GordianKnot
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2018
- Messages
- 5,780
- Reaction score
- 119,769
I mean, she killed him at what we believe was the dumpsite, or she killed him in his bedroom and dumped his body there. Either way, she’s a killer.
I can’t imagine a juror getting hung up on something that doesn’t mean a hell of a lot in regards to her guilt.
But we’ll see if the narrative changes.
BBM:
Unfortunately, I can. "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit." Ring any bells?
A none-too-bright juror could definitely get hung up on that point if the prosecution argued that he was killed in his bedroom but wasn't able to prove that he returned with her in the truck that afternoon.
I've talked to some not terribly bright people who have an amazing capacity to miss the most important aspects of a situation and instead get hung up on meaningless, inconsequential minutiae.
The most common term used to describe these people is, "Management."
JMO.
Last edited: