Caylee Anthony 2 year old General Discussion #54

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #261
I know. But the possible father has a thread, the familys involvment has a thread. Thats all I am saying

Actually, Ladybass0711, Lee brought the possible father deal up in the interview he did on tv this afternoon. We were discussing the interview on this board. Why is that not permissible?
 
  • #262
Let's put 2 and 2 together --> LE has back preliminary results back... and they'll be possibly (or have already) searching wooded areas/waters/dumpsters.

Sad, sad. :mad:

Very, and I dont believe that there isnt anything else they need in terms of the test completion that matters, unfortunately..
 
  • #263
General to me is anything goes, period.

Me too. Frankly, it gets tiring getting "yelled at". I can't read hundreds upon hundreds of posts and search brings up many things then another search has to start.
General is general is general.
 
  • #264
Same here...and also because I am getting to the point where I am dumbfounded with this whole thing!

Me too - too many cooks in the kitchen sort of thing!
 
  • #265
YUP, what i'm getting out of all this is that we can't rewrite a question that's been written before, or anywhere else.. because it takes up space. But its A OK to copy an entire conversation, regardless of its length, multiple times before we reply.. or take up half a page with a flying fairy haha

sorry.. i'm sure that sounds fresh, but if its space we are worried about then maybe we shouldn't be copying entire posts over and over !! I think i've read that myspace blurb from Cindy about Caylee being taken away from her 100X.

I work, so I come home and read the recap BEFORE coming here cuz I'm so afraid to have someone reprimand me!! Thank God for the recap!! So far its kept me out of trouble :rolleyes: (well, so far.. )


Its not the space I am worried about. Its the fact that this case is going to eventually go to trial, and something will be said at the trial, which we know is inaccurate, but now will have to scroll through 1000's of pages to dispute that what the family member or Defence attorny is saying is inaccurate!!!!!!!!! When we can actually go to the thread with the topic itself and take 5 mins to find what were looking for, rather then 2-4 hourss scrolling through the 1000's of pages, of already rehashed info!

But I guess you will all see how difficult it is to try and find something when this goes to trial.

Trust me, this is not just me having an issue with this. It is a system we have been using, even before I weas a member here! And it works!

But hey, why don't you all see for yourselves!

Done.

IMO!!!!!
 
  • #266
Me too. Frankly, it gets tiring getting "yelled at". I can't read hundreds upon hundreds of posts and search brings up many things then another search has to start.
General is general is general.

:clap::clap::clap:
 
  • #267
Duno about this, but I do know that it is going to be VERY difficult to track down inofrmation when this goes to trial if we keep going like this.

I agree ...
 
  • #268
  • #269
We discussed this at great length earlier.. people on both sides weighed in... some have seen some rather grungy things donated to such things... others seemed to share your perspective.

I know I went back over twenty threads to look. So sorry, will shut my mouth.
 
  • #270
I agree ...

Could we post twice then? Once in general, to try to get readership and response and once in the appropriate category for the sake of keeping things organized for the sake of research? That's just me....
 
  • #271
Gizzy... don't shut your mouth!

I just thought I'd consolidate it as we went back and forth and that's how it ended...

:)
 
  • #272
Its not the space I am worried about. Its the fact that this case is going to eventually go to trial, and something will be said at the trial, which we know is inaccurate, but now will have to scroll through 1000's of pages to dispute that what the family member or Defence attorny is saying is inaccurate!!!!!!!!! When we can actually go to the thread with the topic itself and take 5 mins to find what were looking for, rather then 2-4 hourss scrolling through the 1000's of pages, of already rehashed info!

But I guess you will all see how difficult it is to try and find something when this goes to trial.

Trust me, this is not just me having an issue with this. It is a system we have been using, even before I weas a member here! And it works!

But hey, why don't you all see for yourselves!

Done.

IMO!!!!!

I have actually followed cases from the very beginning to trial. Your daily updates are very appreciated and very well done.
However, I spend hours and can safely say that I have read all posts on this general board.
There really is something to be said about brainstorming on the general thread.

JMHO
 
  • #273
Thank God! I inquired about this in 52 or so.. but it got lost in the mire...

now... did you think he meant they were being looked at as accessories to disappearance? Or, more in regards to obstructing justice...


I don't think they knew what happened in the beginning... I mean.... they contradict one another too much to be on the same page

It was just specualtion with the reporters on fox, but they were saying that they could be held as accomplices, for covering up the murder.
 
  • #274
Let's put 2 and 2 together --> LE has back preliminary results back... and they'll be possibly (or have already) searching wooded areas/waters/dumpsters.

Sad, sad. :mad:

You know you are right. Now that we know LE has preliminary info back from the tests, I find it very interesting that a new search would occur this morning.

The only folks I feel sorry for right about now is LE.

OME
 
  • #275
Man, these tests are taking forever.

That indicates to me that the prelim results was enough for them to start searching for a body. If they were discussing where they might search next... Did you get the same impression?
 
  • #276
  • #277
  • #278
I know I went back over twenty threads to look. So sorry, will shut my mouth.

THi is what I am talking about...getting snapped at for asking a q...if you don't like it, just don't respond...cripe...I'm gonna respond...

I had a fire 3 years ago, we lost everything. Neighbors and friends donated like crazy! I had soooooooo much clothes that I could not use. THey were either ugly or did not fit or way worn out. Maybe it sounds bad but I took an entire truck full to the goodwill. We did receive a LOT of useful things and I was very thankful for every single thing that was given to us, even the junk and I would NEVER have allowed anyone who donated to know that we did not use it.

In my situation, I didn't have media from all over the nation lining my street but if I had, I would have taken everything that was donated to me whether I like it or not and put it away in my house...I would have not given away or thrown away one single thing until I was sure no one was watching..

But then again, if my child was missing I would be going insane and if I wasn't talking and was in jail being charged, my family would not be backing me up.
 
  • #279
Originally Posted by kathyn2 View Post
I haven't seen this discussed here today. Earlier today when all the hullabaloo was going on, Fox had a report on by that good looking young reported. During that interview with that reporter, he stated that he had talked with law enforcement and that they think there are other people involved in this disappearance besides Casey.
Who do you all think is involved? I think her new boyfriend is involved and that he runs with some sort of gang into illicit things. Whats your ideas on what this could all be about.
When I saw the post about this and it mentioned Cindy, George, Lee and a boyfriend, my first thought was that that's why Cindy didn't go see Casey. I thought maybe she was angry that she may end up in jail. When I saw her interview after the formal charges were issued, I thought that's why Cindy said she was so happy about them. Perhaps she was relieved that she wasn't charged also.
 
  • #280
I just feel that some people get home from work or where ever and jump on the site and start asking questions,and it doe's interrupt the flow or the conversation, I have said it before and I'll say it again that you should read back aways before posting. And hopefully I won't get hollered at. I spend at least 2-4 hours every morning reading before I type. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
68
Guests online
3,488
Total visitors
3,556

Forum statistics

Threads
633,426
Messages
18,641,784
Members
243,528
Latest member
gigee
Back
Top