Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
2 extra clips re -- is this Dixie - ex cctv footage
 

Attachments

  • 38.54 jr there man at 'his' pole still there cctv 00.03.18.jpg
    38.54 jr there man at 'his' pole still there cctv 00.03.18.jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 41
  • 39.09 of 54.02 JR still there man at 'his' pole no longer there cctv 00.03.57.png
    39.09 of 54.02 JR still there man at 'his' pole no longer there cctv 00.03.57.png
    379.3 KB · Views: 40
I think that you are over thinking it. Both JR and CG were decomposed JR more so then CG. I don't care how tough or experienced you are seeing decomposing bodies is never a pleasant experience. Take it from me, there are lots of things I wish I had never seen.

I take your point but have a look at his credentials. Major Crime Division detective superintendent, I'm not sure a decomposed body would "haunt him forever".
 
This really is such a fascinating case, where all POIs could be the SK. Now Dixie looks like his odds have shortened.
 
If it is Dixie then why is Post Newspaper pumping out articles about how they have DNA. Pointless.
 
If it is Dixie then why is Post Newspaper pumping out articles about how they have DNA. Pointless.

As I have continued to say over the last couple of weeks, IF the police in fact do have a DNA match between Rowe Park victim and CG, the material that provides the DNA may not be seminal fluid but hair. One hair sample may have been inside the panelvan (Rowe Park) and transferred onto that victim, and another hair sample onto CG's body.

One of the articles states that Dixie lived / stayed with a mate of a mate (firstly) in Perth. If the mate or his mate owned a panel van and was involved in the Rowe Park rape (13/2/1995), and Dixie had use of that panel van at the time of CG, then there could be DNA found at that CG disposal site, that doesn't match the DNA of Dixie. The same scenario could be played out with other POI / suspects.

I've read another article that detailed the house that Dixie shared at the time of the Leederville rape (1998), with a professionally based woman, in Leederville (or was it Subi). I can recall that she worked in the legal industry in Perth. Now I am trying to find that damned article; it's driving me crazy.

Drug fueled mates together could cause total havoc if they were that way inclined.

It sounds to me, from detail in some of the news articles, that Dixie didn't drive a vehicle in Perth (metro); but he did drive a vehicle when he was in Dunsborough because the 'flashing incident' in Bunbury -- he drove past the woman, did a u-turn, stripped off, then flashed. I wonder if the vehicle he used during that incident was actually his vehicle or was it borrowed ?

Could Dixie have borrowed his mates' vehicle or his mates' mate's vehicle ? Yep.

Look at the trouble they had getting the McMahon inquest together and that proved useless due to the failings of police investigations during the initial stages. Look at the difficulty getting the Dodd inquest together and let's see how they go with that one. Let's see how they go with getting Dorrough convicted too. That will give you a good indication on why they haven't gotten the Coroner involved yet.
 
Sutton said:
We've discussed for three threads how police won't confirm or deny the presence of DNA evidence. I've probably made a hundred posts on the topic myself. No one is stating otherwise.
Unfortunately many people have been claiming police have dna. Parkie and Crabstick are the main offenders but there's others. I think most people now understand that it's still unconfirmed.
 
Do you seriously think they would rule out Dixie, then produce a documentary about the killings and spend the next 10 years investigating, only to arrive back at Dixie?

Given this article - http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/wes...e/news-story/f03e5ef6bc043db96b819aa7e97631fd

What do you suppose the families are being told and why haven't they called for one after 20 years?

How many more years before they do?

I've always wondered why none of the family members are more vocal, almost as if they are content/satisfied with the investigations. What do they know that we don't? Quite a lot I'm sure. I did notice that Jenny Rimmer showed hints of doubt/cynicism in the "He Who Waits" transcript posted a couple of pages back.
 
All photographs of Dixie (aka Turner) show him with very short tight curly hair so I doubt he is MM. But check out the HayleyJane youtube footage at 37.55 mins (before and after this time) -- it's the 23 h 59m 58s cctv timestamp. When Jane and her friends exit the Conti, they make their way to a pole just south of the exit door. There is a guy standing south of the pole. Later the guy moves to just north of the pole, but stays next to it. When (my) MM2 guy exits the Conti, the guy at the pole moves forward towards Jane. Just as MM appears this pole guy brushes his right shoulder and turns his head to face south; I've consider this may have been a sign to MM. The pole guy looks remarkably like Dixie to me.

I've attached a series of clips taken from CIA doc footage to demonstrate above -- 5 in this message and 2 following.

Every person in this video was identified, with the exception of MM (hence his name). There's no MM2.
 
look under section 'mood swings' for date. also look under 'deported to the UK' section -- his hair was described as "curly blond surfer hair" by people that knew him in the UK.
http://courtnewsuk.co.uk/c_sex_killers/a_mark_dixie/crime_vaults/


Looks like he's admitted to the Spanish rapes
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3127667/Killer-Sally-Anne-Bowman-admits-rape-Spain-led-innocent-man-spend-11-years-prison.html


Admitting to the Spanish rapes is a key point in this;

If he'd admit to those, why not admit to CSK? The guy will be in prison for the rest of his life anyway.
 
I've been pretty vocal in my opinion that Dixie was not the CSK. But that's my OPINION, based on his criminal behaviors and my firm belief police have seminal DNA evidence.

GreenDevil just asked for Dixie's timeline, prefacing the question with 'let's spitball some ideas'. Getting down Dixie's timeline is a good idea. It will just serve as further evidence that Dixie is not involved. Or we'll come across something that will change our point-of-view.

Papertrail posted some good articles and Enzeder PM'd me some while helping me with a DropBox problem. I'll compile everything, source it and post it in a day or two.

It's not like there's a ton of new info right now. Discussing reasonable ideas around Mark Dixie can't hurt.
 
lets say there is no connection between CSK AND karrakatta rape,dixie would be an odds on favourite, but judging by all the newspaper coverage on DNA and police stating dixie is not the CSK i think we can forget about the pom
 
I read a FB comment (idk where, one of the news sites) where a woman said she believed the CSK was the Belmont gun shop suicide guy. Anyone know who this was? Was he ever a suspect?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
87
Guests online
507
Total visitors
594

Forum statistics

Threads
625,634
Messages
18,507,368
Members
240,827
Latest member
shaymac4413
Back
Top