I think you mean 'not there that day'? That's what I heard.There was a third girl child in the family there that day. I was under the impression there were only two: a 7 year old and a 9 year old.
Three little girls orphaned by him.
I think you mean 'not there that day'? That's what I heard.There was a third girl child in the family there that day. I was under the impression there were only two: a 7 year old and a 9 year old.
Three little girls orphaned by him.
No defense attorney would advise a guilty plea at the arraignment, but it is always ultimately the defendants choice.No Guilty Plea
and
an admission of guilt?
![]()
Teeny tiny little feet, like the 'back' pic!On the off chance someone hasn't posted this yet (I checked but may have missed)
eta- nothing groundbreaking but I cannot help but gawk![]()
Surveillance video shows Devil's Den murder suspect being booked into jail
Surveillance video released Thursday shows Andrew James McGann being booked into the Washington County Detention Center in Fayetteville, Arkansas.www.4029tv.com
I agree - it was very educational, not just about this case but crime solving in general.Presser ended.
That was an EXCELLENT presser, imo.
(Though I'm super shocked the kids were not his target. That will take awhile to sink in for me.)
A homicidal maniac and a pedophile in one, that is a combo.From the very start it seemed like a random attack to me. And being a creepy teacher does not necessarily mean the children were the targets as had been assumed. You can be a weirdo who shouldn't be a teacher and also a crazy who randomly commits homicide.
Crime is way messier than most "science" that tries to get applied to it to make it make sense, but alas, human brains will never not seek to make a pattern.
Stuff like this is the stuff of our nightmares. All you do is exist, and come across a monster.
Standard procedure. Even the AG at the presser said it's something every defense lawyer would advise a client to do, to plead not-guilty. (The role of the trial is to make the State PROVE its case. It's too early to plead not-guilty, if he ever will.)Not Guilty Plea
and (at the same time)
an admission of guilt?
![]()
In the poster's transcript one of the authorities said that even with the suspect's admissions, no defense attorney is going to let his client enter an initial guilty plea.Not Guilty Plea
and (at the same time)
an admission of guilt?
![]()
So did he prepare for, and plan, a random murder?Very lucky that they matched his DNA, that he made no attempt to flee or hide his vehicle, and that he went to a public salon. And has admitted to the crime. I guess pleading not guilty is a formality?
Surprised that they say the daughters were not his target...
Teeny tiny little feet, like the 'back' pic!
They said they have no indication the daughters were his target and that they are still exploring the motive for the crime. They also said they didn't watch the recording of the admission of guilt.Very lucky that they matched his DNA, that he made no attempt to flee or hide his vehicle, and that he went to a public salon. And has admitted to the crime. I guess pleading not guilty is a formality?
Surprised that they say the daughters were not his target...
Standard procedure. Even the AG at the presser said it's something every defense lawyer would advise a client to do, to plead not-guilty. (The role of the trial is to make the State PROVE its case. It's too early to plead not-guilty, if he ever will.)
jmopinion
The eldest daughter was not on the trail with he rest of the family on Saturday.I think you mean 'not there that day'? That's what I heard.
Quite welcome, glad I can still do that!Thank you @AngTxGirl for this effort.
It is a great help to be able to read the transcript and not miss something said.
I'm glad he shared that insight. There's been a lot of cases where people get upset about that, think everything is the personal decisions of a defendent. But their lawyers are making a lot of these decisions because the lawyers know how the system works.Yep.
I watched the presser. The prosecuting attorney said he wasn't aware if the defendant had retained a private lawyer yet or if he would utilize someone from the public defender's office. Regardless, he doesn't know any defense lawyer who would let their client plead guilty at an initial hearing (even if the defendant has already admitted to the murders to LE).
MOO.
I heard them say that "there is no indication at this time that the girls were his target.They said they have no indication the daughters were not his target and that they are still exploring the motive for the crime. They also said they didn't watch the recording of the admission of guilt.
From the very start it seemed like a random attack to me. And being a creepy teacher does not necessarily mean the children were the targets as had been assumed. You can be a weirdo who shouldn't be a teacher and also a crazy who randomly commits homicide.
Crime is way messier than most "science" that tries to get applied to it to make it make sense, but alas, human brains will never not seek to make a pattern.
Stuff like this is the stuff of our nightmares. All you do is exist, and come across a monster.