I believe the puppy is with HH. MOO.is puppy actually missing? Just bc AS requested that she be returned to him doesn't mean she's actually missing...or did I miss something? It would not surprise me!
I believe the puppy is with HH. MOO.is puppy actually missing? Just bc AS requested that she be returned to him doesn't mean she's actually missing...or did I miss something? It would not surprise me!
Yes, I'm interested in links. I know he asked for the dog and suddenly I'm feeling I missed legit info?When did we learn that when AS got home, the puppy was gone? Do you mean when he got back to the house, from Oklahoma, on the 28th January the dog was already gone?
It's possible, yes. The specialize in cloud computing, so they would more than likely assist in the retrieval of her data saved in the cloud. They also specialize in disaster recovery, security as a service, etc. It doesn't specifically say that they consult for law enforcement, but it's possible that they don't want to publicize that on their website.NewCloud is on the witness list with 2 individuals listed
I am technologically challenged but did check online and noticed an office in Denver (Didn’t want to add the link in case I’m mistaken)
Can anyone offer insight into why they are listed?
Is it for accessing all her SM, email, texts, etc.?
#FindGannon
I have had the thought that this may not be the first murder for LS.
Just a thought!
Monkeys eat bananas.
Murderers murder.
I believe LS to be a murderer.
I thought that too, but it would have helped LS’s narrative that Gannon ran away... he was so upset about the dog, etc... or that he left with the dog....That's a great thought. What if Sadie was hit by a car and died (Gannon very upset & crying). That could make sense of the "gate story" and why she mentioned Gannon had the only key? He wouldn't have done it "on purpose" ...
You'll find your answers in links to the Divorce filing.When did we learn that when AS got home, the puppy was gone? Do you mean when he got back to the house, from Oklahoma, on the 28th January the dog was already gone?
What is your point?It is confusing, because he said, IIRC, that he started looking at the videos on the TV after Gannon went missing, because he had insomnia (IIRC), that it was a bigger screen than his tablet, and that when he discovered that TS had passed his house twice in the red truck, and that Gannon had entered and in his opinion not left when she got back, that it was THEN that he showed that evidence to first AS, and THEN to LE
But according to what he says in your post, LE already had the whole shebang before he went to show AS. And next he says, he went to show LE, who already had the videos he had given to them before.
I was questioning a poster who stated that as fact.You'll find your answers in links to the Divorce filing.
I, too, am happy that he released such evidence to LE.
Police having his vidoes as well as those of other neighbors means that they have them in possession, not have that they reviewed them.It is confusing, because he said, IIRC, that he started looking at the videos on the TV after Gannon went missing, because he had insomnia (IIRC), that it was a bigger screen than his tablet, and that when he discovered that TS had passed his house twice in the red truck, and that Gannon had entered and in his opinion not left when she got back, that it was THEN that he showed that evidence to first AS, and THEN to LE
But according to what he says in your post, LE already had the whole shebang before he went to show AS. And next he says, he went to show LE, who already had the videos he had given to them before.
But LS was not frantic because she thought she had it all under controlA frantic worried parent would have wanted to see the video
MOO been wondering ever since I read about his “accidental death”, glad to see that being checked out!I think the FBI has had this thought as well.
I’ve not seen any data on “dog discussion”, so please provide MSM about “keeping the dog”. And, do we know who has what dogs and why? Thanks
My point is the original point I made. That I doubt that the prosecution would ever call this neighbor as a witness, except for him to say yes it was his video. Because there are so many contradictions in all his media interviews. A very good example of why witnesses should stick to interacting with LE and not go public while a boy is missing, possibly murdered. It looks like they've got a long list of witnesses to bolster the prosecution, and we haven't heard any of them going to the press for multiple interviews or discussing evidence in the press.What is your point?
I'm getting confused.
I, too, am happy that he released such evidence to LE.
Maybe the dog is with another member of the family. It didn't make any sense to demand the dog from LS when she is in custody. Maybe he was just passing the word onto someone else who may have the dog. It's his divorce, how could he say I won't do the divorce without the dog? Unless it was a request separate from the divorce papers, that would make more sense. I doubt that anyone killed the dog, it's more likely that too many people love the dog.Maybe the dog went to Myrtle Beach with TS?
... and spiraled and rapidly descending ....I think what RD released and his comments were designed by LE. I don’t believe he leaked or media leaked anything that wasn’t LE approved. They wanted LS to react. She certainly spiraled after that....
My understanding from RD speaking to Dave Mack from Crime Online. RD at the very beginning offered LS his footage. He is taking her word. Trusting her. I am not sure if he actually watched it at this point. IF he did he is looking at the timeframe provided by LS (3:15 - 3:30 Monday).
Starting around 29:00
“I went over to his house and I was like hey I have a camera that I can see if anyone came by and picked him up, do you wanna watch it? and first thing SHE said was NO, he went the other way, he didn’t come towards the HOUSE…so I didn’t think anything of it…..
Saturday, Feb. 1, the FBI goes door to door, his curiosity is piqued when they take footage from the days before Gannon is missing.
“So that Saturday the FBI and cops were going around asking people if they could watch our cameras, coming around asking people for video. He looked at mine and he went back to SATURDAY. My wife and I went to the movies, but when I came back, I was like hmmm why did he go back to SATURDAY.
So when I got back home I went through hundreds and hundreds of videos.
I watched the video at least 20 to 30 times to make sure. That is when I went to his house and showed him (AL).
They took 60-70 videos that I recorded. They have all of it. Day and night. My video records 24hrs."
Thank GOD for Roderick. All the quotes attributed to RD are confusing. The above helped me understand the timing better. IF FBI was just going around Saturday to secure the videos, RD is a hero. He watched the video likely before the FBI even had time to do so, as they just took it from him that Saturday morning? Add in the infamous IT interview and RD now has many reasons to study all of his footage and he has lots of it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.