Charlie Sheen a pedophile?

[Anngelique]

At the risk of getting tarred and feathered here, I must say I wouldn't put too much faith in any document filed in the middle of a contentious divorce.

And as for fetishizing teenage boys and girls, I don't "get it" myself, but I think most heterosexual men will tell you, if they are honest, that a female's "ideal" age as a sexual object is 16 or 17. There's a reason for all the "She's sixteen, she's beautiful" songs. (I believe Ringo Starr was at least in his 30s when he wrote his.)

And admiring the young (late teens or young-looking early 20s) is pretty common among gay men as well.

Again, not my taste, but not uncommon as I understand it.

But if the accusations from Denise are correct we are not talking about 16/17 year olds. She wrote that they did not have pubic hair yet and looked to be quite young. Most kids have pubic hair by 12 so we are talking between 9-11 most likely. Of course there are early and late developers and always exceptions to the rules.

 

[tybee204]

Angelique

The girls on most of those sites are of age. They wax. The Catholic School Girl thing is a big fetish. It all falls into the same weird mentality as the Girls Gone Wild Videos being such a hot seller.

My sons GF goes to Catholic school and when ever they would come in after school (in her uniform) to the restaraunt all the men would be high fiving my son and saying "Ya, thats what Im talking about".

 

[hollyjokers]

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0424061sheen1.html

Here is the link to the other phone transcripts. He seems to have a little CDRISP in him. Wack job.

 

[Anngelique]

Angelique

The girls on most of those sites are of age. They wax. The Catholic School Girl thing is a big fetish. It all falls into the same weird mentality as the Girls Gone Wild Videos being such a hot seller.

My sons GF goes to Catholic school and when ever they would come in after school (in her uniform) to the restaraunt all the men would be high fiving my son and saying "Ya, thats what Im talking about".

I know MOST are of age... but there are plenty that are not of age and are easily obtainable by anyone with the internet.

 

[miimaa]

I used to like his show but last night's episode turned me off totally. Do you know ANYONE who acts like those characters???? He11 no!! Just trash and too bad because it used to be a funny show.

 

[Jules]

Did anyone see his interview on Entertainment Tonight last night? To me, he came across as a liar. His answers to questions and just his whole attitude about things gave me the creeps. Everyone knows his history with prostitutes and he sat there last night denying it had ever been a problem. His definition of 'problem' and mine differ drastically.

 

[BillyGoatGruff]

At the risk of getting tarred and feathered here, I must say I wouldn't put too much faith in any document filed in the middle of a contentious divorce.

And as for fetishizing teenage boys and girls, I don't "get it" myself, but I think most heterosexual men will tell you, if they are honest, that a female's "ideal" age as a sexual object is 16 or 17. There's a reason for all the "She's sixteen, she's beautiful" songs. (I believe Ringo Starr was at least in his 30s when he wrote his.)

And admiring the young (late teens or young-looking early 20s) is pretty common among gay men as well.

Again, not my taste, but not uncommon as I understand it.

Actually rockabilly legend Johnny Brunette wrote "You're Sixteen" back in the 1950s. Ringo simply covered it.

 

[BillyGoatGruff]

I know MOST are of age... but there are plenty that are not of age and are easily obtainable by anyone with the internet.

If it was 100% identifiable kiddy --and there's no mistaking it when you see it, you don't say things like "Appears" and "Seems", you can TELL they're pre-pubescent--this would involve the cops and she probably wouldn't be using it publicly, as being married to a pedophile is hazardous to her career, but being a wronged/outraged wife/mother is not.

 

[Amraann]

If it was 100% identifiable kiddy --and there's no mistaking it when you see it, you don't say things like "Appears" and "Seems", you can TELL they're pre-pubescent--this would involve the cops and she probably wouldn't be using it publicly, as being married to a pedophile is hazardous to her career, but being a wronged/outraged wife/mother is not.

I think for slanderous and liabilaty issues she would have to say "appeared to be"

 

[Nova]

Actually rockabilly legend Johnny Brunette wrote "You're Sixteen" back in the 1950s. Ringo simply covered it.

Thanks, Billy, I never knew that.

For our purposes here, of course, the point remains that a 30-something man had a massive hit singing about a 16-year-old girl. I always found the cover a tad unsettling, but nobody seemed to find it surprising.

 

[BeeBee]

Uh Oh, Maybe Denise has a reason for all the accusations? Now, could some be true and maybe some not? IMO, If it were me I would have waited awhile after all the accusations against Sheen before kissy pooing with one of my friends husbands.

http://socialitelife.com/2006/04/24/denise_richards_hooks_up_with_richie_sambora.php




April 24, 2006
Denise Richards Hooks Up With Richie Sambora
Filed under: Denise Richards , Hook Ups , Richie Sambora


I wonder how Heather Locklear feels about this since she and Denise Richards are friends.

On Saturday, Richards, 35, and Sambora, 46, the soon-to-be ex-husband of Heather Locklear, arrived at Le Café in the Westlake Village neighborhood outside Los Angeles at about 5 p.m. in separate cars. In the parking lot, the two kissed then walked hand-in-hand, smiling and chatting the entire way as they headed for the restaurant.
Inside, they shared a table in the covered patio where they gazed into each other's eyes and held hands across the table. Eventually, Richards planted a kiss on Sambora's hand – and he returned the gesture, kissing hers. They then kissed again on the lips.

 

[DEPUTYDAWG]

I used to like his show but last night's episode turned me off totally. Do you know ANYONE who acts like those characters???? He11 no!! Just trash and too bad because it used to be a funny show.

Almost by default, I watched some of it, and you're right.
I enjoy the kid, the "mom" (Charlie's and Jon Cryer's), the housekeeper, etc. They hardly had any part in it last night.

 

[tybee204]

I just think alot of stuff gets said and done during ugly custody battles. I have heard things as bad or worse from non celebrities that are fighting over their kids and assets. isnt illegal.

Denise Richards has some softcore nudity 3/way action posted on the internet of herself from movies she has done. its a little hypocrisy IMO

 

[Nova]

I just think alot of stuff gets said and done during ugly custody battles. I have heard things as bad or worse from non celebrities that are fighting over their kids and assets. isnt illegal.

Denise Richards has some softcore nudity 3/way action posted on the internet of herself from movies she has done. its a little hypocrisy IMO

And as was pointed out by one program, now that she has documented her charges in such detail in print, there's no way the kids won't see them someday.

Sad, sad, sad.

 

[kato]

I just think alot of stuff gets said and done during ugly custody battles. I have heard things as bad or worse from non celebrities that are fighting over their kids and assets. isnt illegal.

Denise Richards has some softcore nudity 3/way action posted on the internet of herself from movies she has done. its a little hypocrisy IMO

You're right about that tybee. My sis during her long and nasty divorce (2 yrs.) accused her ex and his dad (grandpa) of sexually molesting my niece thinking it would get her full custody. It didn't work. When she told me she had gone to the police station and filed a report (on X-mas Eve mind you) I about chit my pants. A social worker was there the next day. (Christmas) Well, it backfired on her BIG time. He has primary custody of the 3 kids and the boys don't even see their mom. Plus the 2 guys filed defamation suits against her. The ex for $15 grand which he already won and his dad for $50 grand which is supposed to be going to trial soon. And I got a friggin' subpoeana!

When you accuse someone of serious chit you better have some foolproof proof. You just can't go around leveling baseless accusations.

 

[robinparten]

And as was pointed out by one program, now that she has documented her charges in such detail in print, there's no way the kids won't see them someday.

Sad, sad, sad.

Well, IF he has done the things she alledges, she really had no choice to do what she did. If he was really threatening her life, etc, the best thing she could do was wake sure it was public because now if anything happened to her the spotlight would be on him, for sure.

 

[tybee204]

I think Denise Richards kept her document within the lines of some truth but exagerated and worded to exploit. People say ugly things to each other in a divorce and custody battle. The most explosive claims she makes are of course the ones that cant be documented. His allegeded threats and physical abuse. If he pushed her to the floor whilst holding her infant she should have called the police and had it documented. The transcripts of the phone calls dont shock me. They are the one sided display of what was occuring at the time.

I can guarantee you if at anytime when my children were young if I had taken measures to keep their father away from them and control his right to be a presense in their lives, the messages I would have recieved on my answering machine would have been of the same explosive caliber. Imagine it reversed and your estranged husband controling your access to your children. How nuts would that make you?

 

[Nova]

Is it possible Ms. Richards is involved with Richie Sambora?

Is it possible the charges against Mr. Sheen (even if true in some respects) are an attempt to stave off charges against Ms. Richards because of her relationship with Mr. Sambora?

Or am I just confused about who is doing what to whom?

 

[kato]

Is it possible Ms. Richards is involved with Richie Sambora?

Is it possible the charges against Mr. Sheen (even if true in some respects) are an attempt to stave off charges against Ms. Richards because of her relationship with Mr. Sambora?

Or am I just confused about who is doing what to whom?

LOL I think we're all confused when it comes to celebrity relationships.

 

[Hbgchick]

Who knows whose story is true? I saw Sheen on ET last night denying these accusations of Richards. I sincerily doubt the man is a pedophile, maybe a little kinky but I don't think he's criminally responsible for anything.

One good thing - they've knocked Tom and Katie off of the top thread! Lolol.