Caylee's Paternity and the report

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
  • #1
I know that there is a thread that indicates that Lee is not the father per the report that was released on 2/18/09. I hate to say what I am about to say, but it does add food for thought:

The documents indicate that Q55 and Q56 did not include DNA or STR typing results. I am not sure what this means, but IMO they did not have an adequate sample of Cindy's DNA.

There is no mention of what happened with George's DNA. I understand that Lee is not the father of Caylee, but why is no comparison to George's DNA indicated in this report?
 
  • #2
I know that there is a thread that indicates that Lee is not the father per the report that was released on 2/18/09. I hate to say what I am about to say, but it does add food for thought:

The documents indicate that Q55 and Q56 did not include DNA or STR typing results. I am not sure what this means, but IMO they did not have an adequate sample of Cindy's DNA.

There is no mention of what happened with George's DNA. I understand that Lee is not the father of Caylee, but why is no comparison to George's DNA indicated in this report?

Because they didn't ask the FBI to compare GA's DNA for paternity. Refer to the doc dump of 1/21/09.
 
  • #3
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
 
  • #4
:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:

I just wanted to quote that so I wouldn't have to retype it. Thanks.
 
  • #5
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
1,270
Total visitors
1,358

Forum statistics

Threads
636,413
Messages
18,696,676
Members
243,666
Latest member
TrynaFigureSumSh¡tOut
Back
Top