's possible to determine the order of the wounds in SOME cases, and it is possible. You both seem to miss the fact that I keep saying SOME cases. If a victim runs from the attacker after an initial wound, and one could tell that by looking at blood on the floor and blood spatter, cast off, etc! Obviously then that first stab was a wound which did not immediatly kill the victim. An ME would know if the victim would have bled out from the wound or needed to be stabbed again in order to die. I don't understand why you can't see that. It's so simple. You are setting up much more difficult scenerios than I am. I said before: in overkill situations of course they can't tell the order. That's ridiculous and that's not what I said. Ask Dr. Henry Lee if in some cases you can give an educated guess at the order of the wounds and get back with me on that.

 

[Dani_T]

DID NOT!!! :innocent:

Dani_T started it!

What the?

 

[Dani_T]

What are the chances that the fibers would not have fallen out sooner? What are the chances that the brush would not have carted more than one screen fiber around and dropped it along the way? Why were no other screen fibers found anywhere but in the butcher block? <sigh> You can't blame them for trying.

And lets not forget that Hamilton's testimony has absolutely NOTHING about brushing the knife block or the knives. Great detail about every other little itsy bitsy thing he brushed but no knife block

 

[beesy]

Interestingly enough, one author claims their next door neighbor heard Darlie through the fence screaming at them and calling them MF'rs and threatening them with punishment, like "you're really going to get it now." At trial though, Darlie said Darin was the one who was upset about it and Darin claimed it was Darlie who had gotten upset by it. So that seems to be a fact they both want to steer clear of....like who opened the front door first. Something about that also seems to be something neither wants to admit to.

Wow Goody, that's a big statement to make without listing your source. I've got all 4 books and I don't remember reading that in any of them. Was it Babs? She has some easily checked facts wrong in her book. For instance, she said Darlie and Darin had sex on the sofa that night, but tests showed Darlie had no semen anywhere on her. I'd like to read more about that neighbor's statement, would you please find the author's name or the book or article for me?
And you're right, neither can decide who was really mad about the hot tub thing. Frankly, they both should have been pissed. I mean jeez how did those boys splash nearly all of the water out?! Of course, there's a big difference between pissed and killing pissed.

 

[Jeana (DP)]

No, but it sounds like I should check in. But I don't have the link anymore. I had to restore my hard drive a while back and haven't gotten those old links. Can you share?

Sure!

http://on.starblvd.net/meet/sammie

 

[Jeana (DP)]

O, Jeana, I don't know why but I always picture you with dark hair.

Well my roots do need to be done.

 

[accordn2me]

I did some homework. *insert pat my back emoticon*

Devon was 4 when they moved from Bond to Eagle. But I doubt he was a screen cutter then.

17 A. Devon was born June the 14th, 1989.
18 Q. Okay. And, y'all continued to live at
19 the house on Bond Street?
20 A. Yes, we did.

20 Q. Okay. How long was it before y'all
21 moved over on Eagle Drive?
22 A. We moved to our new home on Eagle
23 Drive in 1993.
http://justicefordarlie.net/transcripts/volumes/vol-44.php#2

However, I've been thinking about what you said about those aliens...Goody, I just don't think they were violent. They may have cut the screen but there's no evidence or testimony to support them killing the kids. :crazy:

 

[beesy]

I did some homework. *insert pat my back emoticon*

Devon was 4 when they moved from Bond to Eagle. But I doubt he was a screen cutter then.

17 A. Devon was born June the 14th, 1989.
18 Q. Okay. And, y'all continued to live at
19 the house on Bond Street?
20 A. Yes, we did.

20 Q. Okay. How long was it before y'all
21 moved over on Eagle Drive?
22 A. We moved to our new home on Eagle
23 Drive in 1993.
http://justicefordarlie.net/transcripts/volumes/vol-44.php#2

However, I've been thinking about what you said about those aliens...Goody, I just don't think they were violent. They may have cut the screen but there's no evidence or testimony to support them killing the kids. :crazy:

Ha, good one! We can always go with the cliche of the Routier house being built over an old Indian burial ground. Would that work? Those dang poltergeists

 

[Jeana (DP)]

Ha, good one! We can always go with the cliche of the Routier house being built over an old Indian burial ground. Would that work? Those dang poltergeists

Nope. It was Santa. How else do you explain the deer hair? Had to have been Santa, but instead of his sleigh, he was driving a little black car.

 

[cami]

YA MOMMA DON'T DANCE AND YA DADDY DON'T ROCK-N-ROLL! :dance::dance::dance:

LOL, you two are a riot. Mary it's sarcasm baby.

 

[cami]

Hey Beesy,

Yes I know we have discussed it (although I don't think she 'stormed' off Leeza in a 'huff'. If anything she looked pretty upset and overwhelmed).

However, whenever I have discussed Dana I've always done so as speculation (and have tried to be pretty sensitive to the fact that there are a lot of rumours about her that are pure speculation). Ultimately I think it is just downright suspicious that she wasn't called to testify by the defense as she was the last adult to see both Darin and Darlie that night, could testify to Darlie's (and Darin's) state of mind, could confirm what a wonderful loving mother Darlie said she was and could also confirm that Darlie and Darin were just fine with each other that night when she left home. But they didn't call her. There has to be a reason why. Without knowing the specifics I can only speculate that it was because she either knew something they didn't want said at trial or they knew she would make a bad witness.

But then again the state didn't call her either (as a hostile witness)- why not?

Maybe the state felt they had enough without calling Dana to testify. The defense wouldn't call her as that would have opened her up to cross examination.

oops, note to self, read the whole thread before posting. I see Goody said the same thing.

 

[cami]

Hey, I just work here. Speaking of anything goes, have you been to Starkman's forum lately? LOL

LOL, I have aaahahahahahahahahahahaha

 

[cami]

Well, I know that now. Maybe I should go back and learn ABC's though so I can interpret messages better?

Nah Beesy you just don't know Mary that well as yet. We've been posting together for years Mary, Goody, Jeana and Dani with A2m coming around a bit so we get to know each other's style and can almost read each other's minds. Mary has a quirky sense of humour but she would never demean you, that's not her style--more mine, LOL.

 

[Jeana (DP)]

LOL, I have aaahahahahahahahahahahaha

I almost responded to the woman who said it wasn't "rocket science." I'm wondering how on God's green earth she could possibly try to fool anyone into believing that she knew the first thing about rocket science. :waitasec: :waitasec: If memory serves, she couldn't even spell.

 

[Goody]

Nope. It was Santa. How else do you explain the deer hair? Had to have been Santa, but instead of his sleigh, he was driving a little black car.

I just don't get why no one saw the red wheels or heard the bells? Absolutely mystifying.

 

[Goody]

Maybe the state felt they had enough without calling Dana to testify. The defense wouldn't call her as that would have opened her up to cross examination.

oops, note to self, read the whole thread before posting. I see Goody said the same thing.

Just shows that great minds think alike. Or maybe we've just been listening to lawyers too long. hahahahahaha

 

[Goody]

LOL, I have aaahahahahahahahahahahaha

I went over there but didn't find anything too outrageous. Direct me, old friend.

 

[Goody]

I almost responded to the woman who said it wasn't "rocket science." I'm wondering how on God's green earth she could possibly try to fool anyone into believing that she knew the first thing about rocket science. :waitasec: :waitasec: If memory serves, she couldn't even spell.

I remember that post....part of it anyway. I would have to go look again though to comment. Dern,this old brain!!!