- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 13,534
- Reaction score
- 89,072
Oh okay. Yes he was weird too.Not one pic. Someone was talking about TS smiling after G died and acting like she was enjoying the publicity. I said it’s like all of CW’s interviews.
Oh okay. Yes he was weird too.Not one pic. Someone was talking about TS smiling after G died and acting like she was enjoying the publicity. I said it’s like all of CW’s interviews.
Oh, thanks! I didn't see another article from crimeonline and figured she was doing another jail interview. I considered this a real possibility coming from her mouth. That's how bat**it this is.No. Just speculation as to what her defense might be.
I am not a lawyer, but they are bound by not only the law but also by the ethics of their profession. A lawyer could not allow the client to do something that would be a determent to the client and/or that would be illegal (like lie under oath).
The lawyer would have to counsel a client like that, imo, to be quiet and make the prosecution prove its case and hope the prosecution messes up. (That's the only hope she has, imo.)
Very interested in hearing from experts here.
jmo
Good for you! My daughter started in Journalism, switched to Law and ended up in IT.
Will the June hearings be televised? I know her trial won’t be but what about prelims?
I believe the judge said no. But regarding the actual trial, Court Tv has asked to have a pool camera in the courtroom.
It has her DNA in the shoe! No one else’s.Hope the neighbors video is clear enough to see her shoes!
No, I didn't follow the Arias case. Or Casey Anthony.Did you watch the Arias case?!
Where were ethics then? The client controls a LOT. It was a circus. The judge was exasperated. She was one vote away from the death penalty, regardless of her antics. But she caused quite a scene every.single.day.
Thanks. Going to read.New docs just dropped.
https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/04th_Judicial_District/El_Paso/Stauch/Proposed Order 040820(1).pdf
Does this mean what I think it means? Still learning how to read these docs.
ETA:
Colorado Judicial Branch
Actually, layman's terms of what all these new docs would be GREATLY appreciated!
Sounds like any phone, computer, etc communications they have on her from those specific dates have been approved to be released to the public.New docs just dropped.
https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/04th_Judicial_District/El_Paso/Stauch/Proposed Order 040820(1).pdf
Does this mean what I think it means? Still learning how to read these docs.
ETA:
Colorado Judicial Branch
Actually, layman's terms of what all these new docs would be GREATLY appreciated!
It’s just the one document ? Asking for release of texts and emails? Judge hasn’t dated and signed. can someone help?New docs just dropped.
https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/04th_Judicial_District/El_Paso/Stauch/Proposed Order 040820(1).pdf
Does this mean what I think it means? Still learning how to read these docs.
ETA:
Colorado Judicial Branch
Actually, layman's terms of what all these new docs would be GREATLY appreciated!
Oh no! Please don’t go. I didn’t mean it that way at all.No, I didn't follow the Arias case. Or Casey Anthony.
I'll see myself out and leave my WS credentials at the door.
![]()
Anthony case at least had decorum,etc. she had a sneaky lawyer. Think OJ.No, I didn't follow the Arias case. Or Casey Anthony.
I'll see myself out and leave my WS credentials at the door.
![]()
This is awesome so I wonder if we will get the electronic communications released this afternoon?4th Judicial DA @4thJudicialDA
UPDATE: The next hearing date for Letecia Leann Stauch is a Preliminary Hearing set for Friday, June 5 & Monday, June 8th @ 9. Today’s hearing has been vacated.
5:24 AM - 14 Apr 2020
^^bbm
Before COVID-19 closures, LS actually had a "Status Hearing" set for today, April 14.
On April 6, Defense proposed this hearing waived and it appears that both parties have agreed to a date for the Preliminary Hearing. (From dates previously offered for the status hearing).
Both Motion to Reconsider Order -07 and Response to Motions uploaded to Colorado Court site today.
Colorado Judicial Branch - El Paso - Cases of Interest - The People of the State of Colorado v. Letecia Stauch
Yeah, I remember her saying she had taken two polygraphs.And she said she did take another lie detector test, an honest one and was going to give it to crime online if they had been able to have the next interview. Lol.
Arias had to represent herself at one point to promote her lies.No, I didn't follow the Arias case. Or Casey Anthony.
I'll see myself out and leave my WS credentials at the door.
![]()
It’s just the one document ? Asking for release of texts and emails? Judge hasn’t dated and signed. can someone help?
@Love Never Fails, I know! I was making fun of myself....all with a smile. No worries!!Oh no! Please don’t go. I didn’t mean it that way at all.
Try this:Oh well I tried to post a vomit emoji but it’s not showing up.