Just-a-Guy
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2010
- Messages
- 418
- Reaction score
- 0
While I am optimistic they have the little <mod snip>, as a lawyer I would say the wording used is vague enough and "hedging" enough that the judge is likely to be very skeptical in the absence of something more. "...involved in child 


case"...could just mean he is related to someone who was just arrested for child 


and has communicated with that person about the charges. Or just about anything. Hoping it's more...but...







