Case Against The Mccanns Is Strong

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #21
  • #22
It takes time to build a case, remember how long it took the PJ to actually interview the McCanns the second time?

There DNA is solid, no matter what anyone says. I seriously doubt that the world's best forensics lab is going to makes errors in that investigation. The McCanns were interviewed a second time based partly on those findings. Along with other incriminating evidence.

There is no reason to re-interview the McCanns at this time because there is nothing further to discuss with them. After all, they refused to answer the questions anyway. When the rest of the forensics come back that will be re-evaluated. The questons will need to be answered. If the McCanns refuse to cooperate with the PJ than the British police will do the questioning. As I have said before, the PJ is trying very hard to be careful and to avoid an international incident.

IMHO...this will not just go away and there is more to come.
 
  • #23
IMHO...this will not just go away and there is more to come.


I agree.Have you all noticed how quite it has been about what they have found/not found in that other apartment and the church area? I think the PJ are not going to let this leak and what they have gathered has been sent off to the labs.So we should be hearing about those results in a couple of weeks.
 
  • #24
I just read in Fox news that the Police is back to the original theory that someone abducted Madeleine? Thoughts?
 
  • #25
It takes time to build a case, remember how long it took the PJ to actually interview the McCanns the second time?

There DNA is solid, no matter what anyone says. I seriously doubt that the world's best forensics lab is going to makes errors in that investigation. The McCanns were interviewed a second time based partly on those findings. Along with other incriminating evidence.

There is no reason to re-interview the McCanns at this time because there is nothing further to discuss with them. After all, they refused to answer the questions anyway. When the rest of the forensics come back that will be re-evaluated. The questons will need to be answered. If the McCanns refuse to cooperate with the PJ than the British police will do the questioning. As I have said before, the PJ is trying very hard to be careful and to avoid an international incident.

IMHO...this will not just go away and there is more to come.

What you say sounds reasonable. However I do note that while I agree that the labs probably did an excellent job I am concerned with how the evidence was collected and when it was collected. Both of those things can change the reliability of the evidence tested, or so I am given to understand from reading various articles on the subject.

Still, all in all, I think you are most likely correct that there may yet be more to come concerning evidence in this case.
 
  • #26
I just read in Fox news that the Police is back to the original theory that someone abducted Madeleine? Thoughts?

I don't trust FoxNews on this case. They are definitely biased in favor of the McCanns, and do not give full details about anything...just headline blurbs from SkyNews, their sister station in the UK.
 
  • #27
I just googled the mccanns, and found some new articles I've not seen posted here.

Headliners:

Gerry demands everyone not to refer to Maddy as Maddie/ Maddy.

Dna evidence. This article named a lab source who spoke concerning the mix ups concerning the dna testing per a family member and he said, with certainty there's no mix up, or contamination concerning the siblings. He said it's impossible the results could be intertwined. Siblings have separate different dna. We all know that folks. That's not new news.

Why are we now questioning dna itself. It does distinguish between each and every individual, even siblings. He also stated they are now awaiting toxicology results. Hmmmm, does that mean they are testing for drugs on any of these children? I sure hope so, for I think it's relevant and should be investigated, being the parents are doctors and have access and knowledge to the world of drugs.

I'm not going to question any dna results in this case, I'm not falling for that spin.

Also, Colomom has named an article about the Father now stating he believes the kidnapper was hiding behind the door when he went in to check on the children at 9:05p.m. A family member states that after 41/2 months he's pondered it and is sure of it now.

Don't know how to bring over links to the threads, just google Gerry MCCann, you'll find the up to the minute articles.

I could go along with the kidnapper, if there is an abduction, having been caught during the attempt, and hiding as Gerry has said. Plus their saying the door was shut and then was ajar. If we can believe them, but I have a hard time believing Gerry. I feel he would have made that known from get jump street.

I'm getting really discouraged about this whole process. Especially the obvious non efforts of adults in the area not looking for Maddy. Where are the good ole samaritans?

Oops, forgot, more info concerning the pet crematory too in that page that pulled about on the google. The owner of the crematory stated he kept all names of clients, and always looked in every bag he cremated. So that should help in knowing Maddy wasn't cremated, unless he's a liar too.
 
  • #28
Interesting that Gerry has changed his story and his timeline once again now that he has hired a new Portuguese defense attorney ("the best on the Iberian Peninsula" croaks the Daily Mail). This attorney gets 700 pounds per hour (is that about $1000 American?).

This is expected to be paid for with the 100,000 pounds donated by Richard Branson to the McCann Defense Fund, accoring to The Mail.
 
  • #29
Kool Look,

Although I have a very low opinion of the McCanns, I don't believe they would ever take Maddie's body to a pet crematorium. That is way out there!
 
  • #30
I just googled the mccanns, and found some new articles I've not seen posted here.

Headliners:

Gerry demands everyone not to refer to Maddy as Maddie/ Maddy.

As soon and Gerry and Kate are cleared of all suspicion, I will go back to Maddie's formal name. Until then, no way in !!!! will I call her anything buy Maddie. I feel like these two people betrayed their daughter's trust in more ways than one and if they are going to insist on calling her by her formal name, then I have to insist on calling her Maddie. Every child deserves a nickname given with love............... for me, that's Maddie.

Salem
 
  • #31
..."that anyone is being charged YET."

There...fixed that.

Still waiting.

If the PJ had anything concrete on the Mc's they would be charged already.
 
  • #32
Still waiting.

If the PJ had anything concrete on the Mc's they would be charged already.

I suppose that depends on your definition of "concrete". I think we all agree that without a body or most especially a confession, that the LE will need to gather empirical evidence. There are still forensics results that have not been returned from Birmingham. Why would the PJ or the British LE risk their case by trying to charge anyone at this stage? It is not necessary, the McCanns are not going anywhere. The PJ will continue to search, continue to be detectives, continue to build their case until they have all their ducks in a row. They will then run it all past the judge who will have the authority to issue any warrants for arrests.

All this may take time and, as for me, I have all the patience in the world. And I have alot of faith in God.
 
  • #33
I suppose that depends on your definition of "concrete". I think we all agree that without a body or most especially a confession, that the LE will need to gather empirical evidence. There are still forensics results that have not been returned from Birmingham. Why would the PJ or the British LE risk their case by trying to charge anyone at this stage? It is not necessary, the McCanns are not going anywhere. The PJ will continue to search, continue to be detectives, continue to build their case until they have all their ducks in a row. They will then run it all past the judge who will have the authority to issue any warrants for arrests.

All this may take time and, as for me, I have all the patience in the world. And I have alot of faith in God.

Whats faith in God have to do with anything.

This world is full of injustice, God doesn't always give us the answers we want.

Trying to stitch up the Mc's is a desperate measure by PJ because they have no other real clues/leads.
 
  • #34
Whats faith in God have to do with anything.

This world is full of injustice, God doesn't always give us the answers we want.

Trying to stitch up the Mc's is a desperate measure by PJ because they have no other real clues/leads.

Your opinion of God means nothing to me....IMO your comment was not necessary. I was only stating how I feel...nothing else.

If the "stitch up" as you put it is really going down then that means that Scotland Yard is a part of it, yes?

The PJ are not alone....
 
  • #35
Your opinion of God means nothing to me....IMO your comment was not necessary. I was only stating how I feel...nothing else.

If the "stitch up" as you put it is really going down then that means that Scotland Yard is a part of it, yes?

The PJ are not alone....

You brought up God not me.
I didn't think your comment was neccasary either fwiw.

I am waiting on allll the evidence against the Mc's- you can pretty much gaurantee they have jack- otherwise an arrest would be taking place.
 
  • #36
You brought up God not me.
I didn't think your comment was neccasary either fwiw.

I am waiting on allll the evidence against the Mc's- you can pretty much gaurantee they have jack- otherwise an arrest would be taking place.

I have to agree. It's gone to the judge, yet they aren't even calling the McCann's back for more interviews.

I think the police leaked false info to put pressure on them and it didn't work. It didn't work because they didn't do it, IMO.
 
  • #37
The only reason that the McCanns are not being reinterviewed is that there has been no new evidence since their last interviews, this does not mean that they are home & dry by any means!
 
  • #38
The only reason that the McCanns are not being reinterviewed is that there has been no new evidence since their last interviews, this does not mean that they are home & dry by any means!

Doesn't mean that they're not, either.
 
  • #39
I have to agree. It's gone to the judge, yet they aren't even calling the McCann's back for more interviews.

I think the police leaked false info to put pressure on them and it didn't work. It didn't work because they didn't do it, IMO.
Yes and as unpopular an opinion as that is here, I also don't think the parents did it. BUT I still try to read each post and try to read all the media links posted. I'm waiting for something concrete.
 
  • #40
Yes and as unpopular an opinion as that is here, I also don't think the parents did it. BUT I still try to read each post and try to read all the media links posted. I'm waiting for something concrete.

Me too. I just can't imagine with all these parents are going through that they are being vilified on nothing more than rumor or innuendo. If something concrete comes along, I'll change my tune. I just haven't seen anything yet. IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
1,265
Total visitors
1,397

Forum statistics

Threads
632,395
Messages
18,625,788
Members
243,133
Latest member
nikkisanchez
Back
Top