- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,498
- Reaction score
- 3,721
Abundance of Sothis. Thank you Thank you Thank you. LOL at all the Anagrams on this thread. I solved this case and it was a crew. Arrests soon I imagine.
What anagrams? Or do you mean aliases?
Abundance of Sothis. Thank you Thank you Thank you. LOL at all the Anagrams on this thread. I solved this case and it was a crew. Arrests soon I imagine.
They came up with more than that. Everything fit. The only thing they didn't have was the smoking gun (blood or hair trace of the victims).
13 months after the last murder. Not sure how long any hair trace would stay in the car for? Blood would be able to be detected but the CSK likely killed the girls outside the car.
This is the biggest flaw in the case against LW. But it is possible he got a 100% hit rate.
We do know that up until now they do not have DNA.
All evidence points towards slit throats. Apparently CG was not sexually assaulted and JR's body was too decomposed to determine. I'm not serial killer expert but I don't think it's a stretch that a guy who kills women for sexual gratification without having sex also prefers not to have sex with prostitutes.
The search was 13 months after the last murder. They found a receipt for a car detail a couple of days after CG abduction. They also allegedly noticed a tool from a part of a tool set missing that exactly matched injuries that CG sustained.
What they didn't find was any forensic trace or the souvenirs. He likely didn't take the girls to his unit or his parents place. He could have secreted the souvenirs in the middle of the bush somewhere.
It also has to be noted that all the main suspects have been searched and nothing has turned up. Again, these were after an even longer time after LW was searched (years after) when trace evidence was unlikely to be still there.
This is an unknown quantity. Police also could have exaggerated LW's failing. But from what is in DM's book, it is alleged he failed it miserably and that 3rd party psychologists believed his demeanour and behaviour in police interviews was consistent with him being the killer.
???? He hits it out of the park. Probably the only one closer is Judoman but that's even debatable given LW's behavior and response to police pressure.
DM claims that police claim he has a history of violent acts, one act in particular. Unknown if sexual.You're right. There was more than a milkshake. But I think saying "everything fit" is too vague.
Some things were missing:
•Past sexual crimes
He showed up at one prostitute's house. She had no idea how she knew where she lived but she lived at home with her parents and they had no idea that she was a worker.•Past complaints from prostitutes.
As per the above article, would be most unlikely to be present after a week let alone 13 months.•Carpet fibers on the girls' clothes or bodies matching LW's car
This is the million dollar question. To my knowledge there is no known circumstances of LW askig other women to get into his car(besides the decoys)•LW getting the girls in his car
If what DM says is true, no doubt. Apparently was calm, never flustered, and often paused for up to 30 seconds before answering questions.•LW being enough of a mastermind to pull off the abductions, murders, disposals, and leave almost no evidence behind
I can't confirm this to be correct with absolute certainty but the tool wasn't quite conclusive enough for a forensics professional to sign off on it that the missing took definitely cuased the injury.Regarding the missing tool, that is interesting. I don't see a link, so...? I'm willing to go with this possibility for the sake of discussion. But it totally depends on the tool. A bat would not be as conclusive as a handsaw.
He could have masturbated at the scene etc.I get your point about preferring not to have sex with his victims or with prostitutes. But he would not try to substitute a hand job. He would need something else (would not necessarily have to have sex with the prostitute).
His shrink that he used in the aftermath said that. But the shrinks who watched the police tapes said it was typical for a person of innocence to protest their innocence. What did our mate Lance do? None of that. He never complained once. A normal person under intense questioning will snap and say stuff like "**** off. I didn't do it. It's impossible for you to have any evidence because there isn't any. I'm leaving because you can't hold me because you have no evidence", or "no I'm not coming down to the station you bacon ****. I didn't do it so **** off and solve the crime because while you're wasting time talking to me there's a killer out there".I thought a psychologist said LW could not have committed the murders. Let me get back to that later...
Anyone know who this guy is?
Tweet from Feb this year.
[video=twitter;570450416598536192]https://twitter.com/2671949/status/570450416598536192[/video]
Also anyone know if police spokesman (the one replying to Con Bayens allegations) Neil Stanbury is any relation to Jim Stanbury? Nothing suss - just interested to know.
Thanks
...The search was 13 months after the last murder. They found a receipt for a car detail a couple of days after CG abduction. They also allegedly noticed a tool from a part of a tool set missing that exactly matched injuries that CG sustained...
<allegedly>RSBM. Very, very interesting, if it's true. Was the alleged tool used in the abductions or only the murders? Any idea? Was it only used with CG?
One of the reasons why this crime was not linked earlier is due to the MO of the abduction, which from what I recall was a blitz attack, where she was attacked from behind, bag over her head, knocked to the ground and bundled into a van. If this was the MO on all four occasions, it will/has turned the investigation on its head. It also means that it's a single offender.
WEST Australian police say they recognise the intense public interest in the Claremont serial killer case but won't comment on media speculation as it may compromise one of Australia's longest-running investigations.
Post editor Bret Christian said the link would not come as a surprise.
"When the Claremont series began, we went to an ex-FBI profiler in the United States and put the four crimes to him," he told Fairfax Radio.
"And he said, 'I would be looking thoroughly at that first sexual assault. I think that's your bloke.'
"I published this and we got criticised roundly for it and publicly for publishing this opinion, which turned out to be right."
Mr Christian said as far as he knew, police had not identified the man responsible for the 1995 rape, but had re-interviewed thousands of people since originally making the link a number of years ago.
"What's really chilling is that when they [the police] began a cold-case review of the serial killings in 2004 ... they announced they would be examining the disappearance of 16 women," he said.
"So who knows how active and for how long this guy has been before this."
A DETECTIVE who worked on the Claremont serial killer case says a rape in a Perth cemetery one year before the first murder could be "incredibly important" to the investigation.