Casey files for-Indigency; Defense reveals how much it's been paid!

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #361
03/08/2010 Affidavit of Insolvency/Indigency
Found Indigent

Here is a new entry posted just a short time ago on the Clerk of Courts records.


Sorry to quote myself, but it appears that the entry on the Clerk of Courts records has been changed recently to this.

03/08/2010 Affidavit of Insolvency/Indigency
Found not Indigent
03/08/2010 Affidavit of Insolvency/Indigency
Amended as to indigency
 
  • #362
  • #363
Sun, I think we posted at same time.
 
  • #364
Casey Anthony is considered to be indigent
Clerk of Courts finds she meets the guidelines.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...sey-anthony-indigent-20100309,0,4154128.story

but the court docket says this:
03/08/2010 Affidavit of Insolvency/Indigency
Found not Indigent:waitasec:

Now I'm confused - what's going on? Orlando Sentinel's story says she IS indigent.

But I have a question. If she is declared indigent, does she still get to keep her 2 - 300 hundred a month snack money or does she have to put it in the defense pot?
 
  • #365
Now I'm confused - what's going on? Orlando Sentinel's story says she IS indigent.

But I have a question. If she is declared indigent, does she still get to keep her 2 - 300 hundred a month snack money or does she have to put it in the defense pot?

Casey didn't disclose any of her commissary funds on the affidavits. I don't know how that all works.
 
  • #366
Casey didn't disclose any of her commissary funds on the affidavits. I don't know how that all works.

Thanks and can I disclose it for her? Heh heh.
 
  • #367
I'm confused too, have no idea why it went from indigent to not found indigent, maybe just an error?
 
  • #368
I'm confused too, have no idea why it went from indigent to not found indigent, maybe just an error?

Maybe Stan looked over from where he is sitting on his rainbow and said just a darn minute - I want a closer look at this. Hold off on that rubber stamp.
 
  • #369
Interesting. What are the implications of her being not indigent I wonder...can't be good news for the defense I imagine.
 
  • #370
Interesting. What are the implications of her being not indigent I wonder...can't be good news for the defense I imagine.

Maybe JS is aware of how much KC was paid for those pictures. JMO
 
  • #371
But wouldn't this statement be hearsay :floorlaugh:

There is a 1099 from ABC somewhere. Who is going to file it on their taxes this year?
 
  • #372
There is a 1099 from ABC somewhere. Who is going to file it on their taxes this year?

The party named. I for one would be very interested to see that 1099. In fact.........is it possible to request a copy of it from ABC directly citing concern over alleged illegal "pay for news" activities??????

Let me see what I can find regarding requests of that nature.

So far looks like a stockholder can request info as it would be included in an annual report.
 
  • #373
There is a 1099 from ABC somewhere. Who is going to file it on their taxes this year?

To Whomever the check was issued...........ahhh the big mystery question. We have KC who as per her affidavit had zero income, JB who states KC paid his almost $90,000 fees thus far and the Anthony's who also claim to have not received these funds, yet they sport their new wares and go on a cruise while their home is in foreclosure. Hummmm......:waitasec: The date of the payment is as pertinent as much as the who. IMHO
 
  • #374
IMO, the fact that LP bonded Casey out of jail did not make it easier for Casey to sell videos and photos. All Casey had to do was tell her mother or Baez, "go to my dresser or puter and there are videos and pics there that I want you to sell for me."

I don't think Cindy or George would have given them to Baez. Sold them, themselves, yes . . . but they would have cut Baez out of it for sure. I think Casey did this without their knowledge. They just had to go with it.

What was done was done.
 
  • #375
03/08/2010 Affidavit of Insolvency/Indigency
Found Indigent

Here is a new entry posted just a short time ago on the Clerk of Courts records.

imagine that ... Sorry, Florida, really, I am. Times are hard, and now you have to foot HER bill.
 
  • #376
  • #377
It would have been issued in early 09 for fees paying in 2008. It would correlate with the 4th quarter of their yr.......I doubt their fiscal year is based upon a calendar year. Let me tell you.....I would bet anything that it WAS NOT paid to KC directly or to her family and that is was funneled through a company owned by a spokesperson or in a corporate entity set up specifically for these fees. They may have made arrangements to accept fees on her behalf....or have received rights to the photos to sell. I would bet that KC assigned rights to those photos to a third party and that the third party brokered the deal (think ethics attorney consultation) Unless we can find it in a report from ABC.....it is likely buried so deep in a corporate shell that it would be virtually untraceable for us.

Let's remember the continual mantra.......anonymous benefactor........I hear.........benefactor that allowed her to remain anonymous. This person is likely the same one that has been "donating to her defense".....BUT when HER funds balance drop...the benefactor will as well. JMO
 
  • #378
The party named. I for one would be very interested to see that 1099. In fact.........is it possible to request a copy of it from ABC directly citing concern over alleged illegal "pay for news" activities??????

Let me see what I can find regarding requests of that nature.

So far looks like a stockholder can request info as it would be included in an annual report.

Yes, I, too would like to see this 1099.

I don't think she is indigent. I think there is $100,000 unaccounted for.
 
  • #379
  • #380
The party named. I for one would be very interested to see that 1099. In fact.........is it possible to request a copy of it from ABC directly citing concern over alleged illegal "pay for news" activities??????

Let me see what I can find regarding requests of that nature.

So far looks like a stockholder can request info as it would be included in an annual report.

Yeah, I would think the board members definately see that stuff, maybe the share holders would see the Profit & Loss/Balance Sheet each year, or a CPA's variation on these reports-
The P & L would have it listed under some expense, and depending upon whether their accountant publishes detailed reports, which show each transaction for that particular expense account, you might see her payment in those reports. But that kind of detail would seem a bit much for published reports.
The better likelihood is to find out if KC filed a 1040 for 2008 or 2009, to report this income. Not sure how to find that out, either, maybe SSA or IRS-It never hurts to call the IRS to see what kind of information they will give out-The worst they can say is that its confidential.....

ETA: ABC would have remitted a copy of the 1099 to the IRS for the amount they paid KC, too. But this would have gone in with their return, which is probably giant, maybe on extension, and who knows if that stuff goes under a subsidiary name. I'm thinkin the best way to find out is for the state or John Morgan to ask ABC whether or not they deducted taxes from the check for KC (as some companies or lotteries do as a courtesy). That would tell us if there was money leftover-And even if they did remit her taxes for her, she still has to file a 1040 and show what she earned and what she paid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
3,459
Total visitors
3,575

Forum statistics

Threads
632,618
Messages
18,629,160
Members
243,220
Latest member
JJH2002
Back
Top