Child Care Complaint Sends DCF To Anthonys' Home

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #41
So... if this kid disappears and CA reports it to the police 31 days later... is she going to say that the babysitter did it??? If CA is working as a Nanny, I gotta say that "xannie" would probably be the right name to call her because she appears to be pretty darn medicated in most of her "cameos" that I've seen. JMHO.
 
  • #42
I saw it saw that mentioned in a recent article where Brad Conway said they were looking at their options conerning harassment...so I guess now if you report the Anthony family for anything they will sue you in return. They are pathetic!!!

On the note of DCF being sent there in the first place? HELLO!!! One of the ADULTS in that house was recently Baker Acted is it? for attemtpting suicide! They take children completely AWAY from parents who do the same...so why is it OK again for this child to be cared for in this home? Not to mention that Cindy has been on some seriously strong meds since this all came about and NOTHING they have done since the 911 calls has appeared as sane...who knows what kind of influence or effect she or they combined could have on a young child RIGHT NOW...

Obviously this person who is allowing this is very, uhm, flexible? in their standard of child care...else their child would be NOWHERE near any of this insanity!


This kinda puts an end to the possibility of "someone kidnapped Caylee and I can't tell you who because there are threats to the family, too' excuse for KC.
 
  • #43
Let's not forget that a toddler who resided in the home was killed last year. It hasn't been determined WHO killed her or WHERE she was killed, although we all have our guesses. As a former 10 year DCF employee, I would be very concerned about any child in their care and if a child was found in their care, I would pull said child. This is besides the fact that C is on disability and who knows what meds and G has had the suicide attempt/baker act, however feeble that attempt was. Both are explosive and have shown that in public many times. Yes, I would pull any kids in their care, have the DCF attorneys drag them to court and have the A's demonstrate just how they are actually capable of caring for a child under their current circumstances. They'd fail and would be ordered to NOT have any contact with kids, not in their care. That is what I'd do.

Let me add that it's possible that after the murder trial is over with, there would be the possibility of them watching kids again. But that's another issue for the judge to decide on. But right after a toddler was killed and it's unresolved? No way. Who in their right mind would allow these people to watch their child?

No one in their right mind would. Unless you were a friend with a kid that you could loan them to improve their image in the public eye by being seen in their care... a photo opportunity!
Can you say Media Coach?
 
  • #44
No one in their right mind would. Unless you were a friend with a kid that you could loan them to improve their image in the public eye by being seen in their care... a photo opportunity!
Can you say Media Coach?

Wasn't that child Holly Gagne's daughter? It seems I read that somewhere... here on WS, I thought.

And if that is true, there's your answer who would let the A's keep their child .... HG is an A supporter.
 
  • #45
I think this complaint will result in several things.....

I think it will force the 48 hours producers to admit that this child was basically used as a "prop" for the episode in an effort to present the A family in a more positive light.

I think that the A family will have to admit that it was "just for show".

I think a true DCF complaint would have been kept confidential until the outcome of the investigation.

Since the A family has remained NOTICEABLY quiet in light of the recent Doc DUmp, I think they are using this "other story" as a way of reminding us they are still here..without having to comment on the evidence that was recently released.
 
  • #46
I think this complaint will result in several things.....

I think it will force the 48 hours producers to admit that this child was basically used as a "prop" for the episode in an effort to present the A family in a more positive light.

I think that the A family will have to admit that it was "just for show".

I think a true DCF complaint would have been kept confidential until the outcome of the investigation.

Since the A family has remained NOTICEABLY quiet in light of the recent Doc DUmp, I think they are using this "other story" as a way of reminding us they are still here..without having to comment on the evidence that was recently released.

And, as always when they go at things in a "backward kinda way", it kinda backfires.
 
  • #47
Wasn't that child Holly Gagne's daughter? It seems I read that somewhere... here on WS, I thought.

And if that is true, there's your answer who would let the A's keep their child .... HG is an A supporter.

Yes, I'm sure it was. Can you think of anyone else who might volunteer...?
 
  • #48
I saw it saw that mentioned in a recent article where Brad Conway said they were looking at their options conerning harassment...so I guess now if you report the Anthony family for anything they will sue you in return. They are pathetic!!!

On the note of DCF being sent there in the first place? HELLO!!! One of the ADULTS in that house was recently Baker Acted is it? for attemtpting suicide! They take children completely AWAY from parents who do the same...so why is it OK again for this child to be cared for in this home? Not to mention that Cindy has been on some seriously strong meds since this all came about and NOTHING they have done since the 911 calls has appeared as sane...who knows what kind of influence or effect she or they combined could have on a young child RIGHT NOW...

Obviously this person who is allowing this is very, uhm, flexible? in their standard of child care...else their child would be NOWHERE near any of this insanity!

I agree. I don't see anything wrong with this being reported. It was reported...and then it was up to authorities to decide. I don't feel good about the child being in the home right now...but I do feel better knowing that it was checked out.
I can't see how the Anthony's define this as harassment after what they kept saying about ZGF!
 
  • #49
If the Anthony's were paid for this televised story...then did the young girl receive any money for being filmed???:waitasec:
 
  • #50
If the Anthony's were paid for this televised story...then did the young girl receive any money for being filmed???:waitasec:


THe Anthony's share cash?????? Surely you jest.
 
  • #51
THe Anthony's share cash?????? Surely you jest.

errr...probably not...unless they are seeing it as an investment and as a testament to "the fine caring people they are". Oh...look at the Anthony's...babysitting just to make more money...and because they are so loving...aren't they nice people. I think I'll make a check out to their charity. NOT!!!

I wonder if CA screams/yells at the young girl if she touches the mirror that Cindy is unable to clean?
 
  • #52
Plus the article says the informant only asked if the Anthony's needed a license to babysit. He asked a question...not actually reporting any abuse, etc.

I wonder if he was named because he "e-mailed" the DCF? I am a mandated reporter and have made many a report. (Most of them have been found to be true...:furious:) Laws in my state cite that the names of the reporters of abuse are not revealed unless a judge orders them revealed. (Not saying that a parent cannot sometimes figure out on their own who reported the abuse.) I am only able to call in a report...or fax a report. I am wondering if this person only made an "inquiry" as to them having a license.
 
  • #53
Not sure if this should be here or not. But isn't strange that Cindy is now babysitting someone's child while on disability? :waitasec:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33975580

Curious; can Cindy drive? reword; does CA still drive?

Actually no, sdi is OK with her working, the dollar amount would come into it if she were being paid, but I highly doubt she is. (remember Holly was Caylee's first unpaid babysitter)

Just because CA is capable of babysitting a 4 yr old, doesn't mean she is capable of doing her regular job. sdi cannot force her to take a job at Stop and Shop, just because she can do the work. If she isn't capable of doing her U&C (usual and customary) due to medical/mental/emotional illness she is disabled. works for her, works for you, works for me.

I would not want to hear she was working as a nurse, if she is on meds or otherwise. But Holly's little girl would be about 4, she isn't a toddler. She doesn't need to be watched every second. The house is probably still kid proofed from Caylee.

These people had a life before KC stole it, along with everything else she could get her hands on. Let's let them move on. If they are guilty of anything, they will be brought to justice. If they are only guilty of loving their psychotic daughter too much, well that's going to be their downfall. But until they are charged with a crime, which will make them LE's problem, the less we hear about them the better.

As for GA and his little side trip, that was what, 10 months ago? He didn't hurt anyone, he didn't threaten to hurt anyone, it should be a moot point. (Over and done with) If anyone in their right mind ever had cause to want to end it all, no one I've ever seen in my life, had as much reason as GA.

Millions of people (In the USA it is something like 1 in every 4 people) have a diagnosed mental illness and are never a danger to others. 2.2 million people in America have Schizophrenia alone.

CA
reminds me more and more of someone suffering from disassociation, which would prohibite her from understanding or really absorbing what was/is happening. Everyone but CA doesn't tell the truth, KC would never do anything to hurt Caylee. CA could have witnessed it with her own eyes and still we will never hear her admit the truth about her "best friend" (remember way back when CA said she wanted to be KC's friend). Somehow in the last 13 mos while they haven't been able to be together or even talk together. No longer live together, CA and KC some how have managed to cure all that was coming between them.

Hmmm maybe everyone who pointed out KC losing her place in the family to Caylee were right. Out of sight, out of mind really seems to work for CA.
 
  • #54

Curious; can Cindy drive? reword; does CA still drive?

Actually no, sdi is OK with her working, the dollar amount would come into it if she were being paid, but I highly doubt she is. (remember Holly was Caylee's first unpaid babysitter)

Just because CA is capable of babysitting a 4 yr old, doesn't mean she is capable of doing her regular job. sdi cannot force her to take a job at Stop and Shop, just because she can do the work. If she isn't capable of doing her U&C (usual and customary) due to medical/mental/emotional illness she is disabled. works for her, works for you, works for me.

I would not want to hear she was working as a nurse, if she is on meds or otherwise. But Holly's little girl would be about 4, she isn't a toddler. She doesn't need to be watched every second. The house is probably still kid proofed from Caylee.

These people had a life before KC stole it, along with everything else she could get her hands on. Let's let them move on. If they are guilty of anything, they will be brought to justice. If they are only guilty of loving their psychotic daughter too much, well that's going to be their downfall. But until they are charged with a crime, which will make them LE's problem, the less we hear about them the better.

As for GA and his little side trip, that was what, 10 months ago? He didn't hurt anyone, he didn't threaten to hurt anyone, it should be a moot point. (Over and done with) If anyone in their right mind ever had cause to want to end it all, no one I've ever seen in my life, had as much reason as GA.

Millions of people (In the USA it is something like 1 in every 4 people) have a diagnosed mental illness and are never a danger to others. 2.2 million people in America have Schizophrenia alone.

CA
reminds me more and more of someone suffering from disassociation, which would prohibite her from understanding or really absorbing what was/is happening. Everyone but CA doesn't tell the truth, KC would never do anything to hurt Caylee. CA could have witnessed it with her own eyes and still we will never hear her admit the truth about her "best friend" (remember way back when CA said she wanted to be KC's friend). Somehow in the last 13 mos while they haven't been able to be together or even talk together. No longer live together, CA and KC some how have managed to cure all that was coming between them.

Hmmm maybe everyone who pointed out KC losing her place in the family to Caylee were right. Out of sight, out of mind really seems to work for CA.

Criteria for receiving benefits from a private Insurer policy- such as she probably had from her employment are different to SS Disability. Any work can disqualify your claim... Has she been off work long enough yet to be considered permanently disabled and claim SS?
If she had a short and long term benefits policy, which for her position would be a customary benefit she can claim for up to 2 years...
 
  • #55
CA could have watched the child without letting the world know that was what she was doing to try to heal, if that was her purpose. Bringing national attention to the fact that she was babysitting someone else's child to me is a form of exploration of the child. Same as selling those photos of their granddaughter. I would have given them away if I thought it would stop this type of thing happening to another child. They just continue to make bad choices based on their media guru's advice.

At this point it is a national disgrace that American's put up with this type of behavior encouraged by the media.
 
  • #56
Hello WS :)

Really? It's okay for Cindy to be watching children? Well, to each their own and each parent gets to make all the decisions for their children... maybe that's why so many end up missing and dead.

This is a woman who did nothing to help in finding her missing granddaughter. Cindy who is so innocent and was so manipulated by Casey? That's not the documents or information I have read(see documented information below) but if you want to go there: that does not sound like a person who should be in charge of children. If she couldn't stand up to her own daughter, for the sake of her grandchild, how much protection would she offer a child not related to her?

Isn't this the same woman who cleaned evidence that could have helped find her granddaughter? Who gave the wrong hairbrush to authorities? This is a woman who has tried to stop justice. By their own words, both the Anthony's knew that Casey lied, did not have a job and stole money.

Where does this idea come from that Cindy was trapped by Casey? That Cindy had no control in her own home? That's not what the testimony of those much closer to this family/case:

RG: ...when we went over there to the family BBQ to introduce the families it was obvious who the lead dog was, the lead dog was Cindy, and whatever she wanted to have happen, happened and if she wanted Caylee to do something that's what got done.

RG: "George, I'm getting ready to shake the trees to see if I can find Caylee, please tell me if anything I'm going to do is going to endanger her." George immediately called me(repeats: "immediately called me" after you hear some talking in the back ground) and said he wanted to talk to me, he wasn't avoiding me, here's the answer to your question as to why I'm not doing what you think I should be doing and he said, "because my wife doesn't want me to."

RG: Um, its a house hold that Cindy rules, the only thing that gets is what Cindy wants done and that's the way it is and George, ah, made some mistakes in the past, ah, the gambling which you all know that. Which he talked to me about, and he basically in my opinion had been emasculated since the point. So whatever Cindy wants is what Cindy gets. To me, that still, that wouldn't be enough(inaudible)I'm(inaudible) and that wouldn't stop me from finding what I wanted to find.


BD: ...if there was a vote taken on the street she would be the *****from hell on the street if you understand what I am saying, that mother is, is, shes acting all wonderful and nice now, she is evil and she can, very controlling person, control Casey and, ah, Keo said she would be down at the house in the afternoon when the mother came home from work, and if the dad was there, fine George but if the mother came she'd throw everybody out of the house immediately and see Keo said to me she threw me out because I was Puerto Rican. I don't want to get into all that but she said that her mother just didn't like those people. And then she said Casey would date Puerto Rican boys just to upset her mother because that was a love, hate relationship there, the mother is pretty domineering.

RP: So I know Cindy, a couple of times had threatened Casey, this is through my mom, that if Casey didn't behave and straighten up she would throw her out on the street and file for custody.

RP: ...Cindy, I sad George, and I said, what's up with Casey? I said, you got something to tell me? What's going on here? And they, they go, "what?" And I said, she's expecting? And they looked at me like I was crazy.

RP: Well, so I said Cindy I, I asked my mom and dad because they were there. And I go, mom I said, Casey's pregnant and she goes, "that's what dad and I thought, Cindy swears that she's not pregnant."


Really now...

This is a woman who is a nurse who stood at her brother's wedding with her daughter seven months pregnant and denied it! How can we say that Casey is not in her right mind but Cindy is? This is a woman who either did not know, or did not care that her daughter was seven months pregnant.

This is a woman who has no problem throwing innocent people under the bus. Cindy has actively tried to pin the murder of her granddaughter on an innocent man: Jesse Grund! A man who she, her husband and her daughter tried to fool into thinking he was the father of Caylee!

RG: I told 'em what the lawyer had said, "Well, I don't know anything about that" and I said look, you know what Cindy all bets are off, anybody asks me a direct question about your daughter I'm going to give them a direct answer, said I'm not hiding anything and that's when she began to proceed, "Well, your sons no angel either that I think he's involved somehow." Those were her exact words.


RG: ...and we're trying to figure out how everybody was putting Jesse in the middle of it and Corp Williams said,"Well I'll tell you where you need to look, Cindy Anthony dropping your sons name left and right and he said to me "she's telling people he's involved somehow." So when Cindy repeated to me word for word what Corp Williams said I said you know what Cindy I was talking to somebody in the Sheriff's office the afternoon and they told me you would say that word for word. And so I, it, I said here's what I don't understand you're talking about how special your daughter is, I said she ripped Jesse off for 250.00 dollars. He paid a phone bill for her and she gave Jesse a bad check. Her response was, "Well, she only did it once." Saying well, I guess it's okay it was only once, ya know I said Cindy but here's what's even worse, you knew Jesse was not the father of that baby and the only reason I know that is because George told me so. When the DNA evidence came in her admitted that you both knew the math didn't work. I said so you were gonna allow him to take the fall for a baby that wasn't even his, I said and even that he was still gonna marry your daughter and raise Caylee as his own. And her exact words were, "Well nobody put a gun to his head." And I went you know what Cindy this conversations over I said you won't be hearing from me again, we're done. That told me right then and there a couple of things in my opinion, Cindy's probably as dilusional as Casey is, but also told me that right and wrong was irrelevant, the ends justifying the means which is why I think we are where we are now with numerous people coming back to me and saying they're working hard to frame your son. Ah, somebody from Fox News called and told me that, all of Padilla's people have called me up and said you'd, you'd better got on the move here they are actively trying to frame your son.

Cindy takes no responsibility for her actions, so why should Casey? Her family taught her to lie. Making money off your dead granddaughter by creating phony foundations with kid finders who are known scammers, proves to me that Cindy was and is all about the benjamins...just like she taught her daughter to be.

I guess everyone sees things different. But, the way I see it...Cindy Anthony is the last person who should be in charge of anything, let alone a child.

And really, anyone who thinks Cindy is in her right mind, who thinks she should ever be around any child...has not listened to the hours and hours of interviews she gave with OCSO and the FBI. This is a woman who has no respect for authority, she tried to get good LE men in trouble when all they were trying to do was help find her granddaughter that she supposedly loved. LE asked her and her husband to stop going on TV and telling the world that they were not doing their jobs. She and her husband were repeatedly told by the FBI and LE NOT to go on TV because it would hurt Casey and Caylee and she went right ahead and has had a media blitz like no one has ever seen. This is a woman who accused Tim Miller of stealing money from the Caylee trust fund, a man who has given himself selflessly and tirelessly to helping to find missing children. A man who REALLY had his child taken and murdered...not just a grandmother who's daughter killed her child.

And, I am tired of crappy parents, who should never have been parents in the first place dumping all their badness into their children who go on to do terrible things...getting some automatic "out" by saying that parents are not responsible for their children. If Caylee had grown up and done something terrible and we all knew what kind of Mother Casey was/is/was we sure would give some of that blame to Casey! I am tired of parents taking no responsibility for how they raise their children when they turn out bad but when they are successful we pat them on the back and say "good job!"

You can't have it both ways humanity...which is it? Does how you raise your child have any effect on them as adults or...

Really?

...jmo...
 
  • #57
What bothers me about them anouncing to the world that they have a child in there home again IS so not right.....What if and I say that loosely---There is someone out there to harm 'that child' like they have all said about Caylee...What if...One of the many ppl that they accused are the killer of Caylee...What if.... they try to pretend to have harm done to The child (((to prove that someone else must of killed Caylee))) and I said PRETEND...Hope this makes sense,not alot of sleep...
 
  • #58
What bothers me about them anouncing to the world that they have a child in there home again IS so not right.....What if and I say that loosely---There is someone out there to harm 'that child' like they have all said about Caylee...What if...One of the many ppl that they accused are the killer of Caylee...What if.... they try to pretend to have harm done to The child (((to prove that someone else must of killed Caylee))) and I said PRETEND...Hope this makes sense,not alot of sleep...

Quote Respect HOPE4CAYLEE :)
BBM

Yes. You bring up a great point. According to Cindy and George, but mostly Cindy the "killer" is still out there and the only reason Casey has not and did not co-operate with LE is because she is in fear of what might happen to her family. Why would Cindy bring another innocent child into something like that? Why would any mother allow her child over to the Anthony home knowing that a child killer is on the lose? This is a family who needed protection from those "somebodies" out there who were after their family, who had taken their granddaughter, killed her and dumped her near their home. This is a family who got a gun for protection from these "somebodies."

Really.

...jmo...
 
  • #59
Hello WS :)

Really? It's okay for Cindy to be watching children? Well, to each their own and each parent gets to make all the decisions for their children... maybe that's why so many end up missing and dead.

This is a woman who did nothing to help in finding her missing granddaughter. Cindy who is so innocent and was so manipulated by Casey? That's not the documents or information I have read(see documented information below) but if you want to go there: that does not sound like a person who should be in charge of children. If she couldn't stand up to her own daughter, for the sake of her grandchild, how much protection would she offer a child not related to her?

Isn't this the same woman who cleaned evidence that could have helped find her granddaughter? Who gave the wrong hairbrush to authorities? This is a woman who has tried to stop justice. By their own words, both the Anthony's knew that Casey lied, did not have a job and stole money.

Where does this idea come from that Cindy was trapped by Casey? That Cindy had no control in her own home? That's not what the testimony of those much closer to this family/case:

Snip

:clap::clap::clap:
 
  • #60
Well, to put it in terms they might understand - CA and GA need to wake up and realize if they want to raise any money for that CMA Foundation, (not to mention hold their heads up in public without being completely vilified) they are going to have to sit on the prosecution side for this trial.

Nobody would give to a memorial type organization if the founders sided with the person charged with the murder. Caylee is the asset, KC is the liability. They can love the liability without trying to run her for office and abandoning their one and only asset. Simple opportunistic math that even a delusional person could understand, not to mention PR 101.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
99
Guests online
2,492
Total visitors
2,591

Forum statistics

Threads
632,933
Messages
18,633,829
Members
243,350
Latest member
CJW84
Back
Top