- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 19,063
- Reaction score
- 147,181
I voted the same. She knows stuff she's never been able to share.
I voted the same. She knows stuff she's never been able to share.
Didn’t know it is pro bono. Thanks.He supposedly has a high profile attorney who is taking the case pro bono - David Beller.
Barry Morphew's link to sedatives detailed in new indictment accusing him of Suzanne Morphew's murder
Another thing to remember is his was during the beginning of COVID lockdowns. This was May 2020. The world was stopped. Who would suzanne encounter that would want to harm her other than Barry? He arrived home at a specific time and she never communicated with anyone else ever again from that moment on. He also promptlyl turned his phone off. Her digital foot print ceased when he arrived home. Her phone has never been found either. So how did her phone go silent the moment he arrives home if he didn't have something to do with it?Ahhh butttt…
This case is strong, but not without risk. The prosecution finally has real physical evidence (BAM, body/remains, body concealment), solid behavioral evidence (BM’s actions, movements, trash runs), and Suzanne’s own words (texts and conversations). That’s a very strong foundation.
But the defense is not empty-handed. Their strongest angle is what’s missing. No cause of death. No murder scene. No direct evidence tying BM physically to her death or the second body move. Those are real gaps, and any smart defense attorney will hammer them relentlessly. Their job is to create doubt .
The prosecution absolutely can convict BM. The jury will see a man who behaved exactly like someone trying to cover up a homicide. The BAM in Suzanne’s system may very well be the piece that closes the gap in the jury’s minds.
But the prosecution only wins if they stay laser-focused on what they can prove and avoid turning it into a messy, emotional sideshow like last time. The defense needs only one or two jurors to get uncomfortable with the unknowns.
(I do think BM can say goodbye to freedom for the record)
imo
I read that somewhere but not seeing it in MSM. So please disregard my comment until I can source and link. I’m fighting with a terrible cold, so off kilter a bit.Didn’t know it is pro bono. Thanks.
Hope you feel better soon Knox.I read that somewhere but not seeing it in MSM. So please disregard my comment until I can source and link. I’m fighting with a terrible cold, so off kilter a bit.
I've just remembered.... the DNA found in the glove box and elsewhere in SM's car. I know they tied it in with unidentified DNA found at other crime scenes. Does anyone know if any definitive identification ever came of this and could it still be a loophole through which BM and his lawyers might conceivably try to climb?
IMO, BM received the scratch wounds when SM was desperately fighting him off as he injected her with BAM.So he raped her before using the BAM?
I ask because if she fought him and gave him those gauges, why wouldn’t he have just strangled her in his anger? Why use the BAM after?
And if he had used it before, she would have been unable to fight him or leave any gauges.
Not exactly. A couple of sources (upthread) mention how the context of the arrest will be an issue at trial.LE statement was that the arrest was made without incident.
So he raped her before using the BAM?
I ask because if she fought him and gave him those gauges, why wouldn’t he have just strangled her in his anger? Why use the BAM after?
as h
And if he had used it before, she would have been unable to fight him or leave any gauges.
Well I’d say the same to any of those scenarios- good luck with that. Again, random abductor(s) don’t typically shoot their victims up with BAM, nor go to the trouble of staging bikes, helmets and forcing the husband aka BM to do all the other incriminating things he did which if you’ve been following the case for 5 years you know the ‘list’ of things aka evidence and lies he did/said that would have to be chalked up to coincidences is extremely loonnnggg and frankly, not logical or believable. And SM shooting herself up with BAM, or BM killed her in Self Defense, yeah no imo.
Not that I don’t put it past BM or his D team to attempt to make him the victim and they could try to proffer a SM attacked BM while he was holding a syringe of BAM and killed her in self defense, will not fly due to the lengths he went to cover up the crime. Again, not logical or believable. IMO most people that kill someone in self defense don’t panic to that extent - plant bikes, helmets, move bodies around etc, etc, etc.
IMO regardless of whatever BM/his D attempt to proffer up, the guy is beyond cooked to most rational, logical, common sense people who’ve followed the case for years, know all the publicly released details and evidence, never mind what we don’t even know all of everything they have on him which is sure that they do have more as P/LE don’t release all the evidence they have against the suspect prior to trial.
At any rate, my hope is the future jury are comprised of same rational, reasonable, logical, common sense people that can follow the evidence and connect the dots to imo only logical conclusion, BM intentionally killed his wife and engaged in one of the most elaborate, absolutely laughable and unbelievable cover-ups in the annals of intimate partner homicide/spousal murder.
IMHOO
#JUSTICEFORSUZANNE
ETA-added couple words, sentence, fixed paragraph spacing
He can certainly throw that at the wall! Others may recall talk of an incident where SM was cleaning the bathroom and mixed bathroom cleaners -- causing a medical reaction. MOOIs there any chance he could claim she "accidentally" got a dose of BAM prior to her disappearance, in some bizarre household/hunting accident, but that it was reversed or otherwise didn't cause her lasting effects? Sounds ridiculous but he will be desperate to separate that BAM from her death in any way possible... MOO...
It’s mentioned in the arrest affidavitI've just remembered.... the DNA found in the glove box and elsewhere in SM's car. I know they tied it in with unidentified DNA found at other crime scenes. Does anyone know if any definitive identification ever came of this and could it still be a loophole through which BM and his lawyers might conceivably try to climb?
AFAIK there is no black market for BAM.Totally, if he pleads innocent, the role of his defence lawyer is to craft a defence to be put up at trial & be heard in front of a jury.
That defence can be anything, accidental overdose, assisted suicide, self-defense, it wasn't him at all ... it was someone else who had accessed BAM on the black market etc
IMO
Thanks, I am relieved to know thatAFAIK there is no black market for BAM.
It’s not like horse tranquilizer that gets mixed /cut with fentanyl for street drugs for humans.
There is a black market for that.
JMO.
He can certainly throw that at the wall! Others may recall talk of an incident where SM was cleaning the bathroom and mixed bathroom cleaners -- causing a medical reaction. MOO
looking at the indictment, I think they were ruling out the port. In any case, he would need to subdue her to be able to administer the BAM. I think its more likely that Suzanne was injected with it, either by hand or by dart gun (which IIRC was not operational when found by LE). imo.Isn’t a cancer port a direct conduit to the bloodstream?